Conversation
… DELETED to not have mess with mapping to v5.0
|
You can recheck all mapping changes, but... @randomstuff - please check, is it suitable mapping @tghosth - please check, are those suitable mappings:
If no feedback for tomorrow, I'm going to merge it in to move further. |
is technically not really split from v4 6.2.3:
The former is about hash functions which is not really covered by v4 6.2.3. |
I think here is some misread, typo or other misunderstanding in place. v4.0.3-6.2.3 got deleted, as it is covered by v5.0.be-6.5.1, v5.0.be-6.5.2, v5.0.be-6.6.3. Probbaly v5.0.be-6.5.1 can be removed from this list. |
|
I merged it in, because it contains changes to many requirements and it may cause content conflicts for other PR's. If there is some incorrect mapping in place, please open a separate issue or PR to address that. |
|
I say 6.2.3 be augmented to include hashes and drop 6.6.3.
6.6.3 is out of line with ASVS philosophy and it’s not critical based on other requirements, especially if we enhance 6.2.3.
|
This Pull Request relates to issue #2515