svc's addons page revamp #210
Conversation
|
/pr test |
|
❌ MEGA PR Test Failed @ampelectrecuted Something went wrong during the build or analysis process. Check the logs for details: View Logs |
ampelectrecuted
changed the title
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
Note Unit test generation is an Early Access feature. Expect some limitations and changes as we gather feedback and continue to improve it. Generating unit tests... This may take up to 20 minutes. |
|
@ampelectrecuted what does this do? |
|
i guess we can wait for coderabbit nvm |
|
OH WAIT ADDONS PAGE WE DEFINITELY NEED A REVAMP I ALWAYS THOUGHT IT WAS SO UGLY IT NEEDS MORE CHARM |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/addons/settings/settings.css(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: mega-test
| *{ | ||
| transition: all 0.2s ease-in-out; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove the universal transition: all rule
Applying transition: all 0.2s to * forces every property change (layout, focus outlines, form controls, etc.) on the page to animate. This introduces jank, delays focus indicators (hurting accessibility), and overrides carefully tuned transitions defined later in the file. Please drop the universal rule and scope the animation to the specific elements you want to animate.
-*{
- transition: all 0.2s ease-in-out;
-}
+.addon-group-expand-container {
+ transition: transform 0.2s ease-in-out, background 0.2s ease-in-out;
+}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| *{ | |
| transition: all 0.2s ease-in-out; | |
| } | |
| .addon-group-expand-container { | |
| transition: transform 0.2s ease-in-out, background 0.2s ease-in-out; | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/addons/settings/settings.css around lines 20 to 22, remove the universal
rule "transition: all 0.2s ease-in-out" and instead apply scoped transitions
only to the elements and properties that should animate (for example buttons,
links, input controls, icons, and containers) using explicit properties like
transition: background-color 0.2s, color 0.2s, opacity 0.2s, transform 0.2s;
avoid animating layout or focus outlines and ensure focus states are
instantaneous or have separate, accessible timing to prevent delayed focus
indicators.
|
Creating a local commit for the generated unit tests... The unit tests have been committed to the current branch. Commit ID: |
|
❌ MEGA PR Test Failed @ampelectrecuted Something went wrong during the build or analysis process. Check the logs for details: View Logs |
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for submitting this pull request.
This PR proposes a revamp of the "addons" page, focusing on UI improvements (e.g., smooth transitions and hover effects) and introduces comprehensive unit tests for validating package-lock.json integrity. It also includes other miscellaneous test updates.
General Observations:
- Syntax/Runtime Errors: There are no apparent syntax or runtime issues in the provided code. Everything seems well-structured and functional.
- Security Concerns: While the tests for
package-lock.jsonaddress indirect security issues by validating integrity hashes and secure protocols, you might want to include explicit vulnerability scanning, especially for critical dependencies. - Performance/Maintainability: Adding a global
transitionvia*selector insettings.cssimpacts all elements and might negatively affect performance for large DOM trees or Sparkle-heavy UIs. Consider scopingtransitionto relevant elements for optimization.
Suggestions to Improve:
- **CSS (`src/addons
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
|
||
| test('git dependencies use SSH protocol', () => { | ||
| Object.entries(packageLock.packages || {}).forEach(([key, pkg]) => { | ||
| if (pkg.resolved && pkg.resolved.includes('github.com')) { |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Incomplete URL substring sanitization High test
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix
AI 4 months ago
To address the issue, the check for 'github.com' in the URL should not be performed with .includes(), but rather by robustly parsing the URL and checking its host component. Specifically, the correct way is to use the built-in Node.js URL class to parse pkg.resolved and check if the .host or .hostname is exactly 'github.com' or, if subdomains are allowed, ends with '.github.com' (after a dot or at the start). In this context, the goal is probably to ensure the dependency is from GitHub proper, not from any arbitrary domain containing that string.
So, in the test on line 71, instead of testing pkg.resolved.includes('github.com'), parse pkg.resolved with new URL(), extract the hostname, and check if it equals 'github.com' (and/or add other allowed forms as needed).
This requires:
- Importing the
URLclass if necessary (in Node.js, it's global and does not need an import). - Replacing the substring check with robust property access on the parsed URL object.
| @@ -68,9 +68,16 @@ | ||
|
|
||
| test('git dependencies use SSH protocol', () => { | ||
| Object.entries(packageLock.packages || {}).forEach(([key, pkg]) => { | ||
| if (pkg.resolved && pkg.resolved.includes('github.com')) { | ||
| if (pkg.resolved.startsWith('git+')) { | ||
| expect(pkg.resolved).toContain('git+ssh://'); | ||
| if (pkg.resolved) { | ||
| try { | ||
| const resolvedUrl = new URL(pkg.resolved.replace(/^git\+/, '')); | ||
| if (resolvedUrl.hostname === 'github.com') { | ||
| if (pkg.resolved.startsWith('git+')) { | ||
| expect(pkg.resolved).toContain('git+ssh://'); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } catch (e) { | ||
| // ignore invalid URLs in resolved (they'll fail other tests) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }); |
what the 67 yo
🎉 MEGA PR Test & Analysis Complete!Hi @ampelectrecuted! Your PR has been fully tested and analyzed! 🚀✨ 🌍 Test DeploymentLive Preview: https://OmniBlocks.github.io/scratch-gui/supervoidcoder/210/ 🔦 Performance Audit (Lighthouse)Core Scores:
📊 Detailed Performance Metrics:
📥 Download full Lighthouse report 📦 Bundle Size AnalysisTotal Build Size: 136M 📦 Top 5 Largest JavaScript Files:
🎨 Top 5 Largest CSS Files:
♿ Accessibility Testing
📊 Build Details
💡 Pro Tip: Only one build was needed for all these checks - saving CI/CD minutes! 🎯 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for submitting this pull request.
This PR aims to revamp the service's addons page by making styling changes (settings.css) and adding unit tests for package-lock.json integrity, CSS validation, and workflow summaries. The changes improve the site's visual responsiveness and enhance testing coverage.
General Comments
- Syntax/runtime errors: No obvious syntax errors or runtime issues were observed in the provided files.
- Security concerns: The security tests for
package-lock.jsonensure dependencies use valid hashes and protocols, but please confirm these align with organizational policies. Consider adding tools such asnpm auditfor tracking vulnerabilities over time. - Performance/maintainability issues: Using CSS transitions (
* { transition: all 0.2s ease-in-out; }) globally may cause unnecessary overhead in UI responsiveness for certain elements. It's advisable to scope transitions to specific elements/classes instead of applying them universally. - Testing improvements: Unit tests for `package-lock.json
uh suync brannch ig
🎉 MEGA PR Test & Analysis Complete!Hi @ampelectrecuted! Your PR has been fully tested and analyzed! 🚀✨ 🌍 Test DeploymentLive Preview: https://OmniBlocks.github.io/scratch-gui/supervoidcoder/210/ 🔦 Performance Audit (Lighthouse)Core Scores:
📊 Detailed Performance Metrics:
📥 Download full Lighthouse report 📦 Bundle Size AnalysisTotal Build Size: 136M 📦 Top 5 Largest JavaScript Files:
🎨 Top 5 Largest CSS Files:
♿ Accessibility Testing
📊 Build Details
💡 Pro Tip: Only one build was needed for all these checks - saving CI/CD minutes! 🎯 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for submitting this pull request.
High-Level Summary
This PR introduces a revamp to the "addons page" in the application, including updated styles (settings.css) and unit tests for improved dependency verification (e.g., package-lock.json). It aims to enhance UI/UX responsiveness and ensure secure, consistent dependency handling.
Review Feedback
1. Syntax/Runtime Errors
- Code appears well-formed with no syntax errors.
- Transitions and transforms in the CSS file should work as expected. However, thorough UI testing is recommended to ensure visual integrity across browsers.
2. Security and Safety Concerns
- Good focus on dependency validation, particularly with
package-lock.test.js. Validatingintegrityandversioningprovides strong safeguards for package security. - Suggestion: Consider adding a test that explicitly checks for known insecure dependency versions using a tool like
npm audit.
3. **Performance and
|
/test pr |
🎉 MEGA PR Test & Analysis Complete!Hi @supervoidcoder! Your PR has been fully tested and analyzed! 🚀✨ 🌍 Test DeploymentLive Preview: https://OmniBlocks.github.io/scratch-gui/supervoidcoder/210/ 🧪 Test ResultsESLint: ❌ Found issues
Unit Tests: ✅
Integration Tests: ❌
📄 Full test outputs available in artifacts 🔦 Performance Audit (Lighthouse)✅ Audit completed successfully!
What was checked:
💡 Note: Lighthouse may find improvement opportunities - check artifacts for details! 📦 Bundle Size AnalysisTotal Build Size: 136M 📦 Top 5 Largest JavaScript Files:
🎨 Top 5 Largest CSS Files:
♿ Accessibility Testing✅ Accessibility scan completed!
📊 Build Details
💡 Pro Tip: Only one build was needed for all these checks - saving CI/CD minutes! 🎯 |
|
🎉 MEGA PR Test & Analysis Complete!Hi @supervoidcoder! Your PR has been fully tested and analyzed! 🚀✨ 🌍 Test DeploymentLive Preview: https://OmniBlocks.github.io/scratch-gui/supervoidcoder/210/ 🧪 Test ResultsESLint: ❌ Found issues
Unit Tests: ✅
Integration Tests: ❌
📄 Full test outputs available in artifacts 🔦 Performance Audit (Lighthouse)✅ Audit completed successfully!
What was checked:
💡 Note: Lighthouse may find improvement opportunities - check artifacts for details! 📦 Bundle Size AnalysisTotal Build Size: 136M 📦 Top 5 Largest JavaScript Files:
🎨 Top 5 Largest CSS Files:
♿ Accessibility Testing✅ Accessibility scan completed!
📊 Build Details
💡 Pro Tip: Only one build was needed for all these checks - saving CI/CD minutes! 🎯 |
|
/test pr |
ampelectrecuted
removed
Medium-Priority
High-Priority
🕐 Stale PR ReminderHey @8to16! 🌟 Just popping in to remind you about PR #210 – the revamp of svc's addons page! It’s looking super exciting, but I noticed it’s been a week since the last update. If you’re facing any roadblocks or just need a helping hand, don’t hesitate to shout out! 🚀 We’re all here to help you bring that creative vision to life! Keep up the awesome work! 🎨✨ This is an automated friendly reminder. No pressure! 💙 |
🕐 Stale PR ReminderHey @8to16! 🌟 Just wanted to swing by and give a little nudge about your awesome PR #210, which aims to revamp the svc's addons page! It’s been 7 days since we last heard from you, and I'm super excited about what you're creating! 🚀 If you need any help or if something is blocking your progress, feel free to shout out! We're all here to support each other and can't wait to see the magic you’ll bring to the addons page! 🎨✨ This is an automated friendly reminder. No pressure! 💙 |
🕐 Stale PR ReminderHey @ampelectrecuted! 👋 This PR has been quiet for a while. Need any help getting it across the finish line? Feel free to ask! 🚀 This is an automated friendly reminder. No pressure! 💙 |
2 similar comments
🕐 Stale PR ReminderHey @ampelectrecuted! 👋 This PR has been quiet for a while. Need any help getting it across the finish line? Feel free to ask! 🚀 This is an automated friendly reminder. No pressure! 💙 |
🕐 Stale PR ReminderHey @ampelectrecuted! 👋 This PR has been quiet for a while. Need any help getting it across the finish line? Feel free to ask! 🚀 This is an automated friendly reminder. No pressure! 💙 |
2 participants
Resolves
What Github issue does this resolve (if any, if not then please include link)?
Proposed Changes
Describe what this Pull Request does
Reason for Changes
Explain why these changes should be made. Why is this helpful or necessary? Why should this be added?
Test Coverage
Please show how you have added tests to cover your changes
Browser Coverage
Check the OS/browser combinations tested (At least 2)
Mac
Windows
Chromebook
iPad
Android Tablet