-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reformat skos:definition and rdfs:comment #50
Conversation
between which a transition takes place. These contradictions refer to | ||
some collection of pairwise disjoint universals.</skos:definition> | ||
<skos:definition rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">A change in the technical sense refers to a pair of process boundaries. Either at coinciding boundaries (then it comes close to notions like ``punctual'' or ``instantaneous event'' as well as ``moment'' -- in a temporal reading), or at boundaries at the opposite ends of a process of arbitrary extension. | ||
The notion of change is relative to contradictory conditions between which a transition takes place. These contradictions refer to some collection of pairwise disjoint universals.</skos:definition> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There should never be a newline in a definition, because they are interpreted differently between operating systems and might interfere with programs which display the ontology later on.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What do you suggest? I don't want to get too involved in the OWL file, as I'm not the original author.
is another option. But honestly, Protégé also just puts "\n" in the file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
After a quick Internet search I was not able to find any example or statement which supports what I am suggesting, so its more of a personal opinion. But as stated above, avoid newlines whenever possible might help with later processing because
- of issues, such as in Add GFO-light minimal version #34 (comment) (line endings in Windows)
- changed line endings might also lead to "bloated" commit-diffs, because Git thinks something changed when in fact only the editor used the operating systems default when saving a file
However, there is no need to invest more time than necessary. Just my two cents, because you picked up my comment from #42 (comment) and seemed you wanna get rid of all the newlines in the first place.
Co-authored-by: Konrad Abicht <hi@inspirito.de>
Line breaks in
rdfs:comments
have been fixed as well.