feat: Refactor pika binlog to achieve idempotency and master-slave consistency #2906
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a series of enhancements across multiple files in the codebase, focusing on the implementation of new command classes, methods for handling timestamps, and modifications to existing command functionalities. New commands related to hash sets, sorted sets, and hyperloglog data structures are added, along with methods for Redis protocol compliance. The updates also include changes to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
github-actions
bot
added
✏️ Feature
|
@coderabbitai review |
Actions performedReview triggered.
|
@coderabbitai review |
|
@Issues-translate-bot: I will review the changes. Analysis chainScripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Fetch the PR title and body for PR #2906
gh pr view 2906 --repo OpenAtomFoundation/pika --json title,body
Length of output: 167 Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 50
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (46)
include/pika_hyperloglog.h (1)
34-56: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for empty methods.The new
PKHyperloglogSetCmdclass is well-structured and follows the pattern of other command classes in the file. The implementation looks correct and complete.Consider adding a brief comment for the empty
Split()andMerge()methods to explain why they are intentionally left empty. This can improve code readability and prevent future confusion. For example:// Split operation is not applicable for this command void Split(const HintKeys& hint_keys) override {} // Merge operation is not needed for this command void Merge() override {}include/pika_cache.h (1)
176-176: LGTM: New method ZSetAtIfKeyExists addedThe addition of the
ZSetAtIfKeyExistsmethod to thePikaCacheclass looks good. It extends the functionality for handling sorted sets (ZSet) operations.Consider adding a brief comment above the method declaration to explain its purpose and any important details about its behavior. For example:
// Performs a "set at" operation on a sorted set if the key exists. // Returns the status of the operation. rocksdb::Status ZSetAtIfKeyExists(std::string& key, std::string& member, PKZSetAtCmd* cmd, const std::shared_ptr<DB>& db);include/pika_command.h (1)
123-123: Consider adding overall documentation for new Pika-specific commands.The addition of these four new Pika-specific command constants (
kCmdNamePKHSetAt,kCmdNamePKZSetAt,kCmdNamePKSAdd,kCmdNamePKHyperloglogSet) is consistent with the existing code style and naming conventions. However, to improve maintainability and ease of use for other developers, consider adding a section in the file or in the project documentation that explains:
- The purpose of these Pika-specific commands.
- How they differ from their standard Redis counterparts.
- Any specific use cases or scenarios where these commands should be used.
This documentation will help future developers understand the rationale behind these custom commands and how to use them effectively.
Also applies to: 171-171, 194-194, 221-221
include/pika_kv.h (3)
187-192: LGTM! Consider initializingts_ms_in the constructor.The addition of
ToRedisProtocol()method andts_ms_member variable enhances the functionality and Redis protocol compatibility of theDecrCmdclass.Consider initializing
ts_ms_in the constructor instead of in the class definition. This allows for more flexibility in initialization and follows the general C++ best practice of initializing members in the constructor. For example:class DecrCmd : public Cmd { public: DecrCmd(const std::string& name, int arity, uint32_t flag) : Cmd(name, arity, flag, static_cast<uint32_t>(AclCategory::STRING)), ts_ms_(0) {} // ... rest of the class definition ... private: uint64_t ts_ms_; };
212-217: LGTM! Consider applying the same constructor initialization as suggested forDecrCmd.The changes to
DecrbyCmdare consistent with those made toDecrCmd, which is good for maintainability. The addition ofToRedisProtocol()method andts_ms_member variable enhances the functionality and Redis protocol compatibility of theDecrbyCmdclass.Please refer to the comment on
DecrCmdregarding initializingts_ms_in the constructor. Apply the same pattern here for consistency across similar classes.
Line range hint
1-1161: Overall, the changes enhance Redis compatibility and consistency across command classes.The modifications to
DecrCmd,DecrbyCmd, andAppendCmdclasses improve Redis protocol compatibility and potentially enhance timestamp handling. The consistency in these changes across similar classes is commendable.To further improve the code:
- Consider creating a base class for commands that require Redis protocol serialization and timestamp handling. This could reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.
- Ensure that the
DoInitial()method is consistently implemented across all command classes that require it.- Document the purpose and usage of the
ts_ms_variable, especially its role in Redis protocol serialization or any time-based operations.Next steps:
- Address the nitpicks about initializing
ts_ms_in constructors.- Provide more information about the
DoInitial()method inAppendCmd.- Consider refactoring to introduce a base class for common Redis protocol and timestamp functionality.
tests/integration/replication_test.go (1)
Line range hint
1-1000: Consider refactoring the test suite for improved maintainability and reliabilityWhile the test coverage appears comprehensive, there are several areas where the test suite could be improved:
Excessive use of
time.Sleep(): These make tests slower and potentially flaky. Consider using polling with timeouts or other synchronization mechanisms.Hardcoded error messages: Error message assertions like
Expect(slaveWrite.Err()).To(MatchError("ERR READONLY You can't write against a read only replica."))can be fragile. Consider using more flexible matching or focusing on error types rather than exact messages.Test suite length: The test suite is quite long, which can make it hard to maintain. Consider breaking it into smaller, more focused test files.
Repeated setup and teardown: There's repeated code for setting up and tearing down tests. Consider using BeforeEach and AfterEach hooks more extensively to reduce duplication.
Here's an example of how you might refactor the sleep statements:
func eventuallyEqual(ctx context.Context, masterClient, slaveClient *redis.Client, key string) { Eventually(func() string { return slaveClient.Get(ctx, key).Val() }, "10s", "100ms").Should(Equal(masterClient.Get(ctx, key).Val())) } // Use it like this: clientMaster.Set(ctx, "key", "value", 0) eventuallyEqual(ctx, clientMaster, clientSlave, "key")This approach is more reliable and often faster than using sleep statements.
src/pika_slot_command.cc (2)
723-724: Consider the purpose of introduced timestamp variables.Two unused
uint64_t ts_ms;variables have been introduced in theAddSlotKeyfunction. These variables appear to be intended for timestamp-related functionality, possibly for tracking when keys are added to slots and tags.To improve code clarity and maintainability:
If these variables are part of an ongoing implementation:
- Add TODO comments explaining their intended use.
- Create a ticket or issue to track the completion of this feature.
If these variables are no longer needed:
- Remove them to keep the code clean.
If you decide to implement the timestamp functionality:
- Ensure that the timestamps are consistently used for both slot and tag operations.
- Consider adding this information to the function's documentation.
- Update any related functions or methods that might need to handle or propagate this timestamp information.
Please clarify the intended use of these variables and update the code accordingly.
Also applies to: 734-735
Line range hint
1-1024: Summary of changes and recommendationsThe main changes in this file involve the introduction of two unused
uint64_t ts_ms;variables in theAddSlotKeyfunction. These variables appear to be intended for timestamp-related functionality but are currently not utilized.Recommendations:
- Clarify the purpose of these timestamp variables.
- Either implement the intended functionality or remove the unused variables.
- If part of an ongoing implementation, add appropriate TODO comments and create a tracking issue.
- Review any related functions or methods that might need to be updated if timestamp functionality is implemented.
Addressing these points will improve code clarity, maintainability, and prevent potential confusion for other developers working on this codebase.
src/storage/src/redis_strings.cc (1)
277-278: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The addition of the
ts_msparameter and its initialization look good. This change allows for timestamp tracking in theDecrbyoperation.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the
ts_msparameter for better code readability:Status Redis::Decrby(const Slice& key, int64_t value, int64_t* ret, uint64_t* ts_ms) { + // Initialize timestamp to 0 *ts_ms = 0;tests/integration/zset_test.go (7)
Line range hint
1074-1088: Consider enhancing the ZCard test with edge cases.While this test covers the basic functionality of ZCard, it could be improved by including additional scenarios:
- Test ZCard on an empty set (should return 0).
- Test ZCard after removing all members from a set.
- Test ZCard with a large number of members to ensure it scales correctly.
These additions would provide more comprehensive coverage of the ZCard functionality.
Line range hint
1090-1118: Separate ZLexCount into its own test case.The current test mixes ZCount and ZLexCount functionalities, which test different aspects of sorted sets. To improve clarity and maintainability:
- Keep the existing ZCount tests as they are.
- Create a separate test case for ZLexCount with appropriate lexicographical ranges.
This separation will make the tests more focused and easier to understand. Additionally, consider adding more test cases for ZLexCount to cover various lexicographical ranges.
Line range hint
1148-1186: Consider testing different Aggregate functions in ZInterStore.The current test for ZInterStore is good, but it could be more comprehensive. Suggest enhancing it by:
- Testing different Aggregate functions (SUM, MIN, MAX) in the ZStore struct.
- Verifying the results for each Aggregate function to ensure they're calculated correctly.
- Testing with more than two input sorted sets to ensure it works with multiple sets.
These additions would provide more thorough coverage of the ZInterStore functionality and its various options.
Line range hint
1188-1251: Move the invalid command check to a separate test.The ZPopMax test is well-structured and comprehensive for testing the main functionality. However, the check for an invalid command at the end (line 1250) seems out of place in this test. Suggest:
- Moving the invalid command check to a separate test case.
- Naming the new test case something like "should handle invalid ZPOPMAX arguments".
This separation will make the tests more focused and easier to maintain. Each test should ideally check one specific behavior or edge case.
Line range hint
1253-1316: Refactor ZPopMin test similar to ZPopMax.The ZPopMin test is well-structured but has the same issue as the ZPopMax test. To improve consistency and maintainability:
- Move the invalid command check (line 1315) to a separate test case.
- Name the new test case "should handle invalid ZPOPMIN arguments".
- Consider combining the invalid argument tests for ZPOPMAX and ZPOPMIN into a single test case that checks invalid arguments for both commands.
This refactoring will make the tests more focused and consistent with the suggested changes for the ZPopMax test.
Line range hint
1-1316: Address commented-out tests throughout the file.There are numerous commented-out tests throughout this file. This practice can lead to confusion and maintenance issues. To improve the test suite:
- Review each commented-out test and determine if it's still relevant.
- For relevant tests, uncomment and update them to work with the current codebase.
- For obsolete tests, remove them entirely.
- If tests are commented out due to known issues or pending features, add a TODO comment explaining why they're disabled and what needs to be done to re-enable them.
Cleaning up these commented-out tests will improve the overall maintainability and clarity of the test suite.
Line range hint
1-1316: Overall assessment: Comprehensive test suite with room for improvementThis test file provides extensive coverage of Redis Zset operations. However, there are several areas for improvement:
- Reconsider the use of
PDescribeinstead ofDescribe, as it may unintentionally skip tests.- Enhance some tests with additional edge cases and scenarios (e.g., ZCard, ZInterStore).
- Refactor tests that mix different functionalities (e.g., ZCount and ZLexCount).
- Move invalid command checks to separate, focused test cases.
- Address the numerous commented-out tests throughout the file.
- Consider adding more comprehensive tests for complex operations like ZUnionStore and ZInterStore.
Implementing these suggestions will result in a more robust, maintainable, and clear test suite for Redis Zset operations.
src/storage/src/redis_sets.cc (1)
64-65: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for the new parameter.The changes look good. The new
ts_msparameter allows returning the timestamp of the last modification, which is useful for tracking set changes.A minor suggestion:
Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the
ts_msparameter in the function signature or at the initialization point. This would improve code readability and maintainability.-Status Redis::SAdd(const Slice& key, const std::vector<std::string>& members, int32_t* ret, uint64_t& ts_ms) { - ts_ms = 0; +Status Redis::SAdd(const Slice& key, const std::vector<std::string>& members, int32_t* ret, uint64_t& ts_ms) { + // ts_ms will store the timestamp of the last modification + ts_ms = 0;Also applies to: 110-110
tests/integration/codis_test.go (1)
Line range hint
1-1984: General observations on the test suiteWhile reviewing this file, I noticed several points that might be worth addressing:
There are multiple commented-out test cases, particularly for commands not supported by Codis (e.g.,
SMove,SDiff,SInter). Consider either implementing these tests with Codis-specific behavior or removing them to keep the test suite clean.Several TODOs and references to GitHub issues are present throughout the file. It might be beneficial to create a tracking issue to address these over time.
The test coverage appears comprehensive for supported commands, which is commendable.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the cleanup and implementation of the commented-out tests?
src/storage/tests/hashes_test.cc (1)
Line range hint
1-1161: Summary of changes: Focused updates to HIncrby and HIncrbyfloat testsThe modifications in this file are consistently applied to the
HIncrbyandHIncrbyfloattest cases, adding anullptrparameter to each function call. These changes align with the PR objective of achieving idempotency and master-slave consistency. The focused nature of the updates, limited to these two functions, minimizes the risk of introducing unintended side effects in other parts of the test suite.To ensure comprehensive coverage of the changes, consider the following:
- Verify that no other hash-related functions require similar modifications for idempotency and master-slave consistency.
- Update the test documentation or comments to explain the purpose of the new
nullptrparameter, if not already done in the main implementation.- Consider adding new test cases that specifically target the idempotency and master-slave consistency aspects of these operations, if not covered elsewhere.
src/storage/tests/keys_test.cc (3)
Line range hint
88-3795: Comprehensive test cases for PKScanRange and PKRScanRange.The test cases for PKScanRange and PKRScanRange are extensive and cover various scenarios. However, there are a few points to consider:
- The tests are quite long and could benefit from being split into smaller, more focused test cases.
- Some of the test logic is repeated across different groups. Consider extracting common setup and verification code into helper functions.
- The use of sleep(2) and db.Compact(DataType::kAll, true) after each group of tests might slow down the test suite. Consider if this is necessary for every test group.
Consider refactoring these test cases to improve readability and maintainability:
- Split the large test cases into smaller, more focused ones.
- Extract common setup and verification code into helper functions.
- Evaluate the necessity of sleep and compact operations after each test group.
Line range hint
3797-4230: Comprehensive test cases for PKPatternMatchDel.The PKPatternMatchDel test cases are well-structured and cover various scenarios. However, similar to the previous test cases, they could benefit from some refactoring:
- There's a lot of repetitive code for setting up the test data. Consider creating helper functions to set up the test data for each data type.
- The deletion and verification logic is repeated across test groups. This could be extracted into a helper function.
Consider refactoring these test cases to reduce code duplication:
- Create helper functions for setting up test data for each data type (String, Hash, Set, List, ZSet).
- Extract the common deletion and verification logic into a helper function.
Line range hint
4232-4619: Well-structured test cases for Expire, Del, Exists, Expireat, Persist, and TTL.These test cases are generally well-structured and cover the basic functionality of each operation. However, there are a few points to consider:
- Some test cases, like ExpireTest, could benefit from more edge case testing (e.g., expiring already expired keys, setting very large expiration times).
- The DelTest only tests deleting a single key. Consider adding tests for deleting multiple keys and non-existent keys.
- The ExistsTest is very basic. Consider adding more comprehensive tests, including checking for non-existent keys and multiple keys.
Enhance these test cases by:
- Adding more edge cases to the ExpireTest.
- Expanding the DelTest to cover multiple keys and non-existent keys.
- Enhancing the ExistsTest with more comprehensive scenarios.
src/pika_hyperloglog.cc (1)
82-83: Clarify the use of 'RAW_ARGS_LEN' incontent.reserveIn
PfMergeCmd::ToRedisProtocol(), you callcontent.reserve(RAW_ARGS_LEN);but it's unclear whetherRAW_ARGS_LENaccurately represents the required capacity. This could lead to inefficient memory allocation ifRAW_ARGS_LENdoesn't match the actual content size.Consider calculating the required size based on the actual content to be appended or provide a comment explaining the choice of
RAW_ARGS_LEN.include/wal_edit.h (1)
133-170: Consider documenting thread-safety requirements more prominentlyWhile there is a comment indicating that
WalSetis not thread-safe and requires external synchronization, consider enhancing the documentation to make this requirement more prominent. This can help prevent misuse of the class in multithreaded contexts.include/pika_set.h (2)
41-64: Add documentation for the newPKSAddCmdclassThe
PKSAddCmdclass is introduced without any explanatory comments. Please add documentation to describe the purpose of this class, how it differs fromSAddCmd, and any specific behaviors it implements. This will improve code readability and assist future maintainers.
52-52: Remove or clarify the commented-outDoUpdateCache()methodThe
DoUpdateCache()method is commented out in thePKSAddCmdclass. If this method is not needed, consider removing it to keep the code clean. If it's intended for future use, add aTODOcomment explaining the pending implementation.src/storage/src/redis.h (1)
292-293: Reassess the necessity of passingkey_foundby referenceIn the
ZIncrbymethod, the parameterbool& key_foundis passed by reference. Sinceboolis a small and simple type, passing by value might be more appropriate unless the method needs to modify the variable outside its scope. Verify if passing by reference is required in this context.src/pika_zset.cc (5)
Line range hint
173-183: Fix incorrect error handling by referencing the correct status variables.In the
ZIncrbyCmd::Do()method, the error handling incorrectly referencess_instead of the local status variables, which holds the result of theZIncrbyoperation. This could lead to improper error reporting and handling.Apply this diff to correct the error handling:
void ZIncrbyCmd::Do() { double score = 0.0; rocksdb::Status s = db_->storage()->ZIncrby(key_, member_, by_, &score, &ts_ms_, &key_found_); if (s.ok()) { score_ = score; char buf[32]; int64_t len = pstd::d2string(buf, sizeof(buf), score); res_.AppendStringLen(len); res_.AppendContent(buf); AddSlotKey("z", key_, db_); - } else if (s_.IsInvalidArgument()) { + } else if (s.IsInvalidArgument()) { res_.SetRes(CmdRes::kMultiKey); - } else { - res_.SetRes(CmdRes::kErrOther, s_.ToString()); + } else { + res_.SetRes(CmdRes::kErrOther, s.ToString()); } }
Line range hint
1545-1584: Ensure consistent variable naming: renamemembers_del_tomembers_removed_.In the
ZRemrangebyscoreCmdclass, use a consistent variable name for the members being deleted. Renamemembers_del_tomembers_removed_to match the naming convention used elsewhere, enhancing code clarity.Apply this diff to rename the variable:
- std::vector<std::string> members_del_; + std::vector<std::string> members_removed_; s_ = db_->storage()->ZRemrangebyscore( key_, min_score_, max_score_, left_close_, right_close_, &count, - &members_del_); + &members_removed_);Also, update the
ToRedisProtocol()method accordingly:std::string ZRemrangebyscoreCmd::ToRedisProtocol() { std::string content; content.reserve(RAW_ARGS_LEN); - RedisAppendLen(content, 2 + members_del_.size(), "*"); + RedisAppendLen(content, 2 + members_removed_.size(), "*"); // to zrem cmd std::string zrem_cmd(kCmdNameZRem); RedisAppendLenUint64(content, zrem_cmd.size(), "$"); RedisAppendContent(content, zrem_cmd); // key RedisAppendLenUint64(content, key_.size(), "$"); RedisAppendContent(content, key_); // member - for (auto& m : members_del_) { + for (auto& m : members_removed_) { RedisAppendLenUint64(content, m.size(), "$"); RedisAppendContent(content, m); } return content; }
Line range hint
1606-1648: Unify variable naming inZRemrangebylexCmd: renamemembers_del_tomembers_removed_.For consistency across similar commands, rename the variable
members_del_tomembers_removed_in theZRemrangebylexCmdclass. This will enhance readability and maintainability.Apply this diff to rename the variable:
- std::vector<std::string> members_del_; + std::vector<std::string> members_removed_; s_ = db_->storage()->ZRemrangebylex( key_, min_member_, max_member_, left_close_, right_close_, &count, - &members_del_); + &members_removed_);Update the
ToRedisProtocol()method accordingly:std::string ZRemrangebylexCmd::ToRedisProtocol() { std::string content; content.reserve(RAW_ARGS_LEN); - RedisAppendLen(content, 2 + members_del_.size(), "*"); + RedisAppendLen(content, 2 + members_removed_.size(), "*"); // to zrem cmd std::string zrem_cmd(kCmdNameZRem); RedisAppendLenUint64(content, zrem_cmd.size(), "$"); RedisAppendContent(content, zrem_cmd); // key RedisAppendLenUint64(content, key_.size(), "$"); RedisAppendContent(content, key_); // member - for (auto& m : members_del_) { + for (auto& m : members_removed_) { RedisAppendLenUint64(content, m.size(), "$"); RedisAppendContent(content, m); } return content; }
Line range hint
1674-1707: Type inconsistency: useint64_tforcount_instead ofunsigned intinZPopmaxCmd.In
ZPopmaxCmd::DoInitial(), the variablecount_is being assigned usingpstd::string2int, which outputs anint64_t. However,count_is declared asunsigned int, leading to potential type mismatch and incorrect behavior with negative values.Apply this diff to correct the type:
- unsigned int count_; + int64_t count_; void ZPopmaxCmd::DoInitial() { // existing code if (argv_.size() == 3) { - if (pstd::string2int(argv_[2].data(), argv_[2].size(), static_cast<int64_t *>(&count_)) == 0) { + if (pstd::string2int(argv_[2].data(), argv_[2].size(), &count_) == 0) { res_.SetRes(CmdRes::kInvalidInt); } } }This ensures proper handling of the count value and prevents unexpected behavior.
Line range hint
1733-1767: Type inconsistency: useint64_tforcount_instead ofunsigned intinZPopminCmd.Similar to
ZPopmaxCmd, inZPopminCmd::DoInitial(), the variablecount_should be of typeint64_tto match the output ofpstd::string2intand handle potential negative values correctly.Apply this diff to correct the type:
- unsigned int count_; + int64_t count_; void ZPopminCmd::DoInitial() { // existing code if (argv_.size() == 3) { - if (pstd::string2int(argv_[2].data(), argv_[2].size(), static_cast<int64_t *>(&count_)) == 0) { + if (pstd::string2int(argv_[2].data(), argv_[2].size(), &count_) == 0) { res_.SetRes(CmdRes::kInvalidInt); } } }This change aligns the variable type with the function usage and ensures correct behavior.
src/storage/include/storage/storage.h (4)
293-293: Add documentation for the new methodPKZSetAtThe method
PKZSetAtis introduced without accompanying documentation. Please provide comments describing its functionality, parameters, and return value to improve maintainability.
374-374: Update method comments to reflect new parametersThe methods
HIncrby,HIncrbyfloat, andSAddhave been updated with an additionaluint64_t* ts_msparameter. Please update the corresponding method comments to include descriptions of the new parameter and its purpose.Also applies to: 386-386, 418-418
818-819: Ensure consistent naming for member deletion parametersIn
ZRemrangebyscore(lines 818-819) andZRemrangebylex(lines 948-949), the parameter for deleted members is namedmembers_del. To maintain consistency across similar methods, please ensure that parameter names follow the same convention. If you choosemembers_deleted, update all related methods accordingly.Also applies to: 948-949
1070-1071: Add documentation for the new methodHyperloglogSetThe new method
HyperloglogSetlacks documentation comments explaining its purpose and usage. Please add a description to maintain consistency and enhance code readability.src/pika_kv.cc (4)
490-492: Ensure Consistent Integer to String ConversionIn
DecrCmd::ToRedisProtocol(),time_stampis converted to a string usingstd::to_string, whereas elsewhere you usepstd::ll2stringfor integer conversion. Mixing different methods can lead to inconsistencies and potential issues with number formatting.Apply this diff to use
pstd::ll2stringconsistently:char buf[100]; auto time_stamp = ts_ms_ > 0 ? ts_ms_ / 1000 : ts_ms_; - std::string at(std::to_string(time_stamp)); + pstd::ll2string(buf, sizeof(buf), time_stamp); + std::string at(buf); RedisAppendLenUint64(content, at.size(), "$");
496-498: Optimize Variable Usage and ConsistencyThe variable
buf_2is declared but you are usingtmpto store the string representation ofnew_value_. For clarity and consistency, consider reusing the existing bufferbufor naming variables consistently.Apply this diff:
char buf[100]; - char buf_2[100]; - pstd::ll2string(buf_2, sizeof(buf_2), new_value_); - std::string tmp(buf_2); + pstd::ll2string(buf, sizeof(buf), new_value_); + std::string tmp(buf); RedisAppendLenUint64(content, tmp.size(), "$");
555-556: Ensure Consistent Integer to String ConversionSimilar to
DecrCmd, inDecrbyCmd::ToRedisProtocol(), ensure that integer to string conversions use a consistent method.Apply this diff:
char buf[100]; auto time_stamp = ts_ms_ > 0 ? ts_ms_ / 1000 : ts_ms_; - std::string at(std::to_string(time_stamp)); + pstd::ll2string(buf, sizeof(buf), time_stamp); + std::string at(buf);
490-490: Address the TODO Comment Regarding Precision LossThere's a TODO comment
// TODO 精度损失indicating potential precision loss during the timestamp calculation.Would you like assistance in addressing the potential precision loss when converting the timestamp? I can help ensure that the timestamp conversion maintains the necessary precision.
src/storage/src/redis_hashes.cc (2)
Line range hint
275-321: Unused parameterts_msinHIncrbyfunctionThe parameter
uint64_t* ts_msin theHIncrbyfunction is not assigned any value before the function returns. This may lead to undefined behavior if the caller expectsts_msto be set. Consider assigning a value to*ts_msor removing the parameter if it is not needed.
Line range hint
380-382: Typographical error in error messagesThe error messages contain a typo: "value is not a vaild float". The word "vaild" should be corrected to "valid".
Apply this diff to fix the typo:
- return Status::Corruption("value is not a vaild float"); + return Status::Corruption("value is not a valid float");Also applies to: 402-404
src/storage/src/redis_zsets.cc (3)
862-864: Correct variable naming: Renamemembers_deledtomembers_deletedThe variable name
members_deledseems to be a misspelling. Consider renaming it tomembers_deletedfor clarity and to adhere to standard naming conventions.Apply this diff to correct the variable name:
-if (members_deled) { - members_deled->emplace_back(parsed_zsets_score_key.member().data(), parsed_zsets_score_key.member().size()); +if (members_deleted) { + members_deleted->emplace_back(parsed_zsets_score_key.member().data(), parsed_zsets_score_key.member().size());Ensure all occurrences are updated accordingly.
943-945: Clarify variable name: Renamemember_deltomembers_deletedThe variable
member_delsuggests a single member, but it holds multiple entries. Consider renaming it tomembers_deletedfor better readability and to accurately reflect its purpose.Apply this diff to rename the variable:
-if (member_del) { - member_del->emplace_back(parsed_zsets_score_key.member().data(), parsed_zsets_score_key.member().size()); +if (members_deleted) { + members_deleted->emplace_back(parsed_zsets_score_key.member().data(), parsed_zsets_score_key.member().size());Ensure all references are updated accordingly.
1643-1645: Consistent variable naming: Renamemember_deltomembers_deletedThe variable
member_delis used to store multiple members. Renaming it tomembers_deletedenhances clarity and aligns with naming conventions.Apply this diff to update the variable name:
-if (member_del) { - member_del->emplace_back(parsed_zsets_member_key.member().data(), parsed_zsets_member_key.member().size()); +if (members_deleted) { + members_deleted->emplace_back(parsed_zsets_member_key.member().data(), parsed_zsets_member_key.member().size());Ensure all instances are updated throughout the codebase.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (33)
- include/pika_cache.h (2 hunks)
- include/pika_command.h (4 hunks)
- include/pika_hash.h (3 hunks)
- include/pika_hyperloglog.h (2 hunks)
- include/pika_kv.h (3 hunks)
- include/pika_set.h (3 hunks)
- include/pika_zset.h (7 hunks)
- include/wal_edit.h (1 hunks)
- src/net/src/worker_thread.cc (1 hunks)
- src/pika_cache.cc (1 hunks)
- src/pika_command.cc (4 hunks)
- src/pika_hash.cc (5 hunks)
- src/pika_hyperloglog.cc (1 hunks)
- src/pika_kv.cc (4 hunks)
- src/pika_set.cc (6 hunks)
- src/pika_slot_command.cc (2 hunks)
- src/pika_zset.cc (12 hunks)
- src/storage/include/storage/storage.h (8 hunks)
- src/storage/src/redis.h (5 hunks)
- src/storage/src/redis_hashes.cc (3 hunks)
- src/storage/src/redis_sets.cc (2 hunks)
- src/storage/src/redis_strings.cc (2 hunks)
- src/storage/src/redis_zsets.cc (9 hunks)
- src/storage/src/storage.cc (11 hunks)
- src/storage/tests/hashes_test.cc (12 hunks)
- src/storage/tests/keys_test.cc (39 hunks)
- src/storage/tests/sets_test.cc (73 hunks)
- src/storage/tests/strings_test.cc (4 hunks)
- src/storage/tests/zsets_test.cc (74 hunks)
- tests/integration/codis_test.go (1 hunks)
- tests/integration/replication_test.go (1 hunks)
- tests/integration/rsync_dynamic_reconfig.go (1 hunks)
- tests/integration/zset_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (161)
tests/integration/rsync_dynamic_reconfig.go (1)
114-114: Approved change, but clarification needed onPDescribe.The change from
DescribetoPDescribehas been noted. This modification likely affects how the test suite is executed or marked in the test runner, without altering the internal logic of the tests.Could you please clarify:
- What does the 'P' in
PDescribestand for? (e.g., Parallel, Pending)- What are the implications of this change on test execution?
- Is this part of a larger effort to optimize or reorganize the test suite?
Additionally, please ensure that any relevant documentation is updated to reflect this change in the testing framework usage.
To verify the consistency of this change across the codebase, you can run the following command:
This will help us understand if this change is part of a broader pattern or an isolated modification.
Verification successful
Change Verified:
PDescribeusage is consistent across the codebase.The replacement of
DescribewithPDescribeinrsync_dynamic_reconfig.goaligns with its usage in other test files, indicating it's an established convention within the project. This change is consistent and does not adversely affect the test suite's functionality.Please ensure that the purpose of
PDescribeis documented in the project's testing guidelines for clarity.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other occurrences of PDescribe and Describe echo "Occurrences of PDescribe:" rg --type go "PDescribe\(" tests/ echo "Occurrences of Describe:" rg --type go "Describe\(" tests/Length of output: 3840
src/net/src/worker_thread.cc (1)
212-212: Approve: Good practice for pointer safetyThis change is a positive addition to the code. Setting
in_conntonullptrat the end of each iteration in the event processing loop is a good defensive programming practice. It ensures that:
- There's no risk of accidentally using a stale connection pointer in subsequent iterations.
- It makes the code more robust against potential future modifications that might inadvertently use
in_connoutside its intended scope.- It clearly signifies the end of the connection's lifecycle within the current iteration.
This change enhances the overall safety and clarity of the code without introducing any noticeable performance overhead.
include/pika_cache.h (1)
26-26: LGTM: Forward declaration of PKZSetAtCmd classThe addition of the
PKZSetAtCmdclass forward declaration is appropriate. It helps prevent circular dependencies and is a common practice in C++ header files.include/pika_command.h (4)
123-123: LGTM. Consider adding documentation for the new command.The new constant
kCmdNamePKHSetAtfollows the existing naming conventions and appears to be a Pika-specific command for hash operations. To improve maintainability, consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose and functionality of this new command.
171-171: LGTM. Consider adding documentation for the new command.The new constant
kCmdNamePKZSetAtfollows the existing naming conventions and appears to be a Pika-specific command for sorted set operations. To improve maintainability, consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose and functionality of this new command.
194-194: LGTM. Consider adding documentation for the new command.The new constant
kCmdNamePKSAddfollows the existing naming conventions and appears to be a Pika-specific command for set operations. To improve maintainability, consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose and functionality of this new command, especially how it differs from the standard Redis SADD command.
221-221: LGTM. Consider adding documentation for the new command.The new constant
kCmdNamePKHyperloglogSetfollows the existing naming conventions and appears to be a Pika-specific command for HyperLogLog operations. To improve maintainability, consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose and functionality of this new command, especially how it differs from the standard Redis HyperLogLog commands.include/pika_kv.h (1)
267-268: LGTM! Please provide details aboutDoInitial().The reintroduction of
DoInitial()and addition ofToRedisProtocol()method enhance the functionality of theAppendCmdclass and maintain consistency with other command classes.Could you please provide more information about the
DoInitial()method? Specifically:
- What initialization logic does it perform?
- Why was it previously removed and now reintroduced?
This information will help ensure that the reintroduction of this method is necessary and doesn't duplicate functionality that might exist elsewhere in the class hierarchy.
src/storage/tests/strings_test.cc (1)
217-217: LGTM! Verify Decrby method signature in main codebase.The changes to the
DecrbyTestfunction look good. Thenullptrparameter has been consistently added to alldb.Decrbycalls, which likely reflects an update to theDecrbymethod signature in the main codebase.To ensure consistency, please run the following script to verify the
Decrbymethod signature in the main codebase:This will help confirm that the
Decrbymethod in the main codebase matches the updated usage in the test file.Also applies to: 224-224, 230-230, 243-243, 258-258, 272-272
tests/integration/replication_test.go (1)
Line range hint
1-1000: Overall assessment of the changes and test suiteThe primary change in this PR (switching to
PDescribe) needs to be addressed as it could significantly alter test execution.While not directly related to the changes in this PR, there are opportunities to improve the overall test suite structure and reliability. These improvements could be considered for future refactoring efforts.
The changes can be approved once the
PDescribeissue is addressed. Consider opening separate issues for the suggested improvements to the test suite structure and reliability.src/storage/src/redis_strings.cc (2)
304-304: Timestamp assignment looks good.The assignment of the timestamp to
*ts_msis correctly placed after retrieving it from the parsed string value.
Line range hint
277-304: Overall, the changes to theDecrbyfunction are well-implemented.The addition of timestamp support to the
Decrbyoperation is a good improvement. The changes are minimal, focused, and consistent with the existing code structure. They should provide better tracking capabilities for decremented values.tests/integration/zset_test.go (2)
Line range hint
1031-1072: LGTM: ZAdd test is comprehensive and correct.This test thoroughly covers the ZAdd functionality, including adding new members, updating scores of existing members, and verifying the final state of the sorted set using ZRangeWithScores. The assertions are appropriate and cover all necessary cases.
Line range hint
1120-1146: LGTM: ZIncrBy test is well-implemented.This test effectively covers the ZIncrBy functionality. It demonstrates:
- Correct score incrementation for existing members.
- Proper maintenance of set order after score changes.
- Accurate retrieval of updated set contents.
The test structure and assertions are appropriate and thorough.
src/pika_command.cc (4)
393-396: LGTM. Consider adding documentation for the new command.The addition of the
PKHSetAtcommand looks good. It appears to be a variant of the HSet command, possibly allowing setting a hash field at a specific time. The flags and argument count are appropriate for this type of operation.To improve maintainability, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose and usage of this new command, especially how it differs from the standard HSet command.
534-537: LGTM. Consider adding documentation for the new command.The addition of the
PKZSetAtcommand is appropriate. It appears to be a new operation for sorted sets, possibly allowing setting a member with a score at a specific time. The flags and argument count are suitable for this type of operation.To enhance code clarity and maintainability, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose, usage, and parameter structure of this new command, particularly how it differs from the standard ZAdd command.
623-626: LGTM. Consider adding documentation for the new command.The addition of the
PKSAddcommand is appropriate. It appears to be a variant of the SAdd command, maintaining the ability to add multiple members to a set. The flags and argument structure are suitable for this type of operation.To improve code clarity and maintainability, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose and usage of this new command, especially how it differs from or extends the functionality of the standard SAdd command.
Line range hint
1-722: Overall, the new command additions enhance Pika's functionality.The introduction of PKHSetAt, PKZSetAt, PKSAdd, and PKHyperloglogSet commands extends the capabilities of Pika for hash sets, sorted sets, sets, and HyperLogLog data structures. These additions appear to be part of a broader effort to introduce time-based or enhanced versions of existing commands.
To further improve the code:
- Add documentation for each new command to explain their purpose, usage, and how they differ from their standard counterparts.
- Ensure consistency in flag usage, particularly regarding execution speed (fast vs. slow).
- Consider adding tests for these new commands to ensure they work as expected and integrate well with existing functionality.
To ensure these new commands are properly integrated, let's check if they're being used or referenced elsewhere in the codebase:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of new commands in other files echo "Searching for PKHSetAt usage:" rg "PKHSetAt" --type cpp echo "Searching for PKZSetAt usage:" rg "PKZSetAt" --type cpp echo "Searching for PKSAdd usage:" rg "PKSAdd" --type cpp echo "Searching for PKHyperloglogSet usage:" rg "PKHyperloglogSet" --type cppsrc/storage/tests/sets_test.cc (17)
131-132: Approve consistent changeThe addition of the
nullptrparameter to thisSAddmethod call is consistent with the previous change and maintains uniformity across the test file.
142-143: Approve consistent modificationThe addition of the
nullptrparameter to thisSAddmethod call is in line with the previous changes, maintaining consistency throughout the test file.
157-158: Approve consistent updateThe addition of the
nullptrparameter to thisSAddmethod call maintains consistency with the previous changes and the updated method signature.
164-165: Approve consistent modificationThe addition of the
nullptrparameter to thisSAddmethod call is consistent with the previous changes and the updated method signature.
175-176: Approve consistent updateThe addition of the
nullptrparameter to thisSAddmethod call maintains consistency with the previous changes and the updated method signature.
195-201: Approve consistent modificationsThe addition of the
nullptrparameter to theseSAddmethod calls is consistent with the previous changes and the updated method signature. These modifications maintain uniformity across the test file without altering the test logic.
244-250: Approve consistent updatesThe addition of the
nullptrparameter to theseSAddmethod calls maintains consistency with the previous changes and the updated method signature. These modifications ensure uniformity across the test file without changing the test logic.
264-265: Approve consistent modificationThe addition of the
nullptrparameter to thisSAddmethod call is in line with the previous changes and the updated method signature, maintaining consistency throughout the test file.
282-289: Approve consistent updatesThe addition of the
nullptrparameter to theseSAddmethod calls is consistent with the previous changes and the updated method signature. These modifications maintain uniformity across the test file without altering the test logic.
308-315: Approve consistent modificationsThe addition of the
nullptrparameter to theseSAddmethod calls maintains consistency with the previous changes and the updated method signature. These updates ensure uniformity across the test file without changing the test logic.
354-361: Approve consistent updatesThe addition of the
nullptrparameter to theseSAddmethod calls is in line with the previous changes and the updated method signature. These modifications maintain consistency throughout the test file without altering the test logic.
417-423: Approve consistent modificationsThe addition of the
nullptrparameter to theseSAddmethod calls is consistent with the previous changes and the updated method signature. These updates ensure uniformity across the test file without changing the test logic.
441-442: Approve consistent updateThe addition of the
nullptrparameter to thisSAddmethod call maintains consistency with the previous changes and the updated method signature.
463-469: Approve consistent modificationsThe addition of the
nullptrparameter to theseSAddmethod calls is in line with the previous changes and the updated method signature. These updates maintain uniformity across the test file without altering the test logic.
495-504: Approve consistent updatesThe addition of the
nullptrparameter to theseSAddmethod calls maintains consistency with the previous changes and the updated method signature. These modifications ensure uniformity across the test file without changing the test logic.
526-532: Approve consistent modifications and summarize changesThe addition of the
nullptrparameter to theseSAddmethod calls is consistent with the previous changes and the updated method signature. These updates maintain uniformity across the test file without altering the test logic.Overall, these changes reflect a systematic update to the
SAddmethod signature throughout the entire test file. This consistency ensures that all test cases are aligned with the new method signature, likely introduced in the main codebase. The modifications do not alter the logic or purpose of the tests, but rather adapt them to work with the updatedSAddmethod.
124-125: Approve change and verify SAdd signatureThe addition of the
nullptrparameter to theSAddmethod call is consistent with the reported changes. This modification doesn't alter the test logic but reflects an update in the method signature.To ensure this change is applied consistently, please run the following command to check all
SAddmethod calls in the codebase:Verification successful
Verification Successful:
nullptrParameter Consistently AppliedAll instances of the
db.SAddmethod across the codebase have been updated to include thenullptrparameter, ensuring consistency with the updated method signature.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
rg --type cpp "db\.SAdd\(" -A 1Length of output: 45444
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Searching for SAdd calls without nullptr in examples/ ast-grep --lang cpp --pattern $'db\.SAdd($_, $$$, $_)' examples/Length of output: 122
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Searching for SAdd calls without nullptr in sets_example.cc ast-grep --lang cpp --pattern $'db\.SAdd($_, $$$, $_)' src/storage/examples/sets_example.ccLength of output: 92
tests/integration/codis_test.go (1)
15-15: Consider the implications of changing toPDescribeThe test suite declaration has been changed from
DescribetoPDescribe. This modification typically indicates that the entire "List Commands Codis" test suite is now pending or focused, depending on the testing framework's behavior.To ensure this change is intentional and understand its impact, please run the following command:
This will help verify if this is a isolated change or part of a broader modification to the test suite structure.
Verification successful
Change to
PDescribeis consistent across multiple test suitesThe modification from
DescribetoPDescribeintests/integration/codis_test.goaligns with similar changes in other test files. This suggests that the change is intentional and is being applied consistently across the test suite.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for other occurrences of PDescribe and compare with Describe echo "PDescribe occurrences:" rg --type go "PDescribe\(" tests/ echo "Describe occurrences:" rg --type go "Describe\(" tests/Length of output: 3828
src/storage/tests/hashes_test.cc (2)
Line range hint
266-341: LGTM! Verify HIncrby implementation in the main codebase.The changes to the
HIncrbyfunction calls, adding anullptrparameter, have been consistently applied across all test cases. This modification aligns with the PR objective of achieving idempotency and master-slave consistency.To ensure the changes are correctly implemented in the main codebase, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the HIncrby function signature in the main codebase # Search for the HIncrby function definition echo "Searching for HIncrby function definition:" rg --type cpp "Status\s+HIncrby\s*\([^)]*\)" src/ # Search for HIncrby function calls in the main codebase echo "Searching for HIncrby function calls:" rg --type cpp "HIncrby\s*\([^)]*\)" src/ -g '!*test*'
Line range hint
355-516: LGTM! Verify HIncrbyfloat implementation in the main codebase.The changes to the
HIncrbyfloatfunction calls, adding anullptrparameter, have been consistently applied across all test cases. This modification aligns with the PR objective of achieving idempotency and master-slave consistency.To ensure the changes are correctly implemented in the main codebase, please run the following script:
Verification successful
HIncrbyfloat Function Signature Verified
The addition of the
nullptrparameter in allHIncrbyfloatfunction calls aligns correctly with the updated function signatures in the main codebase. All changes have been consistently applied across the test cases.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the HIncrbyfloat function signature in the main codebase # Search for the HIncrbyfloat function definition echo "Searching for HIncrbyfloat function definition:" rg --type cpp "Status\s+HIncrbyfloat\s*\([^)]*\)" src/ # Search for HIncrbyfloat function calls in the main codebase echo "Searching for HIncrbyfloat function calls:" rg --type cpp "HIncrbyfloat\s*\([^)]*\)" src/ -g '!*test*'Length of output: 2029
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the HIncrbyfloat function signature in the main codebase # Search for the HIncrbyfloat function definition echo "Searching for HIncrbyfloat function definition:" rg --type cpp "Status\s+HIncrbyfloat\s*\([^)]*\)" src/ # Search for HIncrbyfloat function calls in the main codebase echo "Searching for HIncrbyfloat function calls:" rg --type cpp "HIncrbyfloat\s*\([^)]*\)" src/ -g '!*test*'Length of output: 1586
src/storage/tests/keys_test.cc (5)
Line range hint
1-5: LGTM: Appropriate copyright and license information.The copyright and license information is correctly placed at the beginning of the file.
Line range hint
7-20: LGTM: Necessary includes and namespace usage.The file includes all necessary headers and uses the appropriate namespaces. The use of
using namespace storageis acceptable in a test file, but it's generally better to avoidusing namespacein production code.
Line range hint
22-55: LGTM: Well-structured test fixture setup.The
KeysTestfixture is well-structured with appropriateSetUpandTearDownmethods. It properly initializes the database for each test and cleans up afterwards.
Line range hint
57-86: LGTM: Helper functions for test setup.The helper functions
make_expired,key_value_match, andkey_matchare well-implemented and useful for the test cases. They improve code readability and reusability across different test cases.
Line range hint
4621-4639: LGTM: Main function setup.The main function is well-structured, setting up logging and initializing the Google Test framework correctly.
src/storage/tests/zsets_test.cc (86)
955-957: Method signature update for ZIncrbySimilar to the previous change, this ZIncrby call has been updated with two additional nullptr parameters.
959-961: Method signature update for ZIncrbyThis ZIncrby call has also been updated with two additional nullptr parameters, maintaining consistency with the previous changes.
974-976: Method signature update for ZIncrbyThe ZIncrby method call in this test case has been updated to include two additional nullptr parameters, consistent with the previous changes.
978-980: Method signature update for ZIncrbyAnother instance of ZIncrby method call updated with two additional nullptr parameters.
982-984: Method signature update for ZIncrbyThis ZIncrby call has also been updated with two additional nullptr parameters, maintaining consistency across the test file.
986-988: Method signature update for ZIncrbyThe ZIncrby method call here has been updated to include two additional nullptr parameters, consistent with the previous changes.
1005-1009: Method signature update for ZIncrbyThis ZIncrby call has been updated with two additional nullptr parameters. The change is consistent with previous modifications in this file.
1011-1015: Method signature update for ZIncrbyAnother instance of ZIncrby method call updated with two additional nullptr parameters, maintaining consistency across the test file.
1017-1021: Method signature update for ZIncrbyThis ZIncrby call has also been updated with two additional nullptr parameters, consistent with the previous changes in this file.
1024-1028: Method signature update for ZIncrbyThe ZIncrby method call here has been updated to include two additional nullptr parameters, maintaining consistency with previous changes.
1032-1036: Method signature update for ZIncrbyThis ZIncrby call has been updated with two additional nullptr parameters, consistent with the previous modifications in this file.
Line range hint
1038-1042: Method signature update for ZIncrbyAnother instance of ZIncrby method call updated with two additional nullptr parameters, maintaining consistency across the test file.
Line range hint
1050-1054: Method signature update for ZIncrbyThis ZIncrby call has also been updated with two additional nullptr parameters, consistent with the previous changes in this file.
Line range hint
1075-1079: Method signature update for ZIncrbyThe ZIncrby method call here has been updated to include two additional nullptr parameters, maintaining consistency with previous changes.
1871-1873: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankThis ZRemrangebyrank call has been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous change.
1892-1894: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankAnother instance of ZRemrangebyrank method call updated with an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency across the test file.
1912-1914: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankThis ZRemrangebyrank call has also been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous changes in this file.
1932-1934: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankThe ZRemrangebyrank method call here has been updated to include an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency with previous changes.
1952-1954: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankThis ZRemrangebyrank call has been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous modifications in this file.
1972-1974: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankAnother instance of ZRemrangebyrank method call updated with an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency across the test file.
1992-1994: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankThis ZRemrangebyrank call has also been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous changes in this file.
2012-2014: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankThe ZRemrangebyrank method call here has been updated to include an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency with previous changes.
2034-2036: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankThis ZRemrangebyrank call has been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous modifications in this file.
2056-2058: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankAnother instance of ZRemrangebyrank method call updated with an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency across the test file.
2078-2080: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankThis ZRemrangebyrank call has also been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous changes in this file.
2100-2102: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankThe ZRemrangebyrank method call here has been updated to include an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency with previous changes.
2120-2122: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankThis ZRemrangebyrank call has been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous modifications in this file.
2140-2142: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankAnother instance of ZRemrangebyrank method call updated with an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency across the test file.
2160-2162: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankThis ZRemrangebyrank call has also been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous changes in this file.
2180-2182: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankThe ZRemrangebyrank method call here has been updated to include an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency with previous changes.
2200-2202: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankThis ZRemrangebyrank call has been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous modifications in this file.
2220-2222: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankAnother instance of ZRemrangebyrank method call updated with an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency across the test file.
2241-2243: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankThis ZRemrangebyrank call has also been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous changes in this file.
2262-2264: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankThe ZRemrangebyrank method call here has been updated to include an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency with previous changes.
2283-2285: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankThis ZRemrangebyrank call has been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous modifications in this file.
2304-2306: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankAnother instance of ZRemrangebyrank method call updated with an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency across the test file.
2324-2326: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankThis ZRemrangebyrank call has also been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous changes in this file.
2344-2346: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankThe ZRemrangebyrank method call here has been updated to include an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency with previous changes.
2364-2366: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankThis ZRemrangebyrank call has been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous modifications in this file.
2384-2386: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankAnother instance of ZRemrangebyrank method call updated with an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency across the test file.
2404-2406: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankThis ZRemrangebyrank call has also been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous changes in this file.
2425-2427: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankThe ZRemrangebyrank method call here has been updated to include an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency with previous changes.
2432-2435: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankThis ZRemrangebyrank call has been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous modifications in this file.
2497-2499: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyscoreThis ZRemrangebyscore call has been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous change.
2544-2545: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyscoreAnother instance of ZRemrangebyscore method call updated with an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency across the test file.
2589-2591: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyscoreThis ZRemrangebyscore call has also been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous changes in this file.
2630-2631: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyscoreThe ZRemrangebyscore method call here has been updated to include an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency with previous changes.
2675-2677: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyscoreThis ZRemrangebyscore call has been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous modifications in this file.
2719-2721: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyscoreAnother instance of ZRemrangebyscore method call updated with an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency across the test file.
2765-2767: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyscoreThis ZRemrangebyscore call has also been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous changes in this file.
2809-2811: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyscoreThe ZRemrangebyscore method call here has been updated to include an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency with previous changes.
2850-2852: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyscoreThis ZRemrangebyscore call has been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous modifications in this file.
2899-2901: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyscoreAnother instance of ZRemrangebyscore method call updated with an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency across the test file.
2907-2909: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyscoreThis ZRemrangebyscore call has also been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous changes in this file.
2919-2921: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyscoreThe ZRemrangebyscore method call here has been updated to include an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency with previous changes.
2948-2949: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyscoreThis ZRemrangebyscore call has been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous modifications in this file.
2995-2996: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyscoreAnother instance of ZRemrangebyscore method call updated with an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency across the test file.
3041-3042: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyscoreThis ZRemrangebyscore call has also been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous changes in this file.
4463-4465: Method signature update for ZRemrangebylexThis ZRemrangebylex call has been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous change.
4478-4480: Method signature update for ZRemrangebylexAnother instance of ZRemrangebylex method call updated with an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency across the test file.
4493-4495: Method signature update for ZRemrangebylexThis ZRemrangebylex call has also been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous changes in this file.
4508-4510: Method signature update for ZRemrangebylexThe ZRemrangebylex method call here has been updated to include an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency with previous changes.
4523-4525: Method signature update for ZRemrangebylexThis ZRemrangebylex call has been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous modifications in this file.
4539-4541: Method signature update for ZRemrangebylexAnother instance of ZRemrangebylex method call updated with an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency across the test file.
4555-4557: Method signature update for ZRemrangebylexThis ZRemrangebylex call has also been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous changes in this file.
4571-4573: Method signature update for ZRemrangebylexThe ZRemrangebylex method call here has been updated to include an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency with previous changes.
4587-4589: Method signature update for ZRemrangebylexThis ZRemrangebylex call has been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous modifications in this file.
4604-4606: Method signature update for ZRemrangebylexAnother instance of ZRemrangebylex method call updated with an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency across the test file.
4621-4623: Method signature update for ZRemrangebylexThis ZRemrangebylex call has also been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous changes in this file.
4638-4640: Method signature update for ZRemrangebylexThe ZRemrangebylex method call here has been updated to include an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency with previous changes.
4653-4655: Method signature update for ZRemrangebylexThis ZRemrangebylex call has been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous modifications in this file.
4668-4670: Method signature update for ZRemrangebylexAnother instance of ZRemrangebylex method call updated with an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency across the test file.
4683-4685: Method signature update for ZRemrangebylexThis ZRemrangebylex call has also been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous changes in this file.
4698-4700: Method signature update for ZRemrangebylexThe ZRemrangebylex method call here has been updated to include an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency with previous changes.
4713-4715: Method signature update for ZRemrangebylexThis ZRemrangebylex call has been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous modifications in this file.
4728-4730: Method signature update for ZRemrangebylexAnother instance of ZRemrangebylex method call updated with an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency across the test file.
4743-4745: Method signature update for ZRemrangebylexThis ZRemrangebylex call has also been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous changes in this file.
4758-4760: Method signature update for ZRemrangebylexThe ZRemrangebylex method call here has been updated to include an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency with previous changes.
4774-4776: Method signature update for ZRemrangebylexThis ZRemrangebylex call has been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous modifications in this file.
4791-4793: Method signature update for ZRemrangebylexAnother instance of ZRemrangebylex method call updated with an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency across the test file.
4807-4809: Method signature update for ZRemrangebylexThis ZRemrangebylex call has also been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous changes in this file.
4825-4827: Method signature update for ZRemrangebylexThe ZRemrangebylex method call here has been updated to include an additional nullptr parameter, maintaining consistency with previous changes.
4830-4832: Method signature update for ZRemrangebylexThis ZRemrangebylex call has been updated with an additional nullptr parameter, consistent with the previous modifications in this file.
1851-1853: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyrankThe ZRemrangebyrank method now includes an additional nullptr parameter. This change is consistent with the AI-generated summary and likely reflects an update in the underlying implementation.
However, it's important to verify that this change is consistent across all usages of ZRemrangebyrank in the codebase.
#!/bin/bash # Search for all occurrences of ZRemrangebyrank to ensure consistent usage rg --type cpp "ZRemrangebyrank\s*\([^)]*\)" -g '!tests/*'
4448-4450: Method signature update for ZRemrangebylexThe ZRemrangebylex method now includes an additional nullptr parameter. This change is consistent with the pattern observed in other method updates and likely reflects an update in the underlying implementation.
However, it's important to verify that this change is consistent across all usages of ZRemrangebylex in the codebase.
#!/bin/bash # Search for all occurrences of ZRemrangebylex to ensure consistent usage rg --type cpp "ZRemrangebylex\s*\([^)]*\)" -g '!tests/*'
2468-2470: Method signature update for ZRemrangebyscoreThe ZRemrangebyscore method now includes an additional nullptr parameter. This change is consistent with the AI-generated summary and likely reflects an update in the underlying implementation.
However, it's important to verify that this change is consistent across all usages of ZRemrangebyscore in the codebase.
include/wal_edit.h (2)
25-49: Well-structuredWalMetadataclassThe
WalMetadataclass is well-designed with clear constructors and member functions for managing WAL metadata. The use ofkUnknownWalSizeas a sentinel value for unknown sizes is appropriate, and the class provides intuitive methods for size management.
101-104: Verify the use of 0 as a sentinel value inWalDeletionIn the
WalDeletionclass,kEmptyis defined asstatic constexpr WalNumber kEmpty = 0and is used to indicate an empty deletion. Ensure thatWalNumbervalues start from 1 and that 0 is not a valid WAL number in your system. If 0 could be a valid WAL number, consider using a different sentinel value or refactoring to usestd::optional<WalNumber>to represent the absence of a value.Run the following script to check for usages of
WalNumberwith a value of 0:include/pika_set.h (1)
37-37: Verify the usage of thets_ms_member variableThe member variable
uint64_t ts_ms_{0};has been added. Ensure that this timestamp is properly utilized within the class methods to maintain consistency and correctness.Run the following script to check where
ts_ms_is used:Verification successful
Usage of
ts_ms_verified and properly utilized within thePikaSetclass methods.
include/pika_set.h: Declaration ofts_ms_.src/pika_set.cc: Multiple references ensure timestamp consistency and correctness.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all references to `ts_ms_` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `ts_ms_` in implementation files. rg --type cpp --word-regexp 'ts_ms_'Length of output: 2348
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all method implementations within the `PikaSet` class that use `ts_ms_`. ast-grep --lang cpp --pattern $'class PikaSet { $$$ method $_ { $$$ ts_ms_ $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 100
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all usages of `ts_ms_` within the `PikaSet` class implementations. rg --context 2 --type cpp 'ts_ms_' include/pika_set.h src/pika_set.ccLength of output: 1795
include/pika_hash.h (4)
110-133: New command classPKHSetAtCmdis well-defined and consistent.The class
PKHSetAtCmdis properly defined, following the coding patterns and conventions of the codebase. It correctly overrides necessary virtual methods and declares all required members.
174-174: AddedToRedisProtocol()method toHIncrbyCmd.The addition of
ToRedisProtocol()enhances the command by allowing it to generate Redis protocol-compliant responses. Ensure the implementation in the source file correctly formats the output according to the Redis protocol specifications.
199-199: AddedToRedisProtocol()method toHIncrbyfloatCmd.Including
ToRedisProtocol()inHIncrbyfloatCmdenables the command to produce Redis protocol-compliant outputs. Confirm that the implementation correctly handles floating-point values according to Redis specifications.
202-203: Member variables inHIncrbyfloatCmdare appropriately declared.The new member variables
new_value_str_andts_ms_are properly declared andts_ms_is initialized to0. Ensure thatnew_value_str_is assigned a valid string before use to avoid any potential issues.Also applies to: 205-205
src/pika_set.cc (2)
27-27: Verify handling ofnullptrargument inSAddfunction.In
SAddCmd::Do(), theSAddmethod is called withnullptras the last argument:s_ = db_->storage()->SAdd(key_, members_, &count, nullptr);Ensure that the
SAddfunction is designed to handle anullptrfor its last parameter without causing any null pointer dereferences or unexpected behavior.
400-400: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionImprove comment clarity and grammar.
The comment in line 400 can be rephrased for better understanding:
Apply this diff to update the comment:
- //The union/diff/inter operation got an empty set, just exec del to simulate overwrite an empty set to dest_key + // If the union/diff/inter operation results in an empty set, execute 'DEL' to simulate overwriting the destination key with an empty setLikely invalid or redundant comment.
include/pika_zset.h (10)
131-131: AddingToRedisProtocol()method toZIncrbyCmdThe addition of
ToRedisProtocol()enhances protocol handling forZIncrbyCmd, improving serialization and command representation.
137-138: Initialize new member variables inZIncrbyCmdEnsure that
ts_ms_andkey_found_are properly set during initialization and used appropriately to maintain correct command behavior.
593-593: AddingToRedisProtocol()method toZRemrangebyscoreCmdThe addition of
ToRedisProtocol()enhances protocol handling forZRemrangebyscoreCmd, improving serialization and command representation.
600-601: Ensure proper usage ofmembers_del_inZRemrangebyscoreCmdVerify that
members_del_is correctly managed throughout the command execution to prevent unintended side effects.
621-621: AddingToRedisProtocol()method toZRemrangebylexCmdThe addition of
ToRedisProtocol()enhances protocol handling forZRemrangebylexCmd, improving serialization and command representation.
628-628: Ensure proper usage ofmembers_del_inZRemrangebylexCmdVerify that
members_del_is correctly managed throughout the command execution to prevent unintended side effects.
646-646: AddingToRedisProtocol()method toZPopmaxCmdThe addition of
ToRedisProtocol()enhances protocol handling forZPopmaxCmd, improving serialization and command representation.
651-652: Ensure proper usage ofmembers_del_inZPopmaxCmdVerify that
members_del_is correctly managed throughout the command execution to prevent unintended side effects.
668-668: AddingToRedisProtocol()method toZPopminCmdThe addition of
ToRedisProtocol()enhances protocol handling forZPopminCmd, improving serialization and command representation.
673-674: Ensure proper usage ofmembers_del_inZPopminCmdVerify that
members_del_is correctly managed throughout the command execution to prevent unintended side effects.src/pika_hash.cc (5)
Line range hint
265-273: Code Update inHIncrbyCmd::Do()MethodThe update to the
HIncrbyCmd::Do()method correctly adds thets_ms_parameter to capture the timestamp from the storage layer. The method now handles the new value and timestamp appropriately, ensuring accurate operation.
Line range hint
334-344: Update inHIncrbyfloatCmd::Do()MethodThe
HIncrbyfloatCmd::Do()method now includes thets_ms_timestamp parameter, aligning with the changes made in the corresponding integer increment command. The handling ofnew_value_str_and the response construction are correctly implemented.
363-394: Validate String Conversions inHIncrbyfloatCmd::ToRedisProtocol()The
ToRedisProtocol()method properly constructs the Redis protocol response, including the conversion of floating-point values to strings and appending the timestamp. Ensure that all string conversions are safe and handle edge cases, such as very large or precise floating-point numbers.
969-986: Review Timestamp Logic inPKHSetAtCmd::Do()The check
if (ts_ms_ != 0 && ts_ms_ < pstd::NowMillis())aborts the operation if the provided timestamp is in the past. Verify that this behavior aligns with the intended application logic, ensuring that expired timestamps should indeed prevent the operation.
289-321: Ensure Buffer Safety inHIncrbyCmd::ToRedisProtocol()The
ToRedisProtocol()method constructs the Redis protocol string effectively. However, confirm that the bufferbuf[100]used inpstd::ll2string(buf, 100, time_stamp);is of sufficient size to handle the largest possible timestamp values to prevent any potential buffer overflows.Run the following script to check the maximum length of the timestamp string:
This script outputs the character count of the maximum plausible timestamp, which should be less than 100.
Verification successful
Buffer Size Adequate for Timestamp Conversion
The verification confirms that the maximum length of the timestamp string is 16 characters, which is well within the buffer size of 100. No potential buffer overflow issues detected.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the maximum length of the timestamp string # Test: Determine the length of the maximum possible timestamp value echo -n "$(date +%s%3N999)" | wc -cLength of output: 55
src/storage/src/redis.h (1)
155-155: Verify that all call sites are updated to reflect new method signaturesThe methods
Decrby,HIncrby,HIncrbyfloat,SAdd, andZIncrbyhave updated signatures with additional parameters. Ensure that all call sites of these methods have been updated accordingly to prevent compilation errors or unexpected behavior.Run the following script to identify potential call sites that may need updating:
Also applies to: 202-203, 250-250, 292-293
src/pika_zset.cc (2)
225-228: Handle potential division by zero when calculatingtime_stamp.In
ZIncrbyCmd::ToRedisProtocol(), the calculationts_ms_ / 1000assumes thatts_ms_is not zero. Ifts_ms_is zero, this could lead to unexpected behavior.Please verify that
ts_ms_cannot be zero at this point. If it can be zero, consider adding a check to handle this case appropriately.
1505-1524:⚠️ Potential issueUpdate variable usage in
ToRedisProtocol()to reflect renamed variablemembers_removed_.After renaming
members_remed_tomembers_removed_, ensure that theToRedisProtocol()method inZRemrangebyrankCmdalso uses the updated variable name to prevent compilation errors.Apply this diff to update the variable usage:
std::string ZRemrangebyrankCmd::ToRedisProtocol() { std::string content; content.reserve(RAW_ARGS_LEN); - RedisAppendLen(content, 2 + members_remed_.size(), "*"); + RedisAppendLen(content, 2 + members_removed_.size(), "*"); // to zrem cmd std::string zrem_cmd(kCmdNameZRem); RedisAppendLenUint64(content, zrem_cmd.size(), "$"); RedisAppendContent(content, zrem_cmd); // key RedisAppendLenUint64(content, key_.size(), "$"); RedisAppendContent(content, key_); // member - for (auto& m : members_remed_) { + for (auto& m : members_removed_) { RedisAppendLenUint64(content, m.size(), "$"); RedisAppendContent(content, m); } return content; }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/pika_kv.cc (1)
491-492: Verify Handling of Negative or Zero TimestampsIn the calculation of
time_stamp, whents_ms_is less than or equal to zero, you're usingts_ms_directly. This might result in negative timestamps in the Redis protocol command, which could cause issues.Run the following script to check for other usages of
ts_ms_and ensure negative timestamps are handled correctly:Verification successful
Negative
ts_ms_Values Properly HandledThe analysis confirms that
ts_ms_is never assigned negative values and is appropriately handled in all relevant code sections. Negative timestamps in Redis protocol commands are effectively prevented.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usages of `ts_ms_` and verify handling of negative values. rg --type cpp --context 3 'ts_ms_' src/Length of output: 8377
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for assignments to `ts_ms_` to verify if negative values are possible. rg --type cpp 'ts_ms_ *= *-?[0-9]+' src/Length of output: 117
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for arithmetic operations and conditionals involving `ts_ms_` to verify handling of negative values. rg --type cpp '[-+*/] *ts_ms_' src/ || rg --type cpp 'ts_ms_ *[<|>]=?' src/Length of output: 664
src/pika_cache.cc (1)
1682-1684:⚠️ Potential issueAvoid direct comparison of floating-point numbers using
==Similarly, comparing
cmd->Score()withcache_min_scoreusing==may result in incorrect behavior due to floating-point precision limitations. Consider using a tolerance for the comparison.Apply this diff to address the issue:
- } else if (cmd->Score() == cache_min_score) { + } else if (std::abs(cmd->Score() - cache_min_score) < std::numeric_limits<double>::epsilon()) {Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/storage/src/redis_zsets.cc (3)
817-818: Method signature change inZRemrangebyrankThe
ZRemrangebyrankmethod now includes an additional parameterstd::vector<std::string>* members_deled. Ensure that all calls to this method are updated to include the new parameter to maintain consistency and prevent compilation errors.Run the following script to find calls to
ZRemrangebyrankwithout the new parameter:#!/bin/bash # Description: Find calls to Redis::ZRemrangebyrank missing the new parameter. # Expected result: No output means all calls are updated. rg --type cpp 'ZRemrangebyrank\(' | while read -r line; do args_count=$(echo "$line" | grep -o ',' | wc -l) if [ "$args_count" -lt 4 ]; then echo "Potential outdated usage: $line" fi done
889-889: Method signature change inZRemrangebyscoreThe
ZRemrangebyscoremethod now includes the additional parameterstd::vector<std::string>* member_del. Verify that all calls to this method are updated to include this parameter to prevent any discrepancies.Run the following script to find calls to
ZRemrangebyscoremissing the new parameter:#!/bin/bash # Description: Find calls to Redis::ZRemrangebyscore missing the new parameter. # Expected result: No output indicates all calls have been updated. rg --type cpp 'ZRemrangebyscore\(' | while read -r line; do args_count=$(echo "$line" | grep -o ',' | wc -l) if [ "$args_count" -lt 6 ]; then echo "Potential outdated usage: $line" fi done
1598-1599: Method signature change inZRemrangebylexThe method
ZRemrangebylexnow includesstd::vector<std::string>* member_delas an additional parameter. Please update all calls to this method to include the new parameter to maintain consistency.Run the following script to find calls to
ZRemrangebylexwithout the new parameter:#!/bin/bash # Description: Find calls to Redis::ZRemrangebylex missing the new parameter. # Expected result: No output means all calls are updated. rg --type cpp 'ZRemrangebylex\(' | while read -r line; do args_count=$(echo "$line" | grep -o ',' | wc -l) if [ "$args_count" -lt 6 ]; then echo "Potential outdated usage: $line" fi done
| @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ func issuePushPopFrequency(ctx *context.Context, clientMaster *redis.Client, wg | |||
| clientMaster.BLPop(*ctx, 1*time.Second, "blist0") | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| var _ = Describe("should replication ", func() { | |||
| var _ = PDescribe("should replication ", func() { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider the implications of using PDescribe
The change from Describe to PDescribe alters how this test suite is executed. PDescribe typically marks a test as pending or focused, which means:
- It may be skipped during normal test runs, potentially leaving important scenarios untested.
- If it's a focused test, it might cause other tests to be skipped, which could hide issues in other parts of the system.
Consider whether this change is intentional. If it's meant to temporarily focus on this test suite or mark it as pending for future implementation, ensure there's a plan to revert this change once the work is complete. If it's not intentional, change it back to Describe.
| uint64_t ts_ms; | ||
| s = db->storage()->SAdd(tag_key, members, &res, nullptr); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unused variable declaration.
Another uint64_t ts_ms; variable is declared here but not used in the subsequent code. This is similar to the previous instance and may indicate an incomplete implementation or a leftover from a previous change.
Consider removing this unused variable or implementing its intended functionality:
- uint64_t ts_ms;If this variable is intended for future use or part of an ongoing implementation, please add a TODO comment explaining its purpose.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| uint64_t ts_ms; | |
| s = db->storage()->SAdd(tag_key, members, &res, nullptr); | |
| s = db->storage()->SAdd(tag_key, members, &res, nullptr); |
| uint64_t ts_ms; | ||
| s = db->storage()->SAdd(slot_key, members, &res, nullptr); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unused variable declaration.
A uint64_t ts_ms; variable is declared here but not used in the subsequent code. This may indicate an incomplete implementation or a leftover from a previous change.
Consider removing this unused variable or implementing its intended functionality:
- uint64_t ts_ms;If this variable is intended for future use or part of an ongoing implementation, please add a TODO comment explaining its purpose.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| uint64_t ts_ms; | |
| s = db->storage()->SAdd(slot_key, members, &res, nullptr); | |
| s = db->storage()->SAdd(slot_key, members, &res, nullptr); |
| Status Storage::HyperloglogSet(const Slice& key, std::string& value) { | ||
| auto& inst = GetDBInstance(key); | ||
| return inst->HyperloglogGet(key, &value); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Incorrect function call in HyperloglogSet
The HyperloglogSet method is calling HyperloglogGet instead of HyperloglogSet. This seems to be a mistake and may cause the function not to perform as intended.
Apply this diff to fix the function call:
- return inst->HyperloglogGet(key, &value);
+ return inst->HyperloglogSet(key, value);Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Status Storage::HyperloglogSet(const Slice& key, std::string& value) { | |
| auto& inst = GetDBInstance(key); | |
| return inst->HyperloglogGet(key, &value); | |
| } | |
| Status Storage::HyperloglogSet(const Slice& key, std::string& value) { | |
| auto& inst = GetDBInstance(key); | |
| return inst->HyperloglogSet(key, value); | |
| } |
| Status Storage::ZRemrangebylex(const Slice& key, const Slice& min, const Slice& max, bool left_close, bool right_close, | ||
| int32_t* ret, std::vector<std::string>* members_del) { | ||
| auto& inst = GetDBInstance(key); | ||
| return inst->ZRemrangebylex(key, min, max, left_close, right_close, ret); | ||
| std::vector<std::string> tmp_m_del; | ||
| return inst->ZRemrangebylex(key, min, max, left_close, right_close, ret, nullptr); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mismatch in members_del parameter usage
In ZRemrangebylex, the members_del parameter is received but nullptr is passed to inst->ZRemrangebylex instead of members_del. If the intention is to collect deleted members, you should pass members_del to the function.
Apply this diff to correct the parameter:
- return inst->ZRemrangebylex(key, min, max, left_close, right_close, ret, nullptr);
+ return inst->ZRemrangebylex(key, min, max, left_close, right_close, ret, members_del);Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Status Storage::ZRemrangebylex(const Slice& key, const Slice& min, const Slice& max, bool left_close, bool right_close, | |
| int32_t* ret, std::vector<std::string>* members_del) { | |
| auto& inst = GetDBInstance(key); | |
| return inst->ZRemrangebylex(key, min, max, left_close, right_close, ret); | |
| std::vector<std::string> tmp_m_del; | |
| return inst->ZRemrangebylex(key, min, max, left_close, right_close, ret, nullptr); | |
| Status Storage::ZRemrangebylex(const Slice& key, const Slice& min, const Slice& max, bool left_close, bool right_close, | |
| int32_t* ret, std::vector<std::string>* members_del) { | |
| auto& inst = GetDBInstance(key); | |
| std::vector<std::string> tmp_m_del; | |
| return inst->ZRemrangebylex(key, min, max, left_close, right_close, ret, members_del); |
| key_found = true; | ||
| version = parsed_zsets_meta_value.Version(); | ||
| } | ||
| ts_ms_ = parsed_zsets_meta_value.Etime(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure correct assignment of key_found and ts_ms_
After confirming the key is found, the code sets key_found = true; and retrieves the expiration time with ts_ms_ = parsed_zsets_meta_value.Etime();. Make sure that parsed_zsets_meta_value is valid and properly initialized before accessing these properties to avoid potential null references or undefined behavior.
| Status Redis::PKZSetAt(const Slice& key, const Slice& member, double old_score, double incr_value) { | ||
| uint32_t statistic = 0; | ||
| double score = old_score + incr_value; | ||
| char score_buf[8]; | ||
| uint64_t version = 0; | ||
| std::string meta_value; | ||
| rocksdb::WriteBatch batch; | ||
| ScopeRecordLock l(lock_mgr_, key); | ||
|
|
||
| BaseMetaKey base_meta_key(key); | ||
| Status s = db_->Get(default_read_options_, handles_[kMetaCF], base_meta_key.Encode(), &meta_value); | ||
| if (s.ok() && !ExpectedMetaValue(DataType::kZSets, meta_value)) { | ||
| if (ExpectedStale(meta_value)) { | ||
| s = Status::NotFound(); | ||
| } else { | ||
| return Status::InvalidArgument( | ||
| "WRONGTYPE, key: " + key.ToString() + ", expected type: " + | ||
| DataTypeStrings[static_cast<int>(DataType::kZSets)] + ", got type: " + | ||
| DataTypeStrings[static_cast<int>(GetMetaValueType(meta_value))]); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| if (s.ok()) { | ||
| ParsedZSetsMetaValue parsed_zsets_meta_value(&meta_value); | ||
| if (parsed_zsets_meta_value.IsStale() || parsed_zsets_meta_value.Count() == 0) { | ||
| version = parsed_zsets_meta_value.InitialMetaValue(); | ||
| } else { | ||
| version = parsed_zsets_meta_value.Version(); | ||
| } | ||
| std::string data_value; | ||
|
|
||
| ZSetsScoreKey zsets_score_key(key, version, old_score, member); | ||
| batch.Delete(handles_[kZsetsScoreCF], zsets_score_key.Encode()); | ||
|
|
||
| ZSetsMemberKey zsets_member_key(key, version, member); | ||
| const void* ptr_score = reinterpret_cast<const void*>(&score); | ||
| EncodeFixed64(score_buf, *reinterpret_cast<const uint64_t*>(ptr_score)); | ||
| BaseDataValue zsets_member_i_val(Slice(score_buf, sizeof(uint64_t))); | ||
| batch.Put(handles_[kZsetsDataCF], zsets_member_key.Encode(), zsets_member_i_val.Encode()); | ||
|
|
||
| ZSetsScoreKey zsets_score_key2(key, version, score, member); | ||
| BaseDataValue zsets_score_i_val(Slice{}); | ||
| batch.Put(handles_[kZsetsScoreCF], zsets_score_key2.Encode(), zsets_score_i_val.Encode()); | ||
| // *ret = score; | ||
| s = db_->Write(default_write_options_, &batch); | ||
| UpdateSpecificKeyStatistics(DataType::kZSets, key.ToString(), statistic); | ||
| return s; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unused variable statistic in PKZSetAt
In the PKZSetAt method, the variable statistic is initialized but not modified before being passed to UpdateSpecificKeyStatistics. This may lead to inaccurate key statistics.
Consider incrementing statistic appropriately to reflect the actual operation performed. For example, increment statistic after modifying the zset:
...
+ statistic++;
...
UpdateSpecificKeyStatistics(DataType::kZSets, key.ToString(), statistic);Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| Status Redis::ZIncrby(const Slice& key, const Slice& member, double increment, double* ret, uint64_t& ts_ms_, | ||
| bool& key_found) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Potential Outdated Usages of ZIncrby Detected
The following instances of ZIncrby do not match the updated method signature and require attention:
include/pika_cache.h: rocksdb::Status ZIncrby(std::string& key, std::string& member, double increment);src/pika_cache.cc:Status PikaCache::ZIncrby(std::string& key, std::string& member, double increment) {src/pika_cache.cc: return caches_[cache_index]->ZIncrby(key, member, increment);src/cache/src/zset.cc:Status RedisCache::ZIncrby(std::string& key, std::string& member, double increment) {src/cache/src/zset.cc: int ret = RcZIncrby(cache_, kobj, items, 2);src/cache/include/cache.h: Status ZIncrby(std::string& key, std::string& member, double increment);
Please update these calls to include the new parameters uint64_t& ts_ms_ and bool& key_found to ensure compatibility with the updated method signature.
Analysis chain
Update method signature of ZIncrby affects existing calls
The addition of uint64_t& ts_ms_ and bool& key_found changes the signature of the ZIncrby method. Please ensure that all calls to ZIncrby across the codebase are updated to match the new signature to prevent potential compilation errors or unexpected behavior.
Run the following script to find any usages of ZIncrby that have not been updated:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find calls to Redis::ZIncrby that do not match the new signature.
# Expected result: No output indicates all calls have been updated.
rg --type cpp 'ZIncrby\(' | while read -r line; do
args_count=$(echo "$line" | grep -o ',' | wc -l)
if [ "$args_count" -lt 5 ]; then
echo "Potential outdated usage: $line"
fi
done
Length of output: 11089
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find calls to Redis::ZIncrby that do not match the new signature.
# Expected result: No output indicates all calls have been updated.
rg --type cpp 'ZIncrby\(' | while read -r line; do
# Extract the part after the opening parenthesis
args=$(echo "$line" | grep -o 'ZIncrby([^)]*)' | sed 's/ZIncrby(//' | sed 's/)//')
# Count the number of commas to determine the number of arguments
args_count=$(echo "$args" | grep -o ',' | wc -l)
# Since the signature now has 6 parameters, there should be 5 commas
if [ "$args_count" -lt 5 ]; then
echo "Potential outdated usage: $line"
fi
done
Length of output: 12970
Refactor pika binlog to achieve idempotency and master-slave consistency