Skip to content

Conversation

@ijpulidos
Copy link
Contributor

Initial preliminary support for protein mutation setup on feflow

Checklist

  • Added a news entry

Developers certificate of origin

@ijpulidos ijpulidos changed the title Protein mutation support Utility function changes for protein mutations Jan 30, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 11, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 87.09677% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 92.68%. Comparing base (3da2ae9) to head (3916cd3).
Report is 48 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
openfe/protocols/openmm_utils/system_creation.py 86.20% 4 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1106      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.52%   92.68%   -0.85%     
==========================================
  Files         142      141       -1     
  Lines       10628    10795     +167     
==========================================
+ Hits         9940    10005      +65     
- Misses        688      790     +102     
Flag Coverage Δ
fast-tests 92.68% <87.09%> (?)
slow-tests ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

solvent_comps = list(set(solvent_comps)) # if given iterable
except TypeError:
solvent_comps = [solvent_comps] # if not iterable, given single obj
# TODO: Support multiple solvent components? Is there a use case for it?
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably not - it doesn't really mean much in the current SolventCOmponent structure.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I agree with that. But I guess it doesn't hurt to have the TODO there? Unless you find it annoying, we can remove it.

@github-actions
Copy link

No API break detected ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants