Conversation
|
Hello @PaulaSp3! Thanks for updating this PR.
Comment last updated at 2025-01-16 09:53:57 UTC |
13c09b5 to
f1e10e8
Compare
d0e3547 to
6b2961d
Compare
889ce5f to
10cbb9d
Compare
2606990 to
ac54923
Compare
ahuber-bfw
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks ok from my side now!
- apart from the flux-conservation the PR does not introduce any major changes to the code, but adds some useful improvements (documentation, docStrings, etc.)
- @PaulaSp3: maybe you can run some tests if the
checkInputParameterValuesfunction behaves as expected - I only checked/tested this function with the global parameters (which works) - but not with the variable input rasters!
b01858a to
1eb75da
Compare
1eb75da to
9f0904c
Compare
…flux - add docstrings com4
- check input parameters for sensible values - changes to checkInputParameterValues() and one-line in flowCore.py
|
Standardtests ok, apart from Kot, Hof |
|
Code Climate has analyzed commit 1606e1a and detected 0 issues on this pull request. The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 2.1% (50% is the threshold). This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 69.2% (-0.2% change). View more on Code Climate. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.