Community changes #144
Community changes #144
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications across three service implementation classes: Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/service/beneficiary/IdentityBeneficiaryServiceImpl.java (5)
Line range hint
33-38: Standardize JSON parsing approach across the classThe code uses both
JsonParser(which is deprecated in newer versions) and direct Gson parsing. Consider standardizing on using Gson's type adapters for consistent JSON handling.-JsonParser parser = new JsonParser(); -JsonObject responseObj = (JsonObject) parser.parse(result); +Gson gson = new Gson(); +JsonObject responseObj = gson.fromJson(result, JsonObject.class);
Line range hint
249-256: Implement consistent error handling across all methodsThe error handling is inconsistent. Some methods check for null responses while others don't. For example,
getBeneficiaryListByPhonelacks the null check that exists ingetBeneficiaryListByIDs.Apply this pattern consistently across all methods:
String result = httpUtils.post(...); +if (result == null) { + throw new IEMRException("Failed to get response from identity service"); +} OutputResponse identityResponse = InputMapper.gson().fromJson(result, OutputResponse.class); if (identityResponse.getStatusCode() == OutputResponse.USERID_FAILURE) { throw new IEMRException(identityResponse.getErrorMessage()); }Also applies to: 392-399
Line range hint
52-56: Consider using dependency injection for HttpUtilsUsing static instances makes the code harder to test and maintain. Consider injecting HttpUtils and ConfigProperties as dependencies.
-private static HttpUtils httpUtils = new HttpUtils(); -private String identityBaseURL = ConfigProperties.getPropertyByName("identity-api-url"); +@Autowired +private HttpUtils httpUtils; +@Value("${identity.api.url}") +private String identityBaseURL;
Line range hint
601-629: Add input validation and documentation for generateBeneficiaryIDsThe new method lacks input validation and documentation. Consider adding:
- Parameter validation for the request string
- Javadoc explaining the method's purpose, parameters, and return value
- Validation of the response array before processing
+/** + * Generates unique beneficiary IDs based on the provided request. + * + * @param request JSON string containing the generation request parameters + * @param auth Authorization token + * @return List of generated beneficiary models + * @throws IEMRException if the request is invalid or generation fails + */ public List<BeneficiaryGenModel> generateBeneficiaryIDs(String request, String auth) throws IEMRException { + if (request == null || request.trim().isEmpty()) { + throw new IEMRException("Request cannot be null or empty"); + } String result; JsonParser parser = new JsonParser();
Line range hint
49-50: Implement secure logging practicesThe class handles sensitive beneficiary data but uses default logging. Consider:
- Using masked logging for sensitive data
- Adding debug logging for troubleshooting
- Implementing request/response correlation IDs
-Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(this.getClass().getName()); +private static final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(IdentityBeneficiaryServiceImpl.class); + +private String maskSensitiveData(String data) { + // Implementation to mask PII data + return data.replaceAll("(?<=\\w{4})\\w(?=\\w{4})", "*"); +}src/main/java/com/iemr/common/service/sms/SMSServiceImpl.java (2)
Line range hint
805-883: Improve error handling and method organization.The method is quite long and handles multiple responsibilities. Consider the following improvements:
- Extract the SMS sending logic into a separate private method
- Use try-with-resources for RestTemplate
- Add more specific exception handling
- Consider using a configuration class for SMS credentials
Here's a suggested refactor:
@Async @Override public void publishSMS() { - RestTemplate restTemplateLogin = new RestTemplate(); + try (RestTemplate restTemplateLogin = new RestTemplate()) { + if (!attemptPublishSMS(restTemplateLogin)) { + logger.warn("SMS publishing already in progress"); + return; + } + } catch (SMSPublishingException e) { + logger.error("SMS publishing failed with error: {}", e.getMessage(), e); + } catch (Exception e) { + logger.error("Unexpected error during SMS publishing: {}", e.getMessage(), e); + } finally { + SMSServiceImpl.publishingSMS.set(false); + } } +private boolean attemptPublishSMS(RestTemplate restTemplate) throws SMSPublishingException { + if (!SMSServiceImpl.publishingSMS.compareAndSet(false, true)) { + return false; + } + + List<SMSNotification> pendingSMS = getPendingSMSNotifications(); + for (SMSNotification sms : pendingSMS) { + try { + sendSingleSMS(restTemplate, sms); + } catch (Exception e) { + handleSMSError(sms, e); + } + } + return true; }
Line range hint
806-811: Consider using a secure configuration management system.Sensitive credentials and configuration values are being retrieved directly from ConfigProperties. Consider:
- Using a secure vault service for credential management
- Encrypting sensitive values
- Using environment variables for different deployment environments
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/service/beneficiary/RegisterBenificiaryServiceImpl.java (3)
Line range hint
52-55: Empty implementation in save method returns dummy object.The
savemethod logs the input and returns an emptyBeneficiaryobject. This could lead to data inconsistency issues.Please implement the actual save logic or remove this method if it's no longer needed.
Line range hint
246-248: Empty catch block suppresses exceptions.The empty catch block in
updateMCTSRecordsilently swallows exceptions, making it difficult to debug issues.Add proper exception handling:
} catch (Exception e) { - + logger.error("Failed to update MCTS record", e); }
Line range hint
57-64: Review transaction management in async methods.The
@Asyncannotation on methods likeupdateBeneficiaryIDcould lead to transaction management issues if not properly configured.Consider:
- Adding transaction boundaries using
@Transactional- Implementing proper error handling and retry mechanisms
- Using CompletableFuture for better async operation handling
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/service/beneficiary/IdentityBeneficiaryServiceImpl.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/common/service/beneficiary/RegisterBenificiaryServiceImpl.java(2 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/common/service/sms/SMSServiceImpl.java(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/service/sms/SMSServiceImpl.java (1)
Line range hint 889-894: LGTM!
The new method is well-structured with proper error handling and mapping.
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/service/beneficiary/RegisterBenificiaryServiceImpl.java (1)
148-150:
Inconsistent community field usage between update and save methods.
The save method only sets the community field while the updateBenificiary method sets both community and communityName. This inconsistency could lead to data synchronization issues.
Let's verify the usage of these fields in the identity service:
Please align the field usage between both methods based on the identity service requirements.
| RestTemplate restTemplateLogin = new RestTemplate(); | ||
| if (!SMSServiceImpl.publishingSMS) { | ||
| try { | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix potential race condition with static flag.
The static publishingSMS boolean flag is not thread-safe, which could lead to race conditions when multiple threads execute this @async method simultaneously.
Consider using an AtomicBoolean instead:
-private static Boolean publishingSMS = false;
+private static final AtomicBoolean publishingSMS = new AtomicBoolean(false);Then update the flag checks:
-if (!SMSServiceImpl.publishingSMS) {
- SMSServiceImpl.publishingSMS = true;
+if (SMSServiceImpl.publishingSMS.compareAndSet(false, true)) {Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's an existing code. maintaining from long back
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
| if(null != benificiaryDetails.getI_bendemographics()) { | ||
| identityEditDTO.setCommunity(benificiaryDetails.getI_bendemographics().getCommunityName()); | ||
| identityEditDTO.setCommunityName(benificiaryDetails.getI_bendemographics().getCommunityName()); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Redundant community field assignments.
The code sets both community and communityName fields with the same value. This appears redundant and could lead to maintenance issues.
Consider using only one of these fields consistently:
if(null != benificiaryDetails.getI_bendemographics()) {
- identityEditDTO.setCommunity(benificiaryDetails.getI_bendemographics().getCommunityName());
- identityEditDTO.setCommunityName(benificiaryDetails.getI_bendemographics().getCommunityName());
+ identityEditDTO.setCommunityName(benificiaryDetails.getI_bendemographics().getCommunityName());
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
2 participants
📋 Description
JIRA ID:
Please provide a summary of the change and the motivation behind it. Include relevant context and details.
✅ Type of Change
ℹ️ Additional Information
Please describe how the changes were tested, and include any relevant screenshots, logs, or other information that provides additional context.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Enhancements
Bug Fixes