refactored CSS files in src/screens/Users #2600
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes primarily involve the refactoring of CSS styles related to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
|
@antriksh-9 Please fix the failing tests. |
I ran |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)
577-602: Remove commented-out code.The media query implementation looks good, but there's an unnecessary commented-out margin-right property that should be removed.
.btnsContainer .btnsBlock { display: block; margin-top: 1rem; - /* margin-right: 0; */ }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/screens/Users/Users.module.css(0 hunks)src/screens/Users/Users.tsx(1 hunks)src/style/app.module.css(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/screens/Users/Users.module.css
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/style/app.module.css (3)
92-103: LGTM! Well-structured input container styles.
The refactored styles for .btnsContainer and its child elements provide better organization and clear visual hierarchy.
109-112: LGTM! Clean and purposeful utility class.
The .listBox class provides essential layout properties for the list container.
114-120: LGTM! Well-implemented centering styles.
The .notFound class effectively uses flexbox properties to center content both vertically and horizontally.
src/screens/Users/Users.tsx (1)
19-19: LGTM! Consistent with CSS refactoring objective.
The style import has been correctly updated to use the consolidated styles from app.module.css.
|
Please fix the failing tests |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/style/app.module.css (2)
92-103: LGTM! Consider adding focus styles for accessibility.The button container styles are well-structured with proper flex layout and input field styling.
Consider adding focus styles for better accessibility:
.btnsContainer input { outline: 1px solid var(--bs-gray-400); + &:focus { + outline: 2px solid var(--bs-primary); + outline-offset: 1px; + } }
Line range hint
1-601: Consider organizing CSS modules by feature.While consolidating styles into app.module.css works, consider organizing CSS modules by feature/component for better maintainability. This could help prevent duplication and make the codebase more modular.
Suggested structure:
src/ styles/ components/ buttons.module.css inputs.module.css lists.module.css layouts/ containers.module.css app.module.css (for truly global styles)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)
92-103: Consider using relative units for input widthThe fixed percentage width might not be optimal for all viewport sizes. Consider using
clamp()ormin/max-widthfor better responsiveness..btnsContainer .input { - width: 70%; + width: clamp(250px, 70%, 800px); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/screens/Users/Users.tsx(2 hunks)src/style/app.module.css(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/screens/Users/Users.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/style/app.module.css (4)
109-112: Remove duplicate .listBox class declaration.
This class is duplicated in the file.
114-120: Remove duplicate .notFound class and enhance semantics.
This class is duplicated in the file.
564-577: LGTM! Good responsive layout adjustments
The changes improve the mobile layout by:
- Stacking buttons vertically
- Adjusting margins for better spacing
- Making buttons full-width for better touch targets
578-580: Replace title attribute selector with a dedicated class.
Using the title attribute for styling is brittle as it couples the styling to UI text.
|
Please fix the conflicting file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/screens/Users/Users.tsx (2)
414-422: Maintain consistency in semantic HTML elementsWhile the addition of ARIA roles and labels improves accessibility, consider using
sectionconsistently instead of mixingsectionanddivfor similar content blocks.- <div - className={styles.notFound} - role="alert" - aria-label="No results found" - > + <section + className={styles.notFound} + role="alert" + aria-label="No results found" + > <h4>{t('noUserFound')}</h4> - </div> + </section>Also applies to: 426-432
224-224: Consider moving complex types to interfacesThe inline type definition could be moved to a separate interface for better reusability and maintainability.
interface FetchMoreResult { fetchMoreResult?: { users: InterfaceQueryUserListItem[] }; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/Users/Users.tsx(5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/screens/Users/Users.tsx (4)
94-103: Great improvement in type safety!
Replacing any types with explicit type definitions for Apollo Client's methods improves code reliability and IDE support.
182-186: Good type safety improvement for event handling
The explicit typing of the keyboard event and proper type casting of the event target improves code reliability.
233-233: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add null check for spread operator
The spread operator usage could throw an error if prev is undefined. Consider adding a null coalescing operator.
- users: [...(prev?.users || []), ...fetchMoreResult.users],
+ users: [...(prev?.users ?? []), ...fetchMoreResult.users],Likely invalid or redundant comment.
19-19: Verify style isolation after CSS module consolidation
Moving styles from a component-specific module to the global app.module.css could lead to style conflicts if the same class names are used across different components.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that the CSS classes btnsContainer, inputContainer, input, notFound, and listBox are used across multiple components in the codebase, including the Users.tsx file. The app.module.css file contains the global styles for these classes, and they are being used consistently throughout the application.
No style conflicts after CSS module consolidation
The CSS classes used in Users.tsx are properly defined in the global app.module.css with appropriate scoping and styling. The classes are used consistently across components with proper namespacing through CSS modules, which prevents style conflicts.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for potential class name conflicts in other components
rg -l "className=\{styles\.(btnsContainer|inputContainer|input|notFound|listBox)\}" --type tsx
Length of output: 124
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for potential class name conflicts in other components using ripgrep
# First, let's find all TypeScript/React files
fd "\.(tsx|ts|jsx|js)$" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg "className=\{styles\.(btnsContainer|inputContainer|input|notFound|listBox)\}" "$file" || true
done
# Also check the global CSS module for these class definitions
echo "=== Checking app.module.css ==="
fd "app.module.css$" | xargs cat
Length of output: 110738
|
@palisadoes I have fixed failing tests and conflicting file. |
palisadoes
merged commit debe672
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
refactored CSS files in src/screens/Users
Issue Number:
Fixes #2528
Did you add tests for your changes?
No
Snapshots/Videos:
Tests:
After changes:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Not Relevant
Summary
The goal is to convert the CSS file in this subdirectory and all the components related to this screen to use this new design pattern.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
.listBoxand.notFoundclasses.Bug Fixes
Style