Migrated the CSS from OrganizationEvents to the global CSS file app.m… #2948
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request involves refactoring the CSS styling for the OrganizationEvents screen by removing the local CSS module and updating the import to use a global stylesheet. The changes align with an ongoing effort to consolidate CSS styles across the application, moving from component-specific styling to a centralized approach in the Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)
3033-3037: Use CSS variables for consistent theming.The hardcoded green color in
.cardAddOnEntryshould use CSS variables for better maintainability and consistent theming.Consider using the existing color variables:
.cardAddOnEntry { - border: 4px solid green; + border: 4px solid var(--bs-primary); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/screens/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEvents.module.css(0 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEvents.tsx(1 hunks)src/style/app.module.css(3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/screens/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEvents.module.css
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/screens/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEvents.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)
3047-3065: LGTM! Well-structured utility classes.
The new utility classes for checkboxes and flex layouts are well-organized, follow consistent naming conventions, and provide reusable styling options across components.
| @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| .justifysp { | |||
| display: flex; | |||
| display: block; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Keep the display property as flex in .justifysp
The verification shows that changing .justifysp from flex to block would cause inconsistencies and potential layout issues because:
- The class is used in multiple components (OrganizationEvents, OrgContribution, AddOnStore, Advertisements)
- Other CSS modules consistently use
display: flexordisplay: gridfor this class - The media query in the same file (app.module.css) still uses
display: flex - There's already a specific class
.justifyspMemberDetailfor specialized layout needs
Suggested fix:
.justifysp {
- display: block;
+ display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
}If a block display is needed for a specific case, create a new specialized class instead of modifying this widely-used utility class.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the impact of changing display property.
The change from flex to block display in .justifysp class could break the layout of existing components that rely on flex behavior. Additionally, this creates an inconsistency with the media query below that still uses display: flex.
Consider keeping the flex display and using an additional class for block display if needed:
.justifysp {
- display: block;
+ display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
}
+.justifysp-block {
+ display: block;
+}🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for components using the justifysp class
rg -l "justifysp" --type tsx
Length of output: 56
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for components using the justifysp class with ripgrep
# Using broader file type patterns to catch all possible JavaScript/TypeScript files
rg -l "justifysp" -t js -t jsx -t ts -t tsx
# Also search in CSS files to see if this class is used in other stylesheets
rg -l "justifysp" -t css
Length of output: 346
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual usage of justifysp in these CSS files and their context
rg "justifysp" -A 2 -B 2 src/style/app.module.css src/components/Advertisements/Advertisements.module.css src/components/AddOn/core/AddOnStore/AddOnStore.module.css src/screens/OrganizationVenues/OrganizationVenues.module.css src/screens/MemberDetail/MemberDetail.module.css
# Also search for any JavaScript/TypeScript files using a more basic approach
rg -l "justifysp" --type js
rg -l "justifysp" --type ts
Length of output: 4308
…odule.css
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
feature
Issue Number:
Fixes ##2514
Did you add tests for your changes?
yes
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
no need to update documentation
Summary
The maximum CSS is already present in the app.module.css. While there are some changes that can be made from the original file to app.module.css, these do not create any significant impact on the page.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
no just migration of css from subdirectory to glocbal css file app.module.css
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
New Features
.cardAddOnEntryand.checkboxdiv.Style
.justifyspand enhancements to.entryaction.