-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 802
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added Code Rabbit Approval Check to pull-request.yml Workflow #3008
Added Code Rabbit Approval Check to pull-request.yml Workflow #3008
Conversation
WalkthroughA new GitHub Actions workflow job Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh[warning] 1-1: 🔇 Additional comments (4).github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh (4)
The script requires GITHUB_TOKEN, PR_NUMBER, and GITHUB_REPOSITORY environment variables but doesn't validate their presence. 🧰 Tools🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch[warning] 1-1:
The JSON processing segment includes comprehensive error handling for jq operations and validates the response data appropriately.
Apply this diff to improve the numeric validation: -if [[ "$approval_state" =~ ^[0-9]+$ ]] && [[ $approval_state -gt 0 ]]; then
+# Ensure approval_state is a valid non-negative integer
+if [[ "$approval_state" =~ ^[0-9]+$ ]] && [ "$approval_state" -ge 0 ]; then
+ if [ "$approval_state" -gt 0 ]; then
echo "Success: PR approved by CodeRabbit.ai."
+ else
+ echo "Error: PR is not approved by CodeRabbit.ai (no approvals found)."
+ exit 1
+ fi
else
- echo "Error: PR is not approved by CodeRabbit.ai."
+ echo "Error: Invalid approval state returned from API."
exit 1
fi
Please ensure this script is properly integrated with the workflow:
Run this script to verify the integration: ✅ Verification successfulLet me gather more information about the workflow integration. Script is properly integrated with GitHub Actions workflow The validation script is correctly integrated with the workflow:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify script integration with GitHub Actions workflow
# Check if script is referenced in workflow files
echo "Checking workflow files for script reference..."
rg -l "validate-coderabbit.sh" .github/workflows/
# Verify script permissions
echo "Checking script permissions..."
ls -l .github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh
# Check environment variables in workflow
echo "Checking environment variables in workflow..."
rg "env:" .github/workflows/ -A 5
Length of output: 5816 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check the workflow file that references the script
echo "Checking pull-request.yml workflow content..."
cat .github/workflows/pull-request.yml
# Check if script is called with proper permissions
echo "Checking if script has execute permission set in workflow..."
rg "chmod.*validate-coderabbit.sh" .github/workflows/
Length of output: 17047 🧰 Tools🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch[warning] 1-1: Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (1)
485-485
: Add newline at end of fileAdd a newline character at the end of the file to comply with POSIX standards.
env: GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} +
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 485-485: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
[error] 485-485: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (2)
466-468
: LGTM: Job definition and dependencies are well structured
The job is appropriately placed at the end of the workflow and depends on all necessary quality checks.
466-485
: Verify workflow protection settings
Since this is a security-critical check, ensure that:
- Branch protection rules require this check to pass
- The workflow cannot be modified without proper review
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 485-485: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (2)
473-474
: Consider using a more restricted token permissionWhile using
GITHUB_TOKEN
is correct, it's recommended to explicitly specify the minimum required permissions for security best practices.Add permissions at the job level:
CodeRabbit-Approval: name: Validate CodeRabbit.ai Approval needs: [Code-Quality-Checks, Docker-Start-Check, Start-App-Without-Docker, Test-Application] runs-on: ubuntu-latest + permissions: + pull-requests: read steps:Also applies to: 497-498
498-498
: Add newline at end of fileAdd a newline character at the end of the file to comply with POSIX standards.
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} +
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 498-498: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
472-472: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC1046:error:7:1: Couldn't find 'fi' for this 'if'
(shellcheck)
472-472: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC1073:error:7:1: Couldn't parse this if expression. Fix to allow more checks
(shellcheck)
472-472: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC1047:error:10:1: Expected 'fi' matching previously mentioned 'if'
(shellcheck)
472-472: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC1072:error:10:2: Unexpected keyword/token. Fix any mentioned problems and try again
(shellcheck)
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
[error] 498-498: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (2)
466-470
: LGTM! Well-structured job definition
The job is properly configured to run after all essential quality checks, which is an efficient approach.
471-496
: LGTM! Robust error handling implementation
The script successfully implements comprehensive error handling as suggested in the previous review:
- API call failure handling
- JSON response validation
- Approval count parsing validation
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
472-472: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC1046:error:7:1: Couldn't find 'fi' for this 'if'
(shellcheck)
472-472: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC1073:error:7:1: Couldn't parse this if expression. Fix to allow more checks
(shellcheck)
472-472: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC1047:error:10:1: Expected 'fi' matching previously mentioned 'if'
(shellcheck)
472-472: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC1072:error:10:2: Unexpected keyword/token. Fix any mentioned problems and try again
(shellcheck)
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3008 +/- ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage 26.46% 89.25% +62.78%
=====================================================
Files 300 322 +22
Lines 7568 8422 +854
Branches 1652 1898 +246
=====================================================
+ Hits 2003 7517 +5514
+ Misses 5434 670 -4764
- Partials 131 235 +104 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
@palisadoes What should I do if rate limit exceeds for coderabbitai, is there any way to fix that by writing code? |
You'll just have to wait. It's a mechanism it uses to protect its free service |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (2)
471-500
: Add rate limit handling and retriesBased on the PR comments about rate limiting concerns, the script should implement retries and rate limit handling.
Add this before the curl command:
+ max_retries=3 + retry_count=0 + while [ $retry_count -lt $max_retries ]; do + rate_limit=$(curl -s -f -H "Authorization: token ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}" \ + https://api.github.com/rate_limit) + remaining=$(echo "$rate_limit" | jq .rate.remaining) + if [ "$remaining" -le 0 ]; then + reset_time=$(echo "$rate_limit" | jq .rate.reset) + current_time=$(date +%s) + sleep_time=$((reset_time - current_time + 1)) + echo "Rate limit exceeded. Waiting for $sleep_time seconds..." + sleep $sleep_time + fi + # Your existing curl command here + if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then + break + fi + retry_count=$((retry_count + 1)) + if [ $retry_count -lt $max_retries ]; then + echo "Retrying... Attempt $((retry_count + 1)) of $max_retries" + sleep 5 + fi + done🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
472-472: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2181:style:4:6: Check exit code directly with e.g. 'if ! mycmd;', not indirectly with $?
(shellcheck)
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 474-474: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 485-485: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 500-500: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
485-485
: Fix formatting issuesThere are trailing spaces and a missing newline at the end of file.
- Remove trailing spaces on line 485
- Add a newline at the end of file (line 500)
Also applies to: 500-500
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 485-485: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
472-472: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2181:style:4:6: Check exit code directly with e.g. 'if ! mycmd;', not indirectly with $?
(shellcheck)
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
[error] 474-474: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 485-485: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 500-500: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (3)
466-470
: LGTM: Job configuration is well-structured
The job is properly integrated into the workflow with appropriate dependencies and configuration.
476-479
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove redundant error check
This error check becomes redundant after implementing the suggested curl improvements above.
- if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
- echo "Error: Failed to fetch PR reviews"
- exit 1
- fi
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
473-474
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Fix trailing spaces and improve curl error handling
The curl command should handle errors directly instead of checking $?
afterward.
Apply this diff:
- reviews=$(curl -s -H "Authorization: token ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}" \
- https://api.github.com/repos/${{ github.repository }}/pulls/${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}/reviews)
+ if ! reviews=$(curl -s -f -H "Authorization: token ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}" \
+ https://api.github.com/repos/${{ github.repository }}/pulls/${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}/reviews); then
+ echo "Error: Failed to fetch PR reviews"
+ exit 1
+ fi
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 474-474: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
With fewer files you may not have the rate limiting problem |
Oh ok |
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (1)
476-479
: Improve shell script practices and formatting.
- Use direct command status check
- Remove trailing spaces
Apply this diff to improve the shell script:
- reviews=$(curl -s -H "Authorization: token ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}" \ - https://api.github.com/repos/${{ github.repository }}/pulls/${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}/reviews) - - if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then - echo "Error: Failed to fetch PR reviews" - exit 1 - fi + if ! reviews=$(curl -s -H "Authorization: token ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}" \ + https://api.github.com/repos/${{ github.repository }}/pulls/${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}/reviews); then + echo "Error: Failed to fetch PR reviews" + exit 1 + fiAlso applies to: 474-474, 485-485
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
472-472: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2181:style:4:6: Check exit code directly with e.g. 'if ! mycmd;', not indirectly with $?
(shellcheck)
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
[error] 474-474: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 485-485: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (3)
466-470
: LGTM! Job definition and dependencies are well structured.
The job is correctly placed in the workflow and depends on all necessary quality check jobs.
471-498
: LGTM! Comprehensive error handling implementation.
The implementation includes all recommended error handling for API calls and JSON parsing.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
472-472: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2181:style:4:6: Check exit code directly with e.g. 'if ! mycmd;', not indirectly with $?
(shellcheck)
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 474-474: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 485-485: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
499-500
: LGTM! Secure token usage.
The GitHub token is correctly configured using secrets.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh (1)
1-5
:⚠️ Potential issueAdd input validation and rate limit handling.
The script should validate required environment variables and handle GitHub API rate limits.
Previous review comments about adding input validation for GITHUB_TOKEN and rate limit handling are still applicable here.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Shellcheck (0.10.0)
[error] 1-1: Tips depend on target shell and yours is unknown. Add a shebang or a 'shell' directive.
(SC2148)
🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch
[warning] 1-1:
File ignored by default.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh (1)
20-21
: Make debug output conditional.Debug output should be controlled by an environment variable to avoid verbose logs in production.
Add conditional debug output:
+DEBUG=${DEBUG:-false} + -echo "Debug: Combined reviews from all pages:" -echo "$all_reviews" | jq '.' +if [ "$DEBUG" = "true" ]; then + echo "Debug: Combined reviews from all pages:" + echo "$all_reviews" | jq '.' +fi
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Shellcheck (0.10.0)
.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh
[error] 1-1: Tips depend on target shell and yours is unknown. Add a shebang or a 'shell' directive.
(SC2148)
🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch
.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh
[warning] 1-1:
File ignored by default.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh (1)
34-44
: LGTM! Robust approval validation logic.
The approval validation logic is well-implemented with proper numeric validation and clear error messages.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh (2)
1-6
:⚠️ Potential issueAdd validation for required environment variables.
The script requires several environment variables (GITHUB_TOKEN, PR_NUMBER, GITHUB_REPOSITORY) but doesn't validate their presence.
Apply this diff after line 1:
#!/bin/bash +# Validate required environment variables +for var in GITHUB_TOKEN PR_NUMBER GITHUB_REPOSITORY; do + if [ -z "${!var:-}" ]; then + echo "Error: $var environment variable is not set" + exit 1 + fi +done + echo "Step 1: Fetching all PR reviews with pagination..."🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch
[warning] 1-1:
File ignored by default.
7-22
:⚠️ Potential issueAdd rate limit check before API calls.
While the pagination logic is solid, the script should check GitHub API rate limits before making requests.
Add rate limit check before the while loop:
+# Check rate limit status +rate_limit=$(curl -s -H "Authorization: token $GITHUB_TOKEN" \ + "https://api.github.com/rate_limit") || { + echo "Error: Failed to check rate limit" + exit 1 +} + +remaining=$(echo "$rate_limit" | jq '.rate.remaining') +reset_time=$(echo "$rate_limit" | jq '.rate.reset') + +if [ "$remaining" -lt 1 ]; then + echo "Error: GitHub API rate limit exceeded. Resets at $(date -d @$reset_time)" + exit 1 +fi + while true; do
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh (3)
24-28
: Add debug mode control.Debug output should be controlled by an environment variable to avoid verbose output in production.
Apply this diff:
+# Enable debug output if DEBUG=1 +debug_log() { + if [ "${DEBUG:-0}" = "1" ]; then + echo "Debug: $1" + [ -n "${2:-}" ] && echo "$2" | jq '.' + fi +} + -echo "Debug: Combined reviews from all pages:" -echo "$all_reviews" | jq '.' +debug_log "Combined reviews from all pages:" "$all_reviews"
29-44
: Document complex jq transformations.The jq commands perform complex transformations that would benefit from detailed documentation.
Add comments explaining the jq operations:
echo "Step 2: Parsing the latest review by each user..." +# jq transformation steps: +# 1. '[.[]]' - Convert the input into an array +# 2. 'group_by(.user.login)' - Group reviews by user +# 3. 'map(max_by(.submitted_at))' - Select most recent review per user latest_reviews=$(echo "$reviews" | jq -c '[.[]] | group_by(.user.login) | map(max_by(.submitted_at))') || { echo "Error: Failed to process reviews JSON" exit 1 }
46-56
: Enhance approval validation logic.Consider checking the review body for additional context to ensure the approval is valid and not conditional.
Apply this diff:
echo "Step 4: Checking approval status of 'coderabbitai[bot]'..." -approval_state=$(echo "$latest_reviews" | jq -r '[.[] | select(.user.login == "coderabbitai[bot]" and .state == "APPROVED")] | length') +# Check for both approval state and review body +approval_check=$(echo "$latest_reviews" | jq -r '[.[] | select( + .user.login == "coderabbitai[bot]" and + .state == "APPROVED" and + (.body | test("(?i)conditional|with changes") | not) +)] | length') -echo "Approval count for CodeRabbit.ai: $approval_state" +echo "Valid approval count for CodeRabbit.ai: $approval_check" -if [[ "$approval_state" =~ ^[0-9]+$ ]] && [[ $approval_state -gt 0 ]]; then +if [[ "$approval_check" =~ ^[0-9]+$ ]] && [[ $approval_check -gt 0 ]]; then
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch
.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh
[warning] 1-1:
File ignored by default.
I think there is a limit for how much GitHub comments are fetched, as its taking the previous comments not the latest one. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- See comments.
- I may have been wrong about the suitability of making this a script.
Sorry. I've been reviewing so many PRs
Please make the necessary changes. We'd like to get this merged quickly. |
Ok I will check the comments and fix the issues by tomorrow. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh (2)
22-26
: Improve debug output handlingThe current debug output could expose sensitive information and the variable reassignment is unnecessary.
Apply these improvements:
-echo "Debug: Combined reviews from all pages:" -echo "$all_reviews" | jq '.' +# Only show debug output if DEBUG is enabled +if [ "${DEBUG:-}" = "1" ]; then + echo "Debug: Combined reviews from all pages:" + echo "$all_reviews" | jq 'map({user: .user.login, state: .state, submitted_at: .submitted_at})' +fi -reviews="$all_reviews" +# Use all_reviews directly instead of reassigning
38-42
: Consolidate debug output handlingSimilar to the earlier debug output, this should be controlled by the DEBUG environment variable.
Apply this change:
-echo "Debug: Grouped latest reviews:" -echo "$latest_reviews" | jq '.' +if [ "${DEBUG:-}" = "1" ]; then + echo "Debug: Grouped latest reviews:" + echo "$latest_reviews" | jq '.' +fi echo "Step 3: Printing all latest review user logins and states:"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch
.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh
[warning] 1-1:
File ignored by default.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh (1)
1-5
:
Add validation for required environment variables
The script relies on environment variables (GITHUB_TOKEN
, GITHUB_REPOSITORY
, PR_NUMBER
) but doesn't validate their presence at the start.
Add this validation block after the shebang line:
#!/bin/bash
+
+# Validate required environment variables
+for var in GITHUB_TOKEN GITHUB_REPOSITORY PR_NUMBER; do
+ if [ -z "${!var}" ]; then
+ echo "Error: $var environment variable is not set"
+ exit 1
+ fi
+done
+
echo "Step 1: Fetching all PR reviews with pagination..."
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch
[warning] 1-1:
File ignored by default.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh (4)
17-18
: Add conditional debug loggingDebug output should be controlled by an environment variable to prevent exposing sensitive information and impacting performance with large responses.
+# Enable debug output if DEBUG=1 +DEBUG="${DEBUG:-0}" + echo "Debug: Combined reviews from all pages:" -echo "$all_reviews" | jq '.' +if [ "$DEBUG" = "1" ]; then + echo "$all_reviews" | jq '.' +fi
33-34
: Maintain consistency in debug output handlingApply the same conditional debug logging pattern here for consistency.
echo "Debug: Grouped latest reviews:" -echo "$latest_reviews" | jq '.' +if [ "$DEBUG" = "1" ]; then + echo "$latest_reviews" | jq '.' +fi
44-49
: Enhance numeric validation for approval stateThe current numeric validation could be more robust to handle edge cases.
-if [[ "$approval_state" =~ ^[0-9]+$ ]] && [[ $approval_state -gt 0 ]]; then +if [[ "$approval_state" =~ ^[0-9]+$ ]] && [ "$approval_state" -gt 0 ] 2>/dev/null; then echo "Success: PR approved by CodeRabbit.ai." else - echo "Error: PR is not approved by CodeRabbit.ai." + if ! [[ "$approval_state" =~ ^[0-9]+$ ]]; then + echo "Error: Invalid approval state format" + else + echo "Error: PR is not approved by CodeRabbit.ai." + fi exit 1 fi
1-49
: Consider splitting the script into functions for better maintainabilityThe script would benefit from being split into functions for better organization and reusability:
validate_env_vars()
fetch_reviews()
process_reviews()
check_approval()
This would make the code more maintainable and easier to test.
Would you like me to provide an example of how to restructure the script using functions?
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch
[warning] 1-1:
File ignored by default.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch
.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh
[warning] 1-1:
File ignored by default.
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/scripts/validate-coderabbit.sh (3)
1-5
: Add validation for required environment variables
The script requires several environment variables (GITHUB_TOKEN, GITHUB_REPOSITORY, PR_NUMBER) but doesn't validate their presence at startup.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch
[warning] 1-1:
File ignored by default.
8-12
: Fix pagination implementation issues
The current implementation has several issues:
per_page=1000
exceeds GitHub's maximum of 100 items per page- Missing proper pagination handling using Link headers
39-40
: Parameterize the bot name
The bot name 'coderabbitai[bot]' should be configurable via environment variable.
@palisadoes its working now i will just make the code proper and remove debug print statements and commit |
@palisadoes Please check now I have commited the cleaned code |
1ef2d56
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Added Code Rabbit Approval Check to pull-request.yml Workflow
Issue Number:
Fixes #3003
Did you add tests for your changes?
No
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
No
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit