Increased code coverage of src/components/UserPortal/EventCard/EventCard.tsx #3267
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
WalkthroughThis pull request focuses on improving error handling and test coverage for the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/components/UserPortal/EventCard/EventCard.spec.tsx (1)
146-146: Enhance test coverage with additional scenariosTo further improve code coverage, consider adding these test cases:
- Loading state verification
- Different error type handling
Here's a suggested implementation:
it('should show loading state while registration is in progress', async () => { const loadingMocks = [ { request: { query: REGISTER_EVENT, variables: { eventId: '123' }, }, result: new Promise(() => {}), // Never resolves to keep loading }, ]; const loadingLink = new StaticMockLink(loadingMocks, true); render( <MockedProvider addTypename={false} link={loadingLink}> <BrowserRouter> <Provider store={store}> <I18nextProvider i18n={i18nForTest}> <ToastContainer /> <EventCard {...props} /> </I18nextProvider> </Provider> </BrowserRouter> </MockedProvider>, ); userEvent.click(screen.getByText('Register')); await waitFor(() => { expect(screen.getByTestId('loading-icon')).toBeInTheDocument(); }); }); it('should handle different error types gracefully', async () => { const errorMocks = [ { request: { query: REGISTER_EVENT, variables: { eventId: '123' }, }, error: { networkError: new Error('Network error') }, }, ]; const errorLink = new StaticMockLink(errorMocks, true); render( <MockedProvider addTypename={false} link={errorLink}> <BrowserRouter> <Provider store={store}> <I18nextProvider i18n={i18nForTest}> <ToastContainer /> <EventCard {...props} /> </I18nextProvider> </Provider> </BrowserRouter> </MockedProvider>, ); userEvent.click(screen.getByText('Register')); await waitFor(() => { expect(screen.getByText('Failed to register for the event: Network error')).toBeInTheDocument(); }); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/components/UserPortal/EventCard/EventCard.spec.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/UserPortal/EventCard/EventCard.tsx(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: Test Application
- GitHub Check: Check Python Code Style
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)
- GitHub Check: Checks if number of files changed is acceptable
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3267 +/- ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage 8.49% 90.26% +81.77%
=====================================================
Files 309 330 +21
Lines 7832 8493 +661
Branches 1730 1875 +145
=====================================================
+ Hits 665 7666 +7001
+ Misses 7093 597 -6496
- Partials 74 230 +156 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
palisadoes
approved these changes
Jan 14, 2025
palisadoes
merged commit a23d95b
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
19 checks passed
6 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Testing
Issue Number:
Fixes #3069
Snapshots/Videos:
N/A
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
No
Summary
Added a test case to increase Code Coverage of src/components/UserPortal/EventCard/EventCard.tsx
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests