Migrated AddPeopleToTag.test.tsx from jest to vitest #3303
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request focuses on refactoring the test file Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.test.tsx (1)
Migration complete but setup files need attention
The test file has been correctly migrated to Vitest with all necessary changes:
- All Jest imports replaced with Vitest equivalents
- Proper usage of
vifor mocking- Correct test assertions and structure
However, the setup files (setupTests.ts) still contain Jest-specific code that needs to be migrated to Vitest.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-286: Verify test suite execution with Vitest.The migration from Jest to Vitest looks complete. Please verify that:
- The test suite runs successfully with Vitest
- All assertions work as expected
- The test coverage remains at or above 95% as mentioned in the PR objectives
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test execution and coverage with Vitest # Note: Adjust the command based on your package.json script # Run tests and check coverage vitest run --coverage src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.test.tsxLength of output: 174
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining Jest-specific imports or APIs rg -i "jest" --type ts --type tsx # Check Vitest usage patterns rg -i "vitest|test|describe|expect|vi\." --type ts --type tsx -A 2 -B 2 # Look for test setup files that might need migration fd -e ts -e tsx -e js "setup|config.*test"Length of output: 312
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check setup files content cat setup.ts vitest.setup.ts src/setupTests.ts # Search for Jest/Vitest patterns without file type constraints rg -l "jest" # Check the specific test file implementation cat src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.test.tsxLength of output: 15027
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
[error] 3-3: Jest failed to parse file due to unexpected 'export' token in vitest import. Test suite failed to run.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.test.tsx (1)
Line range hint
95-114: Remove duplicate mock cleanup.The
vi.clearAllMocks()is called in bothbeforeEachandafterEachhooks, which is redundant.beforeEach(() => { vi.mock('react-router-dom', async () => { const actual = await vi.importActual('react-router-dom'); return { ...actual, useParams: () => ({ orgId: '1', tagId: '1' }), }; }); - vi.clearAllMocks(); }); afterEach(() => { vi.clearAllMocks(); cleanup(); });🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
[error] 3-3: Jest failed to parse file due to unexpected 'export' token in vitest import. Test suite failed to run.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.test.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: bitbard3
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2588
File: src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.spec.tsx:145-155
Timestamp: 2024-12-02T04:20:11.745Z
Learning: In PRs focused solely on refactoring test cases from Jest to Vitest, avoid suggesting optimizations or changes outside the migration scope.
Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2398
File: src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.test.tsx:177-241
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:58.654Z
Learning: In `src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.test.tsx`, prefer keeping test cases separate and more readable, even if it involves some duplication, instead of extracting common logic into helper functions.
src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.test.tsx (2)
Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2355
File: src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.test.tsx:44-50
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:58.654Z
Learning: The translations setup in test files may require deep cloning of translation objects using `JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(...))` to prevent errors.
Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2398
File: src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.test.tsx:177-241
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:58.654Z
Learning: In `src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.test.tsx`, prefer keeping test cases separate and more readable, even if it involves some duplication, instead of extracting common logic into helper functions.
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.test.tsx
[error] 3-3: Jest failed to parse file due to unexpected 'export' token in vitest import. Test suite failed to run.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.test.tsx (2)
Line range hint
30-43: LGTM! Proper mock setup with Vitest.The mock setup correctly uses Vitest's
vi.mock()and follows the best practice of deep cloning translations as per previous learnings.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
[error] 3-3: Jest failed to parse file due to unexpected 'export' token in vitest import. Test suite failed to run.
Line range hint
116-286: LGTM! Well-structured test cases.The test cases:
- Correctly use Vitest's expect assertions
- Maintain separation for readability as per previous learnings
- Consistently handle async operations with waitFor
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
[error] 3-3: Jest failed to parse file due to unexpected 'export' token in vitest import. Test suite failed to run.
| import '@testing-library/jest-dom'; | ||
| import React from 'react'; | ||
| import { vi, expect, describe, it } from 'vitest'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix Jest parsing error in pipeline.
The pipeline is failing because Jest is still trying to parse this file. This suggests that the Jest configuration needs to be updated to exclude this file from Jest's test patterns.
Please update the Jest configuration to exclude this file. You can add it to the testPathIgnorePatterns in your Jest config:
// jest.config.js
module.exports = {
testPathIgnorePatterns: [
+ 'src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.test.tsx',
],
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| import '@testing-library/jest-dom'; | |
| import React from 'react'; | |
| import { vi, expect, describe, it } from 'vitest'; | |
| // jest.config.js | |
| module.exports = { | |
| testPathIgnorePatterns: [ | |
| 'src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.test.tsx', | |
| ], | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
[error] 3-3: Jest failed to parse file due to unexpected 'export' token in vitest import. Test suite failed to run.
|
@gracefullcoder Please fix the failed tests and ensure coderabbit approves of your changes. |
|
Please make a minor commit. The failing test should be fixed with that |
|
Ensure code rabbit approves your PR |
|
Duplicate of @gracefullcoder Thanks for effort. Closing |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Replace Jest-specific functions and mocks with Vitest equivalents in AddPeopleToTag.test.tsx testing file
Issue Number:
Fixes #2789
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
No
Summary
As mentioned refactored jest to vitest and all test passed
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Summary by CodeRabbit
AddPeopleToTagcomponent