-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 868
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactored CSS in src/components/UpdateSession/UpdateSession.tsx #3506
Refactored CSS in src/components/UpdateSession/UpdateSession.tsx #3506
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@aadhil2k4 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 6 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe pull request focuses on refactoring CSS for the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/components/UpdateSession/UpdateSession.tsx
(0 hunks)src/style/app.module.css
(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/components/UpdateSession/UpdateSession.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Test Application
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/style/app.module.css (2)
914-916
: Clarify Slider Thumb Background Color VariableThe
.slider .MuiSlider-thumb
rule sets its background color tovar(--slider-bg) !important;
even though the PR summary indicates that the new global variable--slider-rail-bg
(defined as#e6e6e6
) should be used. Please verify if this discrepancy is intentional. If the intention is for both the thumb and the rail to have a consistent background based on--slider-rail-bg
, the thumb’s background should be updated accordingly.
918-919
: Slider Rail Styling Appears CorrectThe
.slider .MuiSlider-rail
rule appliesbackground-color: var(--slider-rail-bg) !important;
, which is consistent with the new variable introduced in the file. This helps ensure that the slider rail uses the expected color.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3506 +/- ##
=================================================
Coverage 88.74% 88.74%
=================================================
Files 338 338
Lines 8630 8630
Branches 1922 1922
=================================================
Hits 7659 7659
Misses 638 638
Partials 333 333 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
16e1632
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Refactoring
Issue Number:
Fixes #2904
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
NA
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
--slider-rail-bg
with a light gray color (#e6e6e6)UpdateSession
component