-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update push.yml #2900
Update push.yml #2900
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow configuration in Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/push.yml
(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/push.yml
31-31: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:11: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/push.yml (1)
17-20
: Verify the existence of the CI environment file.Please ensure that
./envFiles/.env.ci
exists in the repository and contains the necessary configuration for CI testing.✅ Verification successful
CI environment file exists and contains all required configurations
The
.env.ci
file is present and includes comprehensive configuration for the API, database, storage, and proxy services needed for CI testing.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and contents of CI env file # Check if the CI env file exists if [ -f "./envFiles/.env.ci" ]; then echo "✓ CI env file exists" # Check if it contains essential variables (without revealing sensitive data) grep -E "^[^=]+" ./envFiles/.env.ci | sort else echo "✗ CI env file is missing" fiLength of output: 2411
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
.github/workflows/push.yml (2)
21-23
: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Add error handling to Docker build step.
While the Docker setup is functional, it lacks error handling for the build step.
29-33
:⚠️ Potential issueFix shell scripting issues in coverage extraction.
The current implementation has potential issues with unquoted variables and missing error handling.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
31-31: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:11: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/push.yml
(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/push.yml
31-31: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:11: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/push.yml (1)
43-48
:⚠️ Potential issueCritical: Coverage threshold inconsistency detected.
There's a significant discrepancy:
- PR claims test coverage meets/exceeds 95%
- Workflow enforces only 39% minimum coverage
This low threshold could allow future contributions to significantly reduce coverage without detection. Since the current coverage is claimed to be 95%, consider setting the threshold closer to the actual coverage.
Let's verify the current coverage:
7671150
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
This reverts commit 7671150.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
bugfix
Issue Number:
Fixes #2854
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit