Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update push.yml #2900

Conversation

VanshikaSabharwal
Copy link

@VanshikaSabharwal VanshikaSabharwal commented Jan 25, 2025

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
bugfix

Issue Number:

Fixes #2854

Snapshots/Videos:

Screenshot from 2025-01-25 11-10-54
Screenshot from 2025-01-25 11-12-35
Screenshot from 2025-01-25 11-12-48
Screenshot from 2025-01-25 11-19-30

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

Summary

  • Updated the push.yml in order to upload the code coverage file to codecov website.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

Checklist

CodeRabbit AI Review

  • I have reviewed and addressed all critical issues flagged by CodeRabbit AI
  • I have implemented or provided justification for each non-critical suggestion
  • I have documented my reasoning in the PR comments where CodeRabbit AI suggestions were not implemented

Test Coverage

  • I have written tests for all new changes/features
  • I have verified that test coverage meets or exceeds 95%
  • I have run the test suite locally and all tests pass

Other information

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub Actions workflow for testing
    • Implemented Docker-based testing environment
    • Added code coverage validation with a 39.0% minimum threshold

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 25, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow configuration in .github/workflows/push.yml, transitioning from a direct testing approach to a containerized testing strategy. The new workflow creates a .env file for the Talawa API testing environment, builds a Docker compose environment, and runs tests within that environment. A new step using the very_good_coverage action has been added to validate code coverage, setting a minimum threshold of 39.0%.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/push.yml Replaced direct dependency installation and testing with Docker-based testing workflow, added code coverage validation step

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Restore CodeCov GitHub Action to develop-postgres
Enable code coverage statistics

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

ignore-sensitive-files-pr

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3899126 and fd0ce26.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/push.yml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/push.yml

31-31: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:11: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/push.yml (1)

17-20: Verify the existence of the CI environment file.

Please ensure that ./envFiles/.env.ci exists in the repository and contains the necessary configuration for CI testing.

✅ Verification successful

CI environment file exists and contains all required configurations

The .env.ci file is present and includes comprehensive configuration for the API, database, storage, and proxy services needed for CI testing.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and contents of CI env file

# Check if the CI env file exists
if [ -f "./envFiles/.env.ci" ]; then
    echo "✓ CI env file exists"
    # Check if it contains essential variables (without revealing sensitive data)
    grep -E "^[^=]+" ./envFiles/.env.ci | sort
else
    echo "✗ CI env file is missing"
fi

Length of output: 2411

.github/workflows/push.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/push.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/push.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jan 25, 2025
Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
.github/workflows/push.yml (2)

21-23: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Add error handling to Docker build step.

While the Docker setup is functional, it lacks error handling for the build step.


29-33: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix shell scripting issues in coverage extraction.

The current implementation has potential issues with unquoted variables and missing error handling.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

31-31: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:11: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fd0ce26 and fe2d9b3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/push.yml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/push.yml

31-31: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:11: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/push.yml (1)

43-48: ⚠️ Potential issue

Critical: Coverage threshold inconsistency detected.

There's a significant discrepancy:

  • PR claims test coverage meets/exceeds 95%
  • Workflow enforces only 39% minimum coverage

This low threshold could allow future contributions to significantly reduce coverage without detection. Since the current coverage is claimed to be 95%, consider setting the threshold closer to the actual coverage.

Let's verify the current coverage:

.github/workflows/push.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
@palisadoes palisadoes merged commit 7671150 into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Jan 25, 2025
15 of 16 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 25, 2025
2 tasks
palisadoes added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2025
palisadoes added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2025
palisadoes added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2025
palisadoes added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2025
palisadoes added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2025
palisadoes added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants