GitHub Action to Test Basic DB Access and Updates #3223
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request updates the CI/CD workflow, environment configuration, scripts, documentation, and tests to shift sample data management toward enhanced database operations. A new job is introduced in the GitHub Actions workflow to check database connectivity and data accuracy, and its success is required for subsequent steps. The environment is now set to testing, dependencies and scripts for sample data import have been removed or replaced, and new scripts for database reset and sample data addition have been added along with comprehensive tests. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant RT as Run-Tests
participant SD as Sample-Data-Check
participant TD as Test-Docusaurus-Deployment
RT->>SD: Complete tests
SD->>SD: Check database connection, run migrations, validate records
SD-->>TD: On success, trigger deployment
TD->>TD: Perform documentation deployment
sequenceDiagram
participant Dev as Developer
participant Reset as resetDB Script
participant DB as Database
Dev->>Reset: Initiate database reset
Reset->>DB: Ping database
DB-->>Reset: Return connection status
Reset->>Dev: Request user confirmation
Dev->>Reset: Confirm reset
Reset->>DB: Execute formatDatabase and ensure administrator exists
Reset->>DB: Disconnect from database
Reset-->>Dev: Return exit status
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3223 +/- ##
====================================================
+ Coverage 47.59% 48.36% +0.77%
====================================================
Files 455 457 +2
Lines 33940 34153 +213
Branches 866 942 +76
====================================================
+ Hits 16153 16518 +365
+ Misses 17787 17634 -153
- Partials 0 1 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
7 similar comments
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
JaiPannu-IITI
force-pushed
the
PR-Workflow-(DB)
branch
from
d488331 to
44d3e1a
Compare
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
JaiPannu-IITI
changed the title
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
…alawa-api into PR-Workflow-(DB)
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml(1 hunks)envFiles/.env.ci(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts(2 hunks)src/utilities/testDbConnection.ts(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/utilities/testDbConnection.ts (2)
11-23: Confirm proper error handling for DB connection.Here, the code configures the PostgreSQL client but doesn’t appear to handle or log immediate connection errors. Although drizzle-orm will throw an error if the connection fails at query time, proactively testing the connection upfront or catching errors upon creation can aid in debugging.
Do you want to confirm the connection immediately upon client creation (e.g., by running a simple query and handling errors) to ensure failures are caught early?
133-133: Invocation of the validation sequence.Calling
runValidation()at the end is appropriate for a standalone script.src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts (3)
4-10: Good practice using Argon2 and UUIDv7.Importing
@node-rs/argon2for password hashing is secure by default (it automatically handles salting), anduuidv7ensures unique IDs. This is a solid choice for password security and unique user identifiers.
101-150: Verify uniqueness constraints for administrator account.
ensureAdministratorExistschecks for an admin user by email and creates one if not found. Consider confirming that theemailAddressfield is uniquely constrained in your schema. Otherwise, concurrent runs (or a race condition) might create duplicates. It would also be beneficial to validate that
157-158: Ensuring admin is created before inserting data.Calling
ensureAdministratorExistsupfront ensures database operations can rely on a pre-existing admin. Excellent approach.envFiles/.env.ci (1)
42-42: SwitchingNODE_ENVto test is appropriate.Changing the environment from
productiontotestaligns with the new test-based workflows and scripts. This is correct for isolating test scenarios from production.package.json (1)
91-91: New DB Connection Script Integration Check
The addition of the"test:db-connection": "tsx ./src/utilities/testDbConnection.ts"script is clear and aligns well with the new CI job's requirements. It provides a dedicated command for invoking database connection tests in the test environment.
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
JaiPannu-IITI
force-pushed
the
PR-Workflow-(DB)
branch
from
0e5298c to
063d91a
Compare
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.test.ts(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
test/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.test.ts (4)
1-7: Consolidate test framework imports.The imports can be simplified by using a single import statement from
vitest.-import { afterEach, beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest"; +import { afterEach, beforeAll, beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
119-142: Use test.each for database record count verification.The database record count assertions are repetitive. Consider using
test.eachfor better maintainability.test.each([ ['organization_memberships', mockMembership.length + mockOrganization.length], ['users', mockUser.length + 1], ['organizations', mockOrganization.length] ])('should verify %s record count is %i', async (table, expectedCount) => { const consoleLogSpy = vi.spyOn(console, 'log').mockImplementation(() => {}); await helpers.checkDataSize("Current"); expect(consoleLogSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith( expect.stringContaining(`| ${table.padEnd(25)}| ${expectedCount.toString().padEnd(15)}|`) ); });
214-222: Enhance disconnection error test.The test should verify that the error is properly logged.
it("should return false if an error occurs during disconnection", async () => { + const consoleErrorSpy = vi.spyOn(console, 'error').mockImplementation(() => {}); vi.spyOn(helpers.queryClient, "end").mockRejectedValue( new Error("Database disconnection failed") ); const response = await helpers.disconnect(); expect(response).toBe(false); + expect(consoleErrorSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith( + expect.stringContaining("Database disconnection failed") + ); });
1-223: Add missing test coverage for database operations.The test suite is missing coverage for some error scenarios:
- Invalid collection names in
insertCollections- Network errors during database operations
- Edge cases in data validation
Run the following script to verify test coverage:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check test coverage for database operations # Find all database operation functions in the helpers file echo "Database operations defined in helpers:" ast-grep --pattern 'export async function $FUNC_NAME($_) { $$$ }' # Find corresponding test cases echo "\nTest coverage for database operations:" rg -A 2 'it\(".*database' test/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.test.ts
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
test/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.test.ts (3)
95-100:⚠️ Potential issueRemove unused variable in administrator test.
The
formatvariable is declared but its value is only used in an unnecessary assertion.it("should create an administrator user if none exists", async () => { - const format = await helpers.formatDatabase(); + await helpers.formatDatabase(); const response = await helpers.ensureAdministratorExists(); expect(response).toBe(true); - expect(format).toBe(true); });
216-224: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Enhance disconnection error test coverage.
The test only verifies the return value without checking error handling.
it("should return false if an error occurs during disconnection", async () => { + const consoleErrorSpy = vi.spyOn(console, 'error').mockImplementation(() => {}); vi.spyOn(helpers.queryClient, "end").mockRejectedValue( new Error("Database disconnection failed") ); const response = await helpers.disconnect(); expect(response).toBe(false); + expect(consoleErrorSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith( + expect.stringContaining("Database disconnection failed") + ); });
1-7: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsolidate test framework imports.
Remove the duplicate import from
node:testand consolidate all test framework imports fromvitest.-import { afterEach, beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest"; +import { + afterAll, + afterEach, + beforeEach, + describe, + expect, + it, + vi +} from "vitest";
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
test/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.test.ts(1 hunks)test/utilities/dbManagement/resetDB.test.ts(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
test/utilities/dbManagement/resetDB.test.ts (1)
114-130: Fix and implement the direct script execution test.The commented-out test has multiple issues:
- It references
addSampleDatainstead ofresetDB- It's incomplete and needs proper implementation
Either implement the test correctly or remove it. If implementing, here's a suggested fix:
-// it("should execute `main()` and call `disconnect()` when script is run directly", async () => { -// vi.spyOn(process, "argv", "get").mockReturnValue([ -// "node", -// actualScriptPath, -// ]); -// const processExitSpy = vi -// .spyOn(process, "exit") -// .mockImplementation(( ) => { }); - -// await import("src/utilities/dbManagement/addSampleData").then(async() => { -// await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 2000)); -// expect(mainModule.isMain).toBe(true); -// expect(processExitSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(0); -// }); - -// }); +it("should execute main() and call disconnect() when script is run directly", async () => { + const actualScriptPath = "src/utilities/dbManagement/resetDB"; + vi.spyOn(process, "argv", "get").mockReturnValue(["node", actualScriptPath]); + const processExitSpy = vi.spyOn(process, "exit").mockImplementation(() => {}); + const disconnectSpy = vi.spyOn(helpers, "disconnect").mockResolvedValue(true); + + await import(actualScriptPath); + + expect(mainModule.isMain).toBe(true); + expect(disconnectSpy).toHaveBeenCalled(); + expect(processExitSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(0); +});
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.ts(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.ts (6)
38-54: Consider faster table clearing viaTRUNCATE
UsingDELETE FROM ...in a loop is correct but can be slower for large tables. The TRUNCATE approach can reset entire tables more efficiently.
61-63: Environment variable consistency check
The code checksAPI_ADMINISTRATOR_USER_EMAIL_ADDRESSand throws here, which is good. However, it might be worth applying equally rigorous checks to other critical variables (e.g., database host, port) for a consistent fail-fast approach.
107-134: Refine JSON parsing error handling
While the catch block rethrows a generic error if an exception occurs, you could provide more detail around JSON parse failures. Distinguishing malformed JSON from missing files helps in debugging.
142-147: Expose underlying DB error for easier debugging
Currently, the catch block at line 145 throws a generic message. Revealing the original error message (e.g.,error.message) can help pinpoint connectivity or configuration problems faster.
163-173: Assess partial batch insert handling
When an error arises during one of the insert batches, rows in prior batches remain. Consider using a transaction-based approach or at least logging partial insert details to ensure data consistency in CI and production.
343-382: Add better handling for missing or renamed tables
If a table is dropped or renamed, the loop incheckDataSizefails. Wrapping each query in a try/catch or verifying the table existence can yield more actionable error messages.
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
1 similar comment
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
♻️ Duplicate comments (4)
test/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.test.ts (4)
115-120:⚠️ Potential issueRemove unused variable in administrator test.
The
formatvariable is declared but never meaningfully used, as flagged by the pipeline.it("should create an administrator user if none exists", async () => { - const format = await helpers.formatDatabase(); + await helpers.formatDatabase(); const response = await helpers.ensureAdministratorExists(); expect(response).toBe(true); - expect(format).toBe(true); });
21-32:⚠️ Potential issueFix test lifecycle hooks implementation.
The current implementation has several issues:
- Duplicate cleanup calls in
beforeEachandafterEach- Non-awaited async operations
- Unnecessary administrator creation in both hooks
beforeEach(async () => { vi.restoreAllMocks(); vi.resetModules(); - vi.unstubAllEnvs(); - helpers.ensureAdministratorExists(); + await helpers.formatDatabase(); + await helpers.ensureAdministratorExists(); }); afterEach(async () => { vi.unstubAllEnvs(); - vi.restoreAllMocks(); - helpers.ensureAdministratorExists(); + await helpers.disconnect(); });
236-244: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Enhance error handling test with error message verification.
The disconnection error test only verifies the return value but doesn't check if the error was properly logged or handled.
it("should return false if an error occurs during disconnection", async () => { + const consoleErrorSpy = vi.spyOn(console, 'error').mockImplementation(() => {}); vi.spyOn(helpers.queryClient, "end").mockRejectedValue( new Error("Database disconnection failed") ); const response = await helpers.disconnect(); expect(response).toBe(false); + expect(consoleErrorSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith( + expect.stringContaining("Database disconnection failed") + ); });
1-7: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsolidate test framework imports.
Remove the duplicate import from
node:testand consolidate all test framework imports fromvitest.-import { afterEach, beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest"; +import { afterEach, beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.test.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
test/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.test.ts
[error] 89-110: Formatter would have printed the following content indicating formatting issues. Please run the formatter to fix the code style.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
JaiPannu-IITI
force-pushed
the
PR-Workflow-(DB)
branch
from
0f8a75c to
e0c6b4a
Compare
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
♻️ Duplicate comments (12)
src/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.ts (4)
19-30: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Use explicit error messages or a valid default for DB port
Defaulting the port to1can lead to cryptic connection failures if the environment variable is missing or invalid. Throwing an error or using a commonly known valid port (e.g.,5432) may provide more predictable behavior.- port: Number(process.env.API_POSTGRES_PORT) || 1, + const rawPort = Number(process.env.API_POSTGRES_PORT ?? 5432); + if (Number.isNaN(rawPort) || rawPort <= 0) { + throw new Error("API_POSTGRES_PORT is missing or invalid."); + } + port: rawPort,
49-54: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Consider using TRUNCATE for faster table clearing
Repeatedly deleting rows can be slow for large datasets.TRUNCATE ... CASCADE(if foreign keys exist) typically offers better performance when resetting tables.-for (const row of tables) { - const tableName = row.tablename; - if (typeof tableName === "string") { - await db.execute(sql`DELETE FROM ${sql.identifier(tableName)}`); - } +for (const row of tables) { + const tableName = row.tablename; + if (typeof tableName === "string") { + await db.execute(sql`TRUNCATE TABLE ${sql.identifier(tableName)} CASCADE`); + } }
70-79: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Expand test coverage for administrative role updates
This block upgrades an existing user to administrator, but the coverage for this scenario can be improved. Adding a dedicated test ensures no regressions in role elevation logic.
265-283: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Restrict administrator membership to relevant organizations
Assigning the same admin user to all organizations may be desired for testing but risky for production. Make it opt-in or specify only the organizations that need an administrator.-const organizationAdminMembership = organizations.map((org) => ({ - organizationId: org.id, - memberId: API_ADMINISTRATOR_USER.id, - creatorId: API_ADMINISTRATOR_USER.id, - createdAt: new Date(), - role: "administrator", -})); +// e.g., filter organizations or make membership assignment configurable: +const eligibleOrgs = organizations.filter(org => /* custom condition */); +const organizationAdminMembership = eligibleOrgs.map((org) => ({ + ... +}));src/utilities/dbManagement/addSampleData.ts (3)
10-12: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Make collections configurable
Hardcoding the collections array reduces flexibility. Allowing them to be passed in via environment variables or CLI arguments provides more universal usage.- const collections = ["users", "organizations", "organization_memberships"]; + const collections = process.env.SAMPLE_DATA_COLLECTIONS + ? process.env.SAMPLE_DATA_COLLECTIONS.split(",") + : ["users", "organizations", "organization_memberships"];
13-37: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Unify top-level try/catch blocks
Currently, multiple try/catch blocks handle related database steps separately. A single overarching approach or structured error-handling function can reduce repetition and simplify debugging.try { await pingDB(); await ensureAdministratorExists(); await insertCollections(collections); console.log("\n\x1b[32mSuccess:\x1b[0m Sample Data added to the database"); } catch (error) { console.error(error); throw new Error("An error occurred while preparing sample data"); }
58-58: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Avoid forceful process termination
process.exit(0)can be acceptable for CLI usage, but it bypasses potential asynchronous tasks that might still be running. Consider letting the script end naturally or confirm that no additional operations are pending.test/utilities/dbManagement/addSampleData.test.ts (1)
102-118: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Finalize or remove commented-out test
Leaving the test commented out can cause confusion. Either complete the test to cover your main flow or remove it.test/utilities/dbManagement/resetDB.test.ts (2)
102-112: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionReplace hardcoded timeout with a more reliable approach.
Using a fixed timeout of 2000ms could make the test flaky. Consider using a more reliable approach such as waiting for a specific condition or event.
Apply this diff to improve the test:
-await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 2000)); +await vi.waitFor(() => { + return mainModule.isMain === false; +}, { + timeout: 5000, + interval: 100 +});
32-50: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Use regex pattern for error message assertion.
The current error message assertion is brittle as it expects an exact string match. Consider using a regex pattern to make the test more resilient to minor message changes.
Apply this diff to improve the error assertion:
-await expect(main()).rejects.toThrow("Database connection failed:"); +await expect(main()).rejects.toThrow(/Database connection failed/);test/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.test.ts (2)
21-32: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionImprove test lifecycle hooks implementation.
The hooks have the following issues:
- Duplicate cleanup calls between
beforeEachandafterEach.- Unnecessary administrator creation in both hooks.
Apply this diff to fix the hooks:
beforeEach(async () => { vi.restoreAllMocks(); vi.resetModules(); - vi.unstubAllEnvs(); - await helpers.ensureAdministratorExists(); + await helpers.formatDatabase(); + await helpers.ensureAdministratorExists(); }); afterEach(async () => { - vi.unstubAllEnvs(); - vi.restoreAllMocks(); - await helpers.ensureAdministratorExists(); + vi.unstubAllEnvs(); + await helpers.disconnect(); });🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
[error] 12-32: Formatter would have printed the following content: changes in formatting detected.
238-246: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Enhance error handling test with error message verification.
The disconnection error test only verifies the return value but doesn't check if the error was properly logged.
Apply this diff to improve the test:
it("should return false if an error occurs during disconnection", async () => { + const consoleErrorSpy = vi.spyOn(console, 'error').mockImplementation(() => {}); vi.spyOn(helpers.queryClient, "end").mockRejectedValue( new Error("Database disconnection failed") ); const response = await helpers.disconnect(); expect(response).toBe(false); + expect(consoleErrorSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith( + expect.stringContaining("Database disconnection failed") + ); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
src/utilities/dbManagement/addSampleData.ts(1 hunks)src/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.ts(1 hunks)test/utilities/dbManagement/addSampleData.test.ts(1 hunks)test/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.test.ts(1 hunks)test/utilities/dbManagement/resetDB.test.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
test/utilities/dbManagement/resetDB.test.ts
[error] 8-30: Formatter would have printed the following content: changes in formatting detected.
test/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.test.ts
[error] 12-32: Formatter would have printed the following content: changes in formatting detected.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
test/utilities/dbManagement/resetDB.test.ts (1)
17-30: LGTM!The test case is well-structured and thoroughly verifies the successful database formatting scenario by:
- Mocking user confirmation.
- Verifying database connection.
- Ensuring administrator access is restored.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
[error] 8-30: Formatter would have printed the following content: changes in formatting detected.
test/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.test.ts (1)
217-223: LGTM!The test effectively verifies that database formatting is restricted in production environment.
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
♻️ Duplicate comments (7)
src/utilities/dbManagement/addSampleData.ts (2)
11-11: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Consider making collections configurable.
The collections array is hardcoded, which reduces flexibility. Consider accepting collections as command-line arguments or environment variables.
-const collections = ["users", "organizations", "organization_memberships"]; +const collections = process.env.SAMPLE_DATA_COLLECTIONS?.split(',') || ["users", "organizations", "organization_memberships"];
13-36: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionStandardize error handling across operations.
Error handling varies between operations - some throw errors directly while others log before throwing. Consider a consistent approach.
try { await pingDB(); console.log("\n\x1b[32mSuccess:\x1b[0m Database connected successfully\n"); } catch (error) { - throw new Error(`Database connection failed: ${error}`); + console.error("\nError: Database connection failed", error); + throw new Error("Database connection failed"); } try { await ensureAdministratorExists().then(() => { console.log("\x1b[32mSuccess:\x1b[0m Administrator setup complete\n"); }); } catch (error) { console.error("\nError: Administrator creation failed", error); throw new Error( "\n\x1b[31mAdministrator access may be lost, try reimporting sample DB to restore access\x1b[0m\n" ); } try { await insertCollections(collections); console.log("\n\x1b[32mSuccess:\x1b[0m Sample Data added to the database"); } catch (error) { - console.error("Error: ", error); - throw new Error("Error adding sample data"); + console.error("\nError: Sample data insertion failed", error); + throw new Error("Sample data insertion failed"); }test/utilities/dbManagement/resetDB.test.ts (2)
8-15: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionImprove test lifecycle hooks implementation.
The lifecycle hooks have duplicate cleanup calls and non-awaited operations.
beforeEach(async () => { vi.resetModules(); - await helpers.ensureAdministratorExists(); + await helpers.formatDatabase(); + await helpers.ensureAdministratorExists(); }); afterEach(async () => { vi.restoreAllMocks(); - await helpers.ensureAdministratorExists(); + await helpers.disconnect(); });
109-109: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Replace hardcoded timeout with a more reliable approach.
Using a fixed timeout of 2000ms could make the test flaky.
-await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 2000)); +await vi.waitFor(() => !mainModule.isMain, { timeout: 5000 });test/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.test.ts (3)
115-120: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionRemove unused variable in administrator test.
The
formatvariable is declared but never meaningfully used.it("should create an administrator user if none exists", async () => { - const format = await helpers.formatDatabase(); + await helpers.formatDatabase(); const response = await helpers.ensureAdministratorExists(); expect(response).toBe(true); - expect(format).toBe(true); });
238-246: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Enhance error handling test with error message verification.
The disconnection error test only verifies the return value but doesn't check if the error was properly logged.
it("should return false if an error occurs during disconnection", async () => { + const consoleErrorSpy = vi.spyOn(console, 'error').mockImplementation(() => {}); vi.spyOn(helpers.queryClient, "end").mockRejectedValue( new Error("Database disconnection failed") ); const response = await helpers.disconnect(); expect(response).toBe(false); + expect(consoleErrorSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith( + expect.stringContaining("Database disconnection failed") + ); });
21-32: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionImprove test lifecycle hooks implementation.
The lifecycle hooks have duplicate cleanup calls and non-awaited operations.
beforeEach(async () => { vi.restoreAllMocks(); vi.resetModules(); - vi.unstubAllEnvs(); - await helpers.ensureAdministratorExists(); + await helpers.formatDatabase(); + await helpers.ensureAdministratorExists(); }); afterEach(async () => { - vi.unstubAllEnvs(); - vi.restoreAllMocks(); - await helpers.ensureAdministratorExists(); + vi.unstubAllEnvs(); + await helpers.disconnect(); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml(2 hunks)docs/docs/docs/developer-resources/testing.md(2 hunks)docs/docs/docs/getting-started/installation.md(1 hunks)envFiles/.env.ci(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)src/utilities/dbManagement/addSampleData.ts(1 hunks)src/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.ts(1 hunks)src/utilities/dbManagement/resetDB.ts(1 hunks)src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts(0 hunks)test/utilities/dbManagement/addSampleData.test.ts(1 hunks)test/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.test.ts(1 hunks)test/utilities/dbManagement/resetDB.test.ts(1 hunks)vitest.config.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
docs/docs/docs/developer-resources/testing.md
203-203: Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
204-204: Ordered list item prefix
Expected: 1; Actual: 3; Style: 1/1/1
(MD029, ol-prefix)
204-204: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
208-208: Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
209-209: Ordered list item prefix
Expected: 1; Actual: 4; Style: 1/1/1
(MD029, ol-prefix)
209-209: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
213-213: Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
214-214: Ordered list item prefix
Expected: 1; Actual: 5; Style: 1/1/1
(MD029, ol-prefix)
214-214: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
224-224: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
225-225: Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
227-227: Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
228-228: Ordered list item prefix
Expected: 1; Actual: 2; Style: 1/1/1
(MD029, ol-prefix)
228-228: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
228-228: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
229-229: Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
docs/docs/docs/getting-started/installation.md
399-399: Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
404-404: Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
410-410: Trailing spaces
Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 3
(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
src/utilities/dbManagement/addSampleData.ts
[warning] 47-63: src/utilities/dbManagement/addSampleData.ts#L47-L63
Added lines #L47 - L63 were not covered by tests
src/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.ts
[warning] 62-63: src/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.ts#L62-L63
Added lines #L62 - L63 were not covered by tests
[warning] 72-76: src/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.ts#L72-L76
Added lines #L72 - L76 were not covered by tests
[warning] 86-86: src/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.ts#L86
Added line #L86 was not covered by tests
[warning] 142-149: src/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.ts#L142-L149
Added lines #L142 - L149 were not covered by tests
[warning] 192-195: src/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.ts#L192-L195
Added lines #L192 - L195 were not covered by tests
[warning] 260-263: src/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.ts#L260-L263
Added lines #L260 - L263 were not covered by tests
[warning] 316-317: src/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.ts#L316-L317
Added lines #L316 - L317 were not covered by tests
[warning] 323-324: src/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.ts#L323-L324
Added lines #L323 - L324 were not covered by tests
[warning] 379-381: src/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.ts#L379-L381
Added lines #L379 - L381 were not covered by tests
[warning] 391-392: src/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.ts#L391-L392
Added lines #L391 - L392 were not covered by tests
src/utilities/dbManagement/resetDB.ts
[warning] 22-26: src/utilities/dbManagement/resetDB.ts#L22-L26
Added lines #L22 - L26 were not covered by tests
[warning] 70-70: src/utilities/dbManagement/resetDB.ts#L70
Added line #L70 was not covered by tests
[warning] 82-98: src/utilities/dbManagement/resetDB.ts#L82-L98
Added lines #L82 - L98 were not covered by tests
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
[error] 333-333: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
src/utilities/dbManagement/resetDB.ts (4)
20-26: Avoid forcing immediate process termination in production
You’re still callingprocess.exit(0)here, which may bypass standard cleanup and cause potential issues with asynchronous tasks. For better maintainability and testability, consider returning a non-zero exit code or throwing an error instead of directly exiting.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 22-26: src/utilities/dbManagement/resetDB.ts#L22-L26
Added lines #L22 - L26 were not covered by tests
27-35: Confirm prompt usage in CI
This segment usesinquirer.prompt, which is interactive. For CI pipelines, consider an environment-based override or an auto-confirm to avoid blocking prompts in automated runs.
70-70: Add missing test coverage for cancellation scenario
Line 70 handles a user’s decision to cancel the operation, but is not covered by tests. Please add a unit or integration test to verify that the script behaves correctly when cancellation occurs.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 70-70: src/utilities/dbManagement/resetDB.ts#L70
Added line #L70 was not covered by tests
82-99: Increase test coverage for cleanup flow
Lines 82-99 manage the script’s final stages (including disconnection). The static analysis indicates these lines are not covered by tests. Strengthen test coverage to ensure the script behaves correctly when errors occur in this final block.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 82-98: src/utilities/dbManagement/resetDB.ts#L82-L98
Added lines #L82 - L98 were not covered by testssrc/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.ts (5)
44-54: Consider faster table clearing via TRUNCATE
UsingDELETE FROMcan be slow for large datasets. Replacing it with aTRUNCATE ... CASCADEapproach would generally improve performance, as noted in earlier reviews.
70-81: Expand test coverage for admin role update scenario
These lines handle existing users who require a role change to administrator. Ensure you have a test that verifies the role update flow for an existing non-admin user.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 72-76: src/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.ts#L72-L76
Added lines #L72 - L76 were not covered by tests
142-149: Add test coverage for “pingDB” failure
IfpingDBthrows an error, it’s crucial to verify that the error is handled correctly and that dependent flows react as expected.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 142-149: src/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.ts#L142-L149
Added lines #L142 - L149 were not covered by tests
192-195: Add test coverage for missing administrator email scenario
WhenAPI_ADMINISTRATOR_USER_EMAIL_ADDRESSis absent, this logic raises an error. Confirm in tests that this scenario is caught and reported properly.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 192-195: src/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.ts#L192-L195
Added lines #L192 - L195 were not covered by tests
260-263: Address uncovered error paths
Static analysis shows that these lines lack test coverage. Specifically:
• Lines 260-263 (admin user not found)
• Lines 316-317 (invalid collection name)
• Lines 323-324 (error adding data)
• Lines 379-381 (error checking record count)
• Lines 391-392 (error disconnecting from database)Adding targeted tests for these failure paths will ensure the database management script is resilient and well-verified.
Also applies to: 316-317, 323-324, 379-381, 391-392
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 260-263: src/utilities/dbManagement/helpers.ts#L260-L263
Added lines #L260 - L263 were not covered by testsvitest.config.ts (1)
13-13: Timeout extension looks good
Extending the test timeout to 15 seconds can help accommodate slower database or network operations without false negatives.envFiles/.env.ci (1)
42-42: Confirm NODE_ENV Change for Test EnvironmentThe update from production to
NODE_ENV=testat line 42 looks correct. This change ensures that the CI/test runs pick up the proper environment configuration.package.json (1)
91-92: Update Database Management ScriptsThe removal of the old
"import:sample-data"script and the addition of the new"reset:db"and"add:sample_data"scripts are clearly reflected on lines 91–92. These changes align well with the new database management approach described in the PR objectives..github/workflows/pull-request.yml (1)
247-250: Updated Dependencies for Subsequent JobsThe dependency of the
Test-Docusaurus-Deploymentjob now correctly includes bothRun-Testsand the newly addedSample-Data-Checkjob (line 249). This ensures that downstream deployment steps only run after both test suites pass.
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 15
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
docs/docs/docs/developer-resources/testing.md(2 hunks)docs/docs/docs/getting-started/installation.md(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)scripts/dbManagement/addSampleData.ts(1 hunks)scripts/dbManagement/helpers.ts(1 hunks)scripts/dbManagement/resetDB.ts(1 hunks)test/scripts/dbManagement/addSampleData.test.ts(1 hunks)test/scripts/dbManagement/helpers.test.ts(1 hunks)test/scripts/dbManagement/resetDB.test.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
scripts/dbManagement/helpers.ts (2)
88-93: Verify the impact of forcing administrator role on existing users.Currently, any user matching the configured admin email address is forcibly assigned the administrator role. Verify that this behavior won’t override an intentionally different role.
281-299: Confirm the necessity of admin memberships for all organizations.Currently, each organization automatically grants administrator status to the admin user, bypassing any existing membership structure. Ensure this is desired and doesn't cause conflicts with other roles or membership policies.
scripts/dbManagement/addSampleData.ts (1)
45-65: Graceful disconnect and final logging look good.The script neatly exits with an appropriate status code, ensuring proper cleanup. Great job!
scripts/dbManagement/resetDB.ts (1)
51-59: Ensure administrator creation is handled consistently.Failing to create an administrator user here leaves the database without admin access. Consider exiting early or rolling back changes if administrator setup is critical.
package.json (2)
89-90: LGTM! Clear and descriptive script names.The new script names
reset:dbandadd:sample_dataare clear and follow the existing naming convention.
56-58:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify Node.js version compatibility.
The specified Node.js version 23.7.0 is very recent. Ensure it's compatible with all dependencies and CI environment.
🌐 Web query:
What is the latest LTS version of Node.js?💡 Result:
The latest Long Term Support (LTS) version of Node.js as of February 20, 2025, is Node.js v22.x (codename "Jod")[1][3][7]. This version transitioned to Active LTS status on October 29, 2024[1][3], and will receive critical updates and security support until April 2027[1][3].
Key details:
- Active LTS phase: Until October 2025[1][3]
- Maintenance LTS phase: October 2025 - April 2027[1][3]
- Notable features:
- Built-in WebSocket client enabled by default[1]
- Updated OpenSSL 3.x support with security updates through September 2026[3]
- Enhanced stability for production environments[1]
The current recommended installation is Node.js v22.14.0 according to official sources[5][7]. This replaces previous LTS versions like Node.js v20 ("Iron"), which entered Maintenance LTS in April 2026[2][8].
Developers should upgrade to v22.x for long-term support and security updates, particularly since Node.js v20 is now in maintenance mode with only critical fixes being applied[1][8].
Citations:
- 1: http://nodesource.com/blog/Node.js-v22-Long-Term-Support-LTS/
- 2: https://daily.dev/blog/nodejs-v20-lts-is-now-generally-available-and-its-awesome
- 3: https://nodejs.org/en/blog/release/v22.11.0
- 4: https://www.npmjs.com/package/node-lts-versions
- 5: https://nodejs.org/en/about/previous-releases
- 6: https://www.nearform.com/digital-community/node-js-release-schedule-explained
- 7: https://nodejs.org/en
- 8: https://endoflife.date/nodejs
- 9: https://github.com/nodejs/Release
Action: Verify Node.js Version Compatibility
The package.json currently specifies Node.js 23.7.0. Given that the latest LTS release as of February 2025 is Node.js v22.x (with a recommended version around 22.14.0), please ensure that:
- Dependencies & CI: All dependencies and the CI environment are fully compatible with Node.js 23.7.0.
- Production Stability: If production stability and long-term support are priorities, consider using the LTS version (Node.js v22.x).
"engines": { - "node": "23.7.0" + "node": "23.7.0" // Verify compatibility or consider switching to LTS (v22.x) }
| export async function formatDatabase(): Promise<boolean> { | ||
| if (process.env.NODE_ENV === "production") { | ||
| throw new Error( | ||
| "\n\x1b[31mRestricted: Resetting the database in production is not allowed\x1b[0m\n", | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const tables = await db.execute(sql` | ||
| SELECT tablename FROM pg_catalog.pg_tables | ||
| WHERE schemaname = 'public' | ||
| `); | ||
|
|
||
| for (const row of tables) { | ||
| const tableName = row.tablename; | ||
| if (typeof tableName === "string") { | ||
| await db.execute(sql`DELETE FROM ${sql.identifier(tableName)}`); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return true; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider using TRUNCATE for faster cleanup and to simplify foreign key handling.
Repeatedly running DELETE FROM on each table might be slow for large data sets, and foreign key constraints can pose issues. TRUNCATE ... CASCADE can handle large tables more efficiently and automatically remove dependent data.
| console.log( | ||
| `${"| File Name".padEnd(30)}| Document Count | | ||
| ${"|".padEnd(30, "-")}|----------------| | ||
| `, | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| for (const file of files) { | ||
| const filePath = path.resolve(sampleDataPath, file); | ||
| const stats = await fs.stat(filePath); | ||
| if (stats.isFile()) { | ||
| const data = await fs.readFile(filePath, "utf8"); | ||
| const docs = JSON.parse(data); | ||
| console.log( | ||
| `| ${file.padEnd(28)}| ${docs.length.toString().padEnd(15)}|`, | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| console.log(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Handle large or invalid JSON files more robustly.
If a file is very large or contains invalid JSON, the current implementation may throw runtime errors. Consider validating file contents before parsing or catching JSON parse errors explicitly for finer-grained error reporting.
| export async function checkAndInsertData<T>( | ||
| table: PgTable, | ||
| rows: T[], | ||
| conflictTarget: AnyPgColumn | AnyPgColumn[], | ||
| batchSize: number, | ||
| ): Promise<boolean> { | ||
| if (!rows.length) return false; | ||
|
|
||
| for (let i = 0; i < rows.length; i += batchSize) { | ||
| const batch = rows.slice(i, i + batchSize); | ||
| await db | ||
| .insert(table) | ||
| .values(batch) | ||
| .onConflictDoNothing({ | ||
| target: Array.isArray(conflictTarget) | ||
| ? conflictTarget | ||
| : [conflictTarget], | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| return true; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use database transactions for batch inserts.
Inserting data in batches outside a transaction can leave the database in a partially updated state if an error occurs mid-operation. Wrapping checkAndInsertData calls in a transaction can help maintain atomicity.
| export async function main(): Promise<void> { | ||
| const collections = ["users", "organizations", "organization_memberships"]; | ||
|
|
||
| try { | ||
| await pingDB(); | ||
| console.log("\n\x1b[32mSuccess:\x1b[0m Database connected successfully\n"); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| throw new Error(`Database connection failed: ${error}`); | ||
| } | ||
| try { | ||
| await ensureAdministratorExists().then(() => { | ||
| console.log("\x1b[32mSuccess:\x1b[0m Administrator setup complete\n"); | ||
| }); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.error("\nError: Administrator creation failed", error); | ||
| throw new Error( | ||
| "\n\x1b[31mAdministrator access may be lost, try reimporting sample DB to restore access\x1b[0m\n", | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| try { | ||
| await insertCollections(collections); | ||
| console.log("\n\x1b[32mSuccess:\x1b[0m Sample Data added to the database"); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.error("Error: ", error); | ||
| throw new Error("Error adding sample data"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider wrapping the entire flow in a single transaction.
If pingDB, administrator creation, or data insertion fails, rolling back all changes may be preferable to having a half-complete setup. A single transaction can ensure atomicity of the entire process.
| "\x1b[31mRestricted: Resetting the database in production is not allowed\x1b[0m\n", | ||
| ); | ||
| process.exit(0); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Use a non-zero exit code when skipping the reset in production.
Exiting with code 0 may imply success rather than a prohibited operation. A distinct exit code (e.g., 1) can better signal that the reset was intentionally canceled.
| ## Resetting Database | ||
|
|
||
| **NOTE:** This applies only to Talawa API developers. | ||
|
|
||
| Sometimes you may want to start all over again from scratch. These steps ensure all tables emptied and the default administrator account automatically restored. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Using the CLI (Dev Containers) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Enhance Clarity in Database Reset Description
The new "Resetting Database" section clearly warns developers about the destructive nature of the reset operation. To further assist users, consider explicitly stating the expected final state—for example, “all tables will be emptied and the default administrator account will be restored”—so that developers have a precise understanding of the outcome after running these commands.
| ### Using the CLI (Dev Containers) | ||
|
|
||
| This applies to users running Talawa API in dev containers. | ||
|
|
||
| 1. Once the server is running, open a new terminal session. | ||
|
|
||
| 2. Open a bash session inside the running container: | ||
|
|
||
| ```bash | ||
| docker exec -it talawa-api-1 /bin/bash | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| 3. **WARNING:** This command will **DELETE** all data from each table in your database, administrator roles will be restored. Use with extreme caution. | ||
|
|
||
| ```bash | ||
| pnpm run reset:db | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| 4. This command will add sample data to make it easier for developers to get an understanding of the application. | ||
|
|
||
| ```bash | ||
| pnpm run add:sample_data | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| 5. Then exit | ||
|
|
||
| ```bash | ||
| exit | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Review of CLI (Dev Containers) Instructions
The "Using the CLI (Dev Containers)" section is well structured and includes a prominent warning regarding data deletion. Please ensure that each fenced code block (for executing docker exec, pnpm run reset:db, pnpm run add:sample_data, and exit) is surrounded by blank lines in accordance with markdownlint MD031 guidelines. Additionally, consider adding a brief summary line that outlines the expected change in database state after executing these operations.
| ### Using VS Code Dev Container | ||
|
|
||
| This applies to users running Talawa API in dev containers and VSCode. | ||
|
|
||
| 1. **WARNING:** This command will **DELETE** all data from each table in your database, administrator roles will be restored. Use with extreme caution. | ||
| ```bash | ||
| pnpm run reset:db | ||
| ``` | ||
| 2. This command will add sample data to make it easier for developers to get an understanding of the application. | ||
| ```bash | ||
| pnpm run add:sample_data | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Review of VS Code Dev Container Instructions
The instructions in the "Using VS Code Dev Container" section mirror those in the CLI section and provide clear, context-specific guidance. To further enhance consistency and readability, please verify that the fenced code blocks are preceded and followed by blank lines per markdownlint requirements. A minor clarification regarding the restoration process (e.g. how the administrator role is re-assigned) could also prove beneficial.
| ### Using the CLI (Dev Containers) | ||
|
|
||
| This applies to users running Talawa API in dev containers. | ||
|
|
||
| 1. Once the server is running, open a new terminal session. | ||
|
|
||
| 2. Open a bash session inside the running container: | ||
|
|
||
| ```bash | ||
| docker exec -it talawa-api-1 /bin/bash | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| 3. Inside the container, run the following command to import sample data into the database: | ||
|
|
||
| ```bash | ||
| pnpm run import:sample-data | ||
| pnpm run add:sample_data | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| 4. Then exit | ||
|
|
||
| ```bash | ||
| exit | ||
| exit | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| Refer to the next section for login information. | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Review of CLI (Dev Containers) Sample Data Import Instructions
The updated section for importing sample data via the CLI is clear and correctly updates the command from pnpm run import:sample-data to pnpm run add:sample_data. The step-by-step instructions—opening a terminal session, entering the container, executing the data import command, and then exiting—are straightforward. Please ensure that all fenced code blocks have surrounding blank lines to satisfy markdownlint (MD031) guidelines.
| ### Using VS Code Dev Container | ||
|
|
||
| This applies to users running Talawa API in dev containers and VSCode. | ||
|
|
||
| 1. Open a terminal inside the container. | ||
|
|
||
| 2. Run the following command to import sample data into the database: | ||
|
|
||
| ```bash | ||
| pnpm run add:sample_data | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### Sample Data Users | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Review of VS Code Dev Container Instructions for Sample Data Import
The "Using VS Code Dev Container" section provides an equally clear set of instructions for users operating within Visual Studio Code. The guidance aligns with that in the CLI section and the updated command usage is correct. As a minor improvement, verify that the fenced code blocks in this section are also separated by blank lines to maintain consistency with markdown styling best practices.
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Closes #3214
Description
This PR adds a GitHub Action workflow to test the importation of dynamic sample data.
Flow of script
add:sample_data
Proper error catching is implemented for best UX.
reset:db
Key Changes
Implementation Details
Testing details
Testing Instructions
Next Steps
Improve code coverage for scripts.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor
Documentation
Tests