Test for : src/graphql/types/Mutation/deleteComment.ts #3234
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes refactor the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant GraphQLServer
participant Resolver
participant Database
Client->>GraphQLServer: Send deleteComment mutation with args
GraphQLServer->>Resolver: Invoke deleteCommentResolver(_parent, args, ctx)
Resolver->>Database: Query for current user (with additional columns)
alt User not found
Database-->>Resolver: Return undefined
Resolver-->>GraphQLServer: Error (unauthenticated)
else User found
Resolver->>Database: Query for comment (with additional columns)
alt Comment not found or not authorized
Database-->>Resolver: Return undefined or unauthorized error
Resolver-->>GraphQLServer: Error (not found/unauthorized)
else Comment exists and authorized
Resolver->>Database: Delete comment
Database-->>Resolver: Confirm deletion
Resolver-->>GraphQLServer: Return deleted comment data
end
end
GraphQLServer-->>Client: Deliver response (data or error)
sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant GraphQLServer
participant Database
Client->>GraphQLServer: Send query/mutation (tag, CreateTag, or Organization)
GraphQLServer->>Database: Execute corresponding query/mutation with input parameters
Database-->>GraphQLServer: Return requested data (tag, organization, or new tag)
GraphQLServer-->>Client: Return response data
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
iamanishx
changed the title
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3234 +/- ##
====================================================
+ Coverage 45.48% 45.80% +0.32%
====================================================
Files 455 455
Lines 33935 33930 -5
Branches 757 771 +14
====================================================
+ Hits 15435 15543 +108
+ Misses 18496 18383 -113
Partials 4 4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/graphql/types/Mutation/deleteComment.ts(1 hunks)test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts(1 hunks)test/routes/graphql/gql.tada-cache.d.ts(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
src/graphql/types/Mutation/deleteComment.ts (3)
11-11: Type import looks great.Importing
GraphQLContextexplicitly is a good way to ensure type safety across resolvers.
17-133: Ensure defensive checks for existing user ID.The
deleteCommentResolvercovers comprehensive scenarios—authentication, argument validation, user lookup, and comment lookup. This is well-structured. However, consider validating thatctx.currentClient.user.idexists and is a valid UUID earlier, especially if the authenticating mechanism or database can ever return incomplete user data. This helps guard against potential undefined IDs.Would you like to run a quick check across the codebase ensuring no calls to
deleteCommentResolverpass an undefined or improperly formatteduser.id?
135-146: Mutation field registration is consistent.The registration of the
deleteCommentmutation references the newly extracted resolver, maintaining a clear boundary between schema definition and business logic. The use ofMutationDeleteCommentInputfor argument validation aligns neatly with the new resolver approach.test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts (11)
1-4: Good setup for Vitest and typed context imports.This test suite properly imports the necessary frameworks (
vitest, custom GraphQL types) and organizes them from the outset, keeping the test environment consistent and type-safe.
8-36: Mocking approach is well-defined.The
createMockContexthelper offers a flexible way to override parts of theGraphQLContextfor targeted testing. This is a good pattern that promotes reusability and clarity.
132-140: Fake delete chain logic is neatly composed.The chain pattern for
.where()and.returning()is well-implemented for capturing the final array of deleted rows. This is a clean approach to mocking the Drizzle client’s fluent API.
148-157: Test for unauthenticated client is precise.Verifies the
unauthenticatederror thoroughly. Good coverage for an essential security check.
177-198: Test for undefined currentUser.Replicating a scenario where user lookup fails in the DB is a practical approach. This test confirms the code’s resilience to unexpected states.
200-214: Test for non-existent comment ID.Correctly ensures nonexistent comment references trigger the
arguments_associated_resources_not_founderror. Good alignment with the domain’s error code standards.
216-236: Test for unauthorized user.Thoroughly covers the logic when a non-admin attempts to delete another user’s comment without sufficient org privileges. This is crucial for security and role-based access.
238-259: Test for unexpected deletion result.Handles the corner case where
.returning()yields an empty array, highlighting robust error handling for unforeseen outcomes in DB operations.
261-338: Ensures comment query structure is correct.The test thoroughly checks columns in the multi-level “with” chain. This helps confirm the internal usage of Drizzle is accurate and consistent with expectations.
340-366: Checks successful deletion scenario.Verifies a normal, successful path, ensuring the comment is returned after deletion with correct data. These success tests neatly complement the error scenario tests.
369-418: Mutation wiring test.Validates that
deleteCommentis properly wired into the GraphQL schema. This final coverage step ensures the upstream schema references match the newly extracted resolver.
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts (4)
Learnt from: iamanishx
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234
File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:5-7
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T09:38:53.976Z
Learning: In Talawa API, when using PostgreSQL UUID columns (defined as `uuid("id")` in Drizzle schema), additional test cases for invalid UUID formats are not required as the validation is enforced at multiple levels:
1. PostgreSQL's native UUID type validation
2. Drizzle ORM's type system
3. Auto-generated Zod schema through `createInsertSchema`
Learnt from: iamanishx
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234
File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:5-7
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T09:37:54.760Z
Learning: In Talawa API, UUID validation is handled through multiple layers: PostgreSQL's UUID type, Drizzle ORM's type system, and Zod schema validation. When the column is defined as UUID in the database schema (using `uuid()` in Drizzle), additional UUID format testing in the application layer is not necessary as invalid UUIDs will be rejected by the type system.
Learnt from: iamanishx
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234
File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:5-7
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T09:38:53.976Z
Learning: In Talawa API, when the input schema uses UUID validation, additional test cases for invalid UUID formats are not required as the schema validation automatically handles this validation.
Learnt from: iamanishx
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234
File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:55-129
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T09:33:51.904Z
Learning: Test mocks should align with implemented server-side functionality. Avoid adding test cases for features that don't have corresponding server logic, even if the data structure supports them (e.g., pinned posts/comments fields in the mock structure).
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts (2)
368-418: Well-structured schema wiring tests!The schema wiring tests are well-implemented with proper isolation through
resetModules, appropriate spy usage, and thorough validation of the mutation registration.
1-418: Excellent test implementation with comprehensive coverage!The test suite is well-structured with:
- Thorough error scenario coverage
- Clear and reusable helper functions
- Proper type definitions
- Comprehensive schema wiring tests
The implementation demonstrates good testing practices and attention to detail.
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts (1)
9-36: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Consider simplifying the type for
overrides.
Currently, you're usingPartial<Required<GraphQLContext>>. Often,Partial<GraphQLContext>alone may suffice unless there’s a strong reason to force all properties to be recognized as required before partializing them.-function createMockContext( - overrides: Partial<Required<GraphQLContext>> = {}, -): GraphQLContext { +function createMockContext( + overrides: Partial<GraphQLContext> = {}, +): GraphQLContext {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts (5)
Learnt from: iamanishx
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234
File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:142-366
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T11:24:49.748Z
Learning: For test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts, the team prefers a simpler test structure with a single describe block and individual it blocks, rather than nested describe blocks for test organization.
Learnt from: iamanishx
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234
File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:5-7
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T09:38:53.976Z
Learning: In Talawa API, when using PostgreSQL UUID columns (defined as `uuid("id")` in Drizzle schema), additional test cases for invalid UUID formats are not required as the validation is enforced at multiple levels:
1. PostgreSQL's native UUID type validation
2. Drizzle ORM's type system
3. Auto-generated Zod schema through `createInsertSchema`
Learnt from: iamanishx
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234
File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:5-7
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T09:37:54.760Z
Learning: In Talawa API, UUID validation is handled through multiple layers: PostgreSQL's UUID type, Drizzle ORM's type system, and Zod schema validation. When the column is defined as UUID in the database schema (using `uuid()` in Drizzle), additional UUID format testing in the application layer is not necessary as invalid UUIDs will be rejected by the type system.
Learnt from: iamanishx
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234
File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:5-7
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T09:38:53.976Z
Learning: In Talawa API, when the input schema uses UUID validation, additional test cases for invalid UUID formats are not required as the schema validation automatically handles this validation.
Learnt from: iamanishx
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234
File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:55-129
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T09:33:51.904Z
Learning: Test mocks should align with implemented server-side functionality. Avoid adding test cases for features that don't have corresponding server logic, even if the data structure supports them (e.g., pinned posts/comments fields in the mock structure).
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts (7)
1-4: Good structure and explicit imports.
The imports from "vitest" and the direct resolver import are clear and maintain a cohesive testing workflow.
5-7: Appropriate use of placeholders for valid UUID and arguments.
DefiningvalidUuidandvalidArgsat the top reduces repeated declaration within tests. This is clean and helps maintain consistency across all relevant test cases.
38-54: Mocking the users table looks good.
The helper functionmockUsersTableFindFirstclearly sets up defaults and accepts overrides. This is an effective way to keep test code DRY and flexible.
55-129: Interfaces for nested configurations are well-defined.
DefiningCommentsFindFirstConfig,Comment, andExtendedCommentclarifies the shape of query responses. This thorough approach ensures your mocks accurately reflect expected data structures.
131-141: Helper for fake delete chains is straightforward.
Creating a structured “where → returning” mock closely parallels the actual drizzle-like chain. This design keeps the test logic realistic without overly complicating the code.
142-366: Thorough coverage of error and success scenarios.
All critical error conditions (unauthenticated, invalid arguments, unauthorized, resource not found, unexpected) and a successful deletion path are tested. This approach maximizes confidence in thedeleteCommentResolver’s reliability.
368-417: Schema wiring test effectively ensures correct registration.
Spying onmutationFieldand verifying the resolver, description, and arguments helps safeguard that the GraphQL schema is integrated properly. This seconddescribeblock is logically separate and well justified.
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts (5)
Learnt from: iamanishx
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234
File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:142-366
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T11:24:49.748Z
Learning: For test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts, the team prefers a simpler test structure with a single describe block and individual it blocks, rather than nested describe blocks for test organization.
Learnt from: iamanishx
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234
File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:5-7
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T09:38:53.976Z
Learning: In Talawa API, when using PostgreSQL UUID columns (defined as `uuid("id")` in Drizzle schema), additional test cases for invalid UUID formats are not required as the validation is enforced at multiple levels:
1. PostgreSQL's native UUID type validation
2. Drizzle ORM's type system
3. Auto-generated Zod schema through `createInsertSchema`
Learnt from: iamanishx
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234
File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:5-7
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T09:37:54.760Z
Learning: In Talawa API, UUID validation is handled through multiple layers: PostgreSQL's UUID type, Drizzle ORM's type system, and Zod schema validation. When the column is defined as UUID in the database schema (using `uuid()` in Drizzle), additional UUID format testing in the application layer is not necessary as invalid UUIDs will be rejected by the type system.
Learnt from: iamanishx
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234
File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:5-7
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T09:38:53.976Z
Learning: In Talawa API, when the input schema uses UUID validation, additional test cases for invalid UUID formats are not required as the schema validation automatically handles this validation.
Learnt from: iamanishx
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234
File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:55-129
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T09:33:51.904Z
Learning: Test mocks should align with implemented server-side functionality. Avoid adding test cases for features that don't have corresponding server logic, even if the data structure supports them (e.g., pinned posts/comments fields in the mock structure).
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts (2)
1-7: LGTM! Well-structured imports and constants.The imports are organized logically, and the UUID constant is defined appropriately for testing purposes.
1-416: Overall excellent test implementation!The test suite is comprehensive, well-structured, and follows team preferences. It effectively covers:
- Error scenarios
- Authorization checks
- Success cases
- Schema wiring
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts (6)
Learnt from: iamanishx
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234
File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:142-364
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T11:47:49.383Z
Learning: Vitest's TypeScript types for expect().toEqual() only accept one argument, unlike Jest. Don't suggest adding custom error messages as a second argument to Vitest assertions.
Learnt from: iamanishx
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234
File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:142-366
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T11:24:49.748Z
Learning: For test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts, the team prefers a simpler test structure with a single describe block and individual it blocks, rather than nested describe blocks for test organization.
Learnt from: iamanishx
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234
File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:5-7
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T09:38:53.976Z
Learning: In Talawa API, when using PostgreSQL UUID columns (defined as `uuid("id")` in Drizzle schema), additional test cases for invalid UUID formats are not required as the validation is enforced at multiple levels:
1. PostgreSQL's native UUID type validation
2. Drizzle ORM's type system
3. Auto-generated Zod schema through `createInsertSchema`
Learnt from: iamanishx
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234
File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:5-7
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T09:37:54.760Z
Learning: In Talawa API, UUID validation is handled through multiple layers: PostgreSQL's UUID type, Drizzle ORM's type system, and Zod schema validation. When the column is defined as UUID in the database schema (using `uuid()` in Drizzle), additional UUID format testing in the application layer is not necessary as invalid UUIDs will be rejected by the type system.
Learnt from: iamanishx
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234
File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:5-7
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T09:38:53.976Z
Learning: In Talawa API, when the input schema uses UUID validation, additional test cases for invalid UUID formats are not required as the schema validation automatically handles this validation.
Learnt from: iamanishx
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234
File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:55-129
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T09:33:51.904Z
Learning: Test mocks should align with implemented server-side functionality. Avoid adding test cases for features that don't have corresponding server logic, even if the data structure supports them (e.g., pinned posts/comments fields in the mock structure).
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts (2)
1-145: Well-structured helper functions with strong typing!The helper functions are well-organized, properly documented with JSDoc comments, and use TypeScript types effectively. The mock context creation is comprehensive and type-safe.
370-420: Robust schema wiring tests with proper isolation!The schema wiring tests effectively verify the mutation registration with:
- Proper module mocking and cleanup
- Type-safe callback verification
- Comprehensive field configuration checks
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
|
@palisadoes rabbit ai has approved the changes but the test is failing |
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
|
It looks like you have removed support for pinned posts. They are always at the top of a feed and horizontally scrollable like Instagram stories. Please restore this functionality |
|
@palisadoes sir Sorry for Inconvenience happend i am having some hard time to understand what you said |
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts (6)
Learnt from: iamanishx
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234
File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:142-364
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T11:47:49.383Z
Learning: Vitest's TypeScript types for expect().toEqual() only accept one argument, unlike Jest. Don't suggest adding custom error messages as a second argument to Vitest assertions.
Learnt from: iamanishx
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234
File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:142-366
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T11:24:49.748Z
Learning: For test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts, the team prefers a simpler test structure with a single describe block and individual it blocks, rather than nested describe blocks for test organization.
Learnt from: iamanishx
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234
File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:5-7
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T09:38:53.976Z
Learning: In Talawa API, when using PostgreSQL UUID columns (defined as `uuid("id")` in Drizzle schema), additional test cases for invalid UUID formats are not required as the validation is enforced at multiple levels:
1. PostgreSQL's native UUID type validation
2. Drizzle ORM's type system
3. Auto-generated Zod schema through `createInsertSchema`
Learnt from: iamanishx
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234
File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:5-7
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T09:37:54.760Z
Learning: In Talawa API, UUID validation is handled through multiple layers: PostgreSQL's UUID type, Drizzle ORM's type system, and Zod schema validation. When the column is defined as UUID in the database schema (using `uuid()` in Drizzle), additional UUID format testing in the application layer is not necessary as invalid UUIDs will be rejected by the type system.
Learnt from: iamanishx
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234
File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:5-7
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T09:38:53.976Z
Learning: In Talawa API, when the input schema uses UUID validation, additional test cases for invalid UUID formats are not required as the schema validation automatically handles this validation.
Learnt from: iamanishx
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234
File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:55-129
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T09:33:51.904Z
Learning: Test mocks should align with implemented server-side functionality. Avoid adding test cases for features that don't have corresponding server logic, even if the data structure supports them (e.g., pinned posts/comments fields in the mock structure).
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts (2)
1-143: LGTM! Well-structured helper functions and interfaces.The helper functions and interfaces are well-implemented with:
- Clear JSDoc documentation
- Strong type safety through TypeScript interfaces
- Comprehensive mock functions for test isolation
145-367: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Consider adding test cases for edge scenarios.
The test suite is comprehensive, covering authentication, authorization, and basic error cases. Consider adding test cases for:
- Concurrent deletion attempts
- Network timeouts or database connection issues
- Partial failures during transaction
⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: iamanishx PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3234 File: test/routes/graphql/Mutation/deletecomment.test.ts:55-129 Timestamp: 2025-02-17T09:33:51.904Z Learning: Test mocks should align with implemented server-side functionality. Avoid adding test cases for features that don't have corresponding server logic, even if the data structure supports them (e.g., pinned posts/comments fields in the mock structure).
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
|
@palisadoes please review |
|
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Issue Number: #3017
Fixes #
Snapshots/Videos:
N/A
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Summary by CodeRabbit