-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: add possibility to define dicts w/o values in checks and report #101
fix: add possibility to define dicts w/o values in checks and report #101
Conversation
☂️ Python Coverage
Overall Coverage
New FilesNo new covered files... Modified Files
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me, just the coverage.xml need to be removed.
82f140c
to
3773da3
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we can merge this.
Description
Add flexibility to define a check or report state with
key: None
format, which equals YAML'skey:
Motivation and Context
see description in #100
How Has This Been Tested?
Existing python code was checked (Examples)
Screenshots (if appropriate)
Types of changes
Checklist