You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think it makes no sense to have a no_factor option on the monotone tree verification strategy. In fact in the current state the enumeration algorithm won't say a tiling is verified if it has more than one factor. I think if we have a monotone "forest" we should let the local verification handle that.
If we agree on that then the pack for this strategy should be focused on pulling out monotone leaves using interleaving factor.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Now interleaving factors has the enumeration code implemented, we should be able to create a strategy pack that always finds a specification for such Tilings. We should also consider how to write down equations for whatever pack is made.
I think it makes no sense to have a
no_factor
option on the monotone tree verification strategy. In fact in the current state the enumeration algorithm won't say a tiling is verified if it has more than one factor. I think if we have a monotone "forest" we should let the local verification handle that.If we agree on that then the pack for this strategy should be focused on pulling out monotone leaves using interleaving factor.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: