Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set a pleasant-looking name for SMS 2FA #33

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2024
Merged

Conversation

bickelj
Copy link
Contributor

@bickelj bickelj commented Mar 5, 2024

When the SMS second-factor authentication provider is shown in a list, this commit makes the name look nicer, at least in English.

Issue #19

@bickelj
Copy link
Contributor Author

bickelj commented Mar 5, 2024

@reefdog @slifty @hminsky2002 I don't mean all y'all should review but whoever feels like it is welcome.

Copy link
Member

@slifty slifty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hooray!

I admit... I don't have a working local keycloak, so this is purely a code / language review, but I also saw that this is in place on the test server and it seems correct.

(I will go set up a working keycloak now though, just for kicks)

@bickelj
Copy link
Contributor Author

bickelj commented Mar 13, 2024

@slifty FWIW I admit that I gave up on trying this in my local Keycloak and relied on the test environment to try this change.

When the SMS second-factor authentication provider is shown in a list,
this commit makes the name look nicer, at least in English.

Issue #19
@bickelj bickelj force-pushed the pleasant-name-for-sms branch from 29ea538 to 54eab58 Compare March 13, 2024 17:01
@bickelj
Copy link
Contributor Author

bickelj commented Mar 13, 2024

As is our custom, I will carry the approval to the next commit given that we trust one another to resolve the given issue.

@bickelj bickelj merged commit 05793e4 into main Mar 13, 2024
2 checks passed
@bickelj bickelj deleted the pleasant-name-for-sms branch March 13, 2024 17:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants