Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Subprocess handling within QRMs #60

Closed
wederbn opened this issue Jun 3, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #61
Closed

Subprocess handling within QRMs #60

wederbn opened this issue Jun 3, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #61
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@wederbn
Copy link
Collaborator

wederbn commented Jun 3, 2023

Current Behavior:
When a replacement of a QRM contains a subprocess it should be inserted in the same form, i.e., collapsed or expanded.
However, currently, all subprocesses are expanded independent of the form within the replacement.

Expected Behavior:
The replacement should be analyzed and the inserted subprocess should only be expanded if its also expanded within the replacement.

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Create a QRM comprising a collapsed subprocess
  2. Use this QRM to replace a QuantME task --> the subprocess is expanded

Other Information:
See here.

@wederbn wederbn added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 3, 2023
@LaviniaStiliadou LaviniaStiliadou linked a pull request Jun 4, 2023 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants