Fix/subprocess handling with QRM #61
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
wederbn
requested changes
Jun 15, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fails for me with the following error message when transforming this workflow:
I think this workflow would be a nice test case, as it combines multiple features of the modeler.
Then, one of the asserts could validate that isExpanded is set correctly
…nto fix/subprocess-handling
…nto fix/subprocess-handling
wederbn
approved these changes
Aug 25, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Short Description
As described in the issue, when a replacement of a QRM contains subprocesses, all subprocesses are expanded independent of the form within the replacement.
Proposed Changes