-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove old _optimize
method and the test
#1066
Conversation
_optimize
method and the test
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1066 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 94.96% 94.86% -0.10%
==========================================
Files 87 87
Lines 21776 21711 -65
==========================================
- Hits 20680 20597 -83
- Misses 1096 1114 +18
|
| benchmark_name | dt(%) | dt(s) | t_new(s) | t_old(s) |
| -------------------------------------- | ---------------------- | ---------------------- | ---------------------- | ---------------------- |
test_build_transform_fft_lowres | +3.77 +/- 4.37 | +1.98e-02 +/- 2.30e-02 | 5.46e-01 +/- 2.0e-02 | 5.26e-01 +/- 1.2e-02 |
test_build_transform_fft_midres | +6.59 +/- 3.19 | +3.96e-02 +/- 1.92e-02 | 6.40e-01 +/- 1.7e-02 | 6.01e-01 +/- 9.1e-03 |
test_build_transform_fft_highres | +3.49 +/- 4.39 | +3.49e-02 +/- 4.38e-02 | 1.03e+00 +/- 3.1e-02 | 9.99e-01 +/- 3.1e-02 |
test_equilibrium_init_lowres | +6.97 +/- 3.01 | +2.65e-01 +/- 1.15e-01 | 4.07e+00 +/- 1.1e-01 | 3.81e+00 +/- 1.3e-02 |
test_equilibrium_init_medres | +8.20 +/- 3.45 | +3.48e-01 +/- 1.46e-01 | 4.59e+00 +/- 1.4e-01 | 4.24e+00 +/- 4.6e-02 |
-test_equilibrium_init_highres | +5.94 +/- 1.84 | +3.39e-01 +/- 1.05e-01 | 6.05e+00 +/- 1.0e-01 | 5.71e+00 +/- 2.7e-02 |
test_objective_compile_dshape_current | +2.55 +/- 1.72 | +9.86e-02 +/- 6.66e-02 | 3.96e+00 +/- 6.3e-02 | 3.86e+00 +/- 2.2e-02 |
test_objective_compile_atf | +1.59 +/- 2.19 | +1.32e-01 +/- 1.82e-01 | 8.40e+00 +/- 1.7e-01 | 8.27e+00 +/- 7.3e-02 |
test_objective_compute_dshape_current | +5.10 +/- 3.81 | +5.82e-05 +/- 4.35e-05 | 1.20e-03 +/- 3.0e-05 | 1.14e-03 +/- 3.2e-05 |
test_objective_compute_atf | +4.65 +/- 6.63 | +1.87e-04 +/- 2.66e-04 | 4.21e-03 +/- 2.1e-04 | 4.02e-03 +/- 1.6e-04 |
test_objective_jac_dshape_current | +7.49 +/- 7.90 | +2.73e-03 +/- 2.88e-03 | 3.91e-02 +/- 2.1e-03 | 3.64e-02 +/- 2.0e-03 |
test_objective_jac_atf | -1.84 +/- 2.33 | -3.46e-02 +/- 4.39e-02 | 1.85e+00 +/- 2.5e-02 | 1.89e+00 +/- 3.6e-02 |
test_perturb_1 | +0.98 +/- 1.42 | +1.30e-01 +/- 1.87e-01 | 1.33e+01 +/- 1.8e-01 | 1.32e+01 +/- 4.5e-02 |
test_perturb_2 | +0.26 +/- 1.47 | +4.69e-02 +/- 2.67e-01 | 1.82e+01 +/- 2.1e-01 | 1.81e+01 +/- 1.6e-01 |
test_proximal_jac_atf | -0.45 +/- 1.06 | -3.28e-02 +/- 7.78e-02 | 7.31e+00 +/- 5.6e-02 | 7.34e+00 +/- 5.4e-02 |
test_proximal_freeb_compute | -0.96 +/- 0.63 | -1.70e-03 +/- 1.11e-03 | 1.76e-01 +/- 7.3e-04 | 1.77e-01 +/- 8.4e-04 |
test_proximal_freeb_jac | -0.00 +/- 1.04 | -3.25e-04 +/- 7.65e-02 | 7.33e+00 +/- 5.0e-02 | 7.33e+00 +/- 5.8e-02 |
test_solve_fixed_iter | +0.25 +/- 7.42 | +3.60e-02 +/- 1.09e+00 | 1.47e+01 +/- 7.8e-01 | 1.46e+01 +/- 7.6e-01 | |
It's fine for this PR because I would have approved it, but remember that in general our unofficial policy is to get 2 approvals before merging. More eyes help catch things that one person misses. |
Oh sorry, I thought one approval is fine in general. Also we have already talked about this during meeting, that's why I just merged it in. |
No description provided.