Skip to content

Conversation

@edwinyjlim
Copy link
Member

Automated wizard CI run

Source: local
Trigger ID: ceefcf5
App: flask/flask3-social-media
App directory: apps/flask/flask3-social-media
Workbench branch: wizard-ci-ceefcf5-flask-flask3-social-media
Wizard branch: main
Examples branch: main
PostHog (MCP) branch: master
Timestamp: 2026-01-20T22:47:58.108Z
Duration: 472.8s

@edwinyjlim
Copy link
Member Author

Now I have a complete picture. Let me provide the PR evaluation report:


PR Evaluation Report

Summary

This PR integrates PostHog analytics into a Flask 3 social media (microblog) application. It adds comprehensive server-side event tracking across authentication flows, user engagement actions, and API endpoints using the PostHog Python SDK v3+ context-based API. The integration includes exception capture via a global error handler.

Files changed Lines added Lines removed
8 +239 -5

Confidence score: 2/5 ❌

  • Global error handler breaks existing error pages: The new @app.errorhandler(Exception) handler catches ALL exceptions and returns JSON responses only, completely overriding the existing HTML error pages (404.html, 500.html) that the app already has. This breaks the web UI error handling. [CRITICAL]
  • Missing page view tracking: No `` event tracking is implemented for this server-rendered Flask application. For a server-rendered app, page views should be captured on each route hit. [MEDIUM]
  • No reverse proxy configured: The integration does not include a reverse proxy configuration to circumvent ad blockers when sending events to PostHog. [MEDIUM]

File changes

Filename Score Description
app/__init__.py 2/5 Adds PostHog initialization and global exception handler. The exception handler is problematic - it returns JSON for all errors, breaking existing HTML error pages.
app/api/tokens.py 4/5 Adds api_token_generated event capture with proper context-based API usage. Missing event for token revocation.
app/api/users.py 4/5 Adds api_user_created event with user properties. Correct implementation using tag() for user identification. Missing API user update event.
app/auth/routes.py 4/5 Comprehensive auth event tracking: login, logout, signup, password reset. Well-structured with proper user identification.
app/main/routes.py 4/5 Good coverage of user engagement events: posts, follows, messages, search, exports. Missing explore page and notifications tracking.
config.py 5/5 Clean PostHog configuration with environment variables and sensible defaults.
requirements.txt 5/5 Correctly adds posthog>=3.0.0 dependency.
posthog-setup-report.md 4/5 Useful documentation but contains hardcoded API key which should not be committed.

App sanity check: 2/5 ❌

Criteria Result Description
App builds and runs Partial App will run but error handling is broken for web users
Preserves existing env vars & configs Yes Existing configuration preserved, new PostHog vars added cleanly
No syntax or type errors Yes Code is syntactically correct
Correct imports/exports Yes All imports are valid and properly structured
Minimal, focused changes No Global error handler is overly broad and changes app behavior

Issues

  • Global error handler overrides existing error pages: The new @app.errorhandler(Exception) in app/__init__.py catches all exceptions and returns JSON responses only. The app already has proper error handlers in app/errors/handlers.py that render HTML templates (404.html, 500.html) for web requests and JSON for API requests using wants_json_response(). The new handler completely bypasses this logic, breaking the web UI's error experience. Users will see raw JSON instead of styled error pages. [CRITICAL]
  • Database session not rolled back on 500 errors: The existing internal_error handler calls db.session.rollback() to handle transaction cleanup. The new global handler doesn't do this, potentially leaving the database session in an inconsistent state after errors. [CRITICAL]
  • Hardcoded API key in documentation: The posthog-setup-report.md file contains what appears to be a real API key (sTMFPsFhdP1Ssg). This should not be committed to version control. [MEDIUM]

Other completed criteria

  • Preserves existing blueprint registrations
  • Preserves existing Flask extensions initialization order
  • PostHog checks are properly guarded with config flags
  • No unnecessary file modifications

PostHog implementation: 3/5 ⚠️

Criteria Result Description
PostHog SDKs installed Yes posthog>=3.0.0 added to requirements.txt
PostHog client initialized Yes Initialized in create_app() with api_key, host, and debug settings
capture() Yes 14 distinct events captured across auth, main routes, and API
identify() Yes Uses identify_context() within new_context() blocks correctly for Python SDK v7+
Error tracking Partial posthog.capture_exception(e) implemented but handler approach is flawed
Reverse proxy No No reverse proxy configuration to avoid ad blockers

Issues

  • Exception capture breaks existing error handling flow: While capture_exception() is used correctly, the surrounding error handler completely changes app behavior. A better approach would be to integrate PostHog exception capture into the existing error handlers in app/errors/handlers.py rather than creating a new global handler. [CRITICAL]
  • No page view tracking: For a server-rendered Flask app, page views should be tracked. This could be done via a @app.before_request hook that captures page views, or by adding capture calls to individual routes. [MEDIUM]
  • No reverse proxy setup: Production deployments should use a reverse proxy to avoid ad blockers. Consider documenting nginx/server configuration for proxying PostHog requests. [MEDIUM]
  • Missing token revocation tracking: revoke_token() in tokens.py doesn't capture an event. [LOW]

Other completed criteria

  • API key loaded from environment variable, not hardcoded in code
  • Correct API host configuration (https://us.i.posthog.com)
  • POSTHOG_DISABLED flag allows disabling tracking
  • Debug mode tied to Flask app debug setting
  • Proper use of new_context() and identify_context() pattern for Python SDK v7+
  • User properties tagged appropriately (email, username)
  • No PII in event properties (IDs are stringified)

PostHog insights and events: 4/5 ✅

Filename PostHog events Description
app/__init__.py capturedException Global exception capture for error tracking
app/auth/routes.py user_signed_up, user_logged_in, user_logged_out, password_reset_requested, password_reset_completed Complete authentication lifecycle tracking
app/main/routes.py post_created, profile_updated, user_followed, user_unfollowed, search_performed, message_sent, posts_exported Core user engagement events with useful properties
app/api/users.py api_user_created API signup tracking with signup_method: api property
app/api/tokens.py api_token_generated API authentication token generation tracking

Issues

  • Missing failed login tracking: No event for failed login attempts, which is valuable for security monitoring and understanding friction. [MEDIUM]
  • Missing explore/notifications tracking: The explore() and notifications() routes don't capture events, missing out on understanding content discovery patterns. [LOW]

Other completed criteria

  • Events represent real user actions (signups, logins, content creation, social interactions)
  • Events can build useful funnels (signup → first post)
  • Events enriched with relevant properties (post_length, language, results_count, recipient_id)
  • Event naming is consistent and follows verb_noun pattern
  • API vs form signup differentiated via signup_method property
  • Search events include query metadata without exposing query content (privacy-conscious)

Reviewed by wizard workbench PR evaluator

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants