Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make project's relationship with Qiskit consistent in the copyright headers #646

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 20, 2024

Conversation

garrison
Copy link
Member

Most CKT copyright headers say "This code is a Qiskit project." ... but a few stragglers say "This code is part of Qiskit." This PR updates those stragglers.

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 10016453213

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 100.0%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 10007305226: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 2410
Relevant Lines: 2410

💛 - Coveralls

@garrison garrison changed the title Make copyright headers consistent with respect to Qiskit Make project's relationship with Qiskit consistent in the copyright headers Jul 20, 2024
@garrison garrison added the stable backport potential Suitable to be backported to most recent stable branch by Mergify label Aug 20, 2024
@garrison garrison merged commit ce3ac00 into main Aug 20, 2024
11 checks passed
@garrison garrison deleted the copyright-headers branch August 20, 2024 20:12
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2024
garrison added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2024
(cherry picked from commit ce3ac00)

Co-authored-by: Jim Garrison <garrison@ibm.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
stable backport potential Suitable to be backported to most recent stable branch by Mergify
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants