This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 14, 2025. It is now read-only.
Update to Configuration Version 9#167
Open
KaceCottam wants to merge 1 commit intoQodotPlugin:mainfrom
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thanks for contributing! Help us understand your pull request by explaining:
What does this PR change?
Updates the export schema to address the latest version of TrenchBroom.
According to: the manual for TrenchBroom 2025.3, the only change from configuration version 8->9 is: "Adapt to terminology change: texture renamed to material".
Modified README to include the latest TrenchBroom version as well as modified template strings in <addons/qodot/src/resources/game-definitions/trenchbroom_game_config.gd>, to change instances of "texture" to "material", or "textures" to "materials".
Does this pull request address an existing issue?
#163