Skip to content

Conversation

@jhonabreul
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Use proper extended dictionary types for public properties so that Python helper methods are visible for syntax check and autocompletion

Related Issue

Spin off #9096

Motivation and Context

Requires Documentation Change

How Has This Been Tested?

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Refactor (non-breaking change which improves implementation)
  • Performance (non-breaking change which improves performance. Please add associated performance test and results)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Non-functional change (xml comments/documentation/etc)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.
  • My branch follows the naming convention bug-<issue#>-<description> or feature-<issue#>-<description>

Copy link
Member

@Martin-Molinero Martin-Molinero left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you

@Martin-Molinero Martin-Molinero merged commit bc646c9 into QuantConnect:master Dec 9, 2025
8 of 9 checks passed
@jhonabreul jhonabreul deleted the bug-python-syntax-for-extended-dictionaries branch December 9, 2025 16:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants