refactor: Use f-string instead of .format()
#32
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
GeckoEidechse
force-pushed
the
refactor/f-string
branch
from
7a050f1
to
766829d
Compare
|
Setting back to draft while I get other stuff worked out first ^^ |
It's nicer to read and as such also recommended to use over `.format()`
GeckoEidechse
force-pushed
the
refactor/f-string
branch
from
766829d
to
f85404b
Compare
|
Rebased and updated |
Alystrasz
approved these changes
Jan 30, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
META PR, NO MOD VERIFICATION NEEDED
F-strings are generally nicer to read and as such recommended to use over
.format().Apparently they are also faster but that's not really a concern for us, lol