Skip to content

Conversation

@Badlapje
Copy link

Prior to this change several of the maps had multiple noop/none values. One "noop/none" value per map is more than sufficient.

This change ensures all extra noop/none values are removed.

For our own package, we need a name.
When trying to install dependencies, we run in to a yarn error "incorrect integrity when fetching from cache".

After looking what might cause the error, i found this github thread: yarnpkg/yarn#7584

yarnpkg/yarn#7584 (comment) gives a temporary fix.  Though it's clearly not that temporary, as a permanent fix is still not present in yarn v2.
Prior to this change several of the maps had multiple noop/none values. One "noop/none" value per map is more than sufficient.

This change ensures all extra noop/none values are removed.
@Badlapje
Copy link
Author

@RobertBroersma Not sure why there are multiple none versions for several of the possible attributes, but this ought to fix it.

@RobertBroersma
Copy link
Owner

@Badlapje The extra noop values are there to prevent a disproportionate amount of facial hair and hats in randomly generated characters.

I know it's not pretty, but it works :-)

@Badlapje
Copy link
Author

ah, if that's the idea, i can solve the visual without affecting the random generation, just a sec

@Badlapje
Copy link
Author

@RobertBroersma fixed it by adding a new object for the random generation, is this acceptable?

@RobertBroersma
Copy link
Owner

@Badlapje Idk, it's kind of swapping out 1 bad hack for another slightly better hack. I guess this is fine, but I'll have to find some time to boot up this project, it's been a while.

May I ask why you need this fix?

@Badlapje
Copy link
Author

I'm incorporating the bigheads as user avatars atm & i don't want to show several none values in the dropdown for facialHair and hats. I could just not use the hatMap and facialHairMap, but given that they are there it seems more logical to use them, in case some valid value changes down the road.

You can see it on your own site: the dropdown is confusing for users atm

afbeelding

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants