Update for libsepol 3.6 #113
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In libsepol 3.6 the member name holding the value of the struct `cond_expr_t` has been changed from `bool` to `boolean`. Check on the availability macro to support building against older and newer libsepol versions. Fixes: #110 Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com>
|
/cc @bachradsusi |
pebenito
approved these changes
Dec 6, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In libsepol 3.6 the member name holding the value of the struct
cond_expr_thas been changed frombooltoboolean.Check on the availability macro to support building against older and newer libsepol versions.
Fixes: #110