Add JET.jl static analysis tests #57
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Add JET.jl as a test dependency - Create test/jet.jl with JET.report_package analysis - Test filters expected "no matching method" reports for init stub (this is expected behavior for an interface package) - Update test/runtests.jl to include JET tests 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
test/jet.jlwithJET.report_packageanalysisinitstub (this is expected behavior for an interface package whereinitis a stub meant to be extended)test/runtests.jlto include JET testsAnalysis
CommonSolve.jl is an interface package with function stubs (
init,solve!,step!) and a defaultsolveimplementation. JET correctly identifies that callingsolve()without concrete implementations ofinitwould fail at runtime, but this is expected - downstream packages provide the actual implementations.The test verifies that no unexpected static analysis issues exist while allowing the expected "no matching method for init" reports.
Test plan
Pkg.test()passes locally with the new JET testscc @ChrisRackauckas
🤖 Generated with Claude Code