Skip to content

[BOUNTY] Cross-Node Database Sync Validator (#40)#64

Closed
TheFrogEcliptia wants to merge 1 commit intoScottcjn:mainfrom
TheFrogEcliptia:bounty-40-sync-validator
Closed

[BOUNTY] Cross-Node Database Sync Validator (#40)#64
TheFrogEcliptia wants to merge 1 commit intoScottcjn:mainfrom
TheFrogEcliptia:bounty-40-sync-validator

Conversation

@TheFrogEcliptia
Copy link

@TheFrogEcliptia TheFrogEcliptia commented Feb 10, 2026

[BOUNTY] Cross-Node Database Sync Validator (#40)

Diagnostic tool to ensure consensus and security among attestation nodes.

Features:

  • Compares epoch state and miner lists across the 3 network nodes.
  • Detects security anomalies (e.g., invalid multipliers > 2.5x).
  • Identifies 'split-brain' scenarios or data desynchronization.

Closes #40

clawpatrabot pushed a commit to clawpatrabot/Rustchain that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2026
- Complete async daemon for BoTTube content creator rewards
- Ed25519 cryptographic transaction signing
- Anti-abuse protections (account age, video history, rate limiting)
- RustChain network integration with automatic retry
- Prometheus metrics for monitoring
- Systemd service file for production deployment
- Comprehensive deployment and API documentation
- Full error handling and logging
@Scottcjn
Copy link
Owner

Closing for now: tool submission lacks complete acceptance-proof package for active bounty criteria.

Please keep participating. To be payout-eligible on resubmission:

  1. Map directly to an active bounty issue and claim in that thread
  2. Submit focused, non-duplicate changes
  3. Include working proof (logs/screenshots/test notes)
  4. Keep PR merge-ready (clean diff, no encoding regressions, no placeholder code)

Good active options right now: #99 (challenge), #100 (discovery), #102 (capability), #103 (social), #124 (profile micro-bounty).

@Scottcjn Scottcjn closed this Feb 12, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants