Update HighPurity ID to be a pass-through for displaced tracks

[VourMa]

As per title. The T5 build track collections have been replaced in the configuration by their equivalent high purity track collections, so the configuration is fully working.

There are 3 procModifier combinations that are affected by this change:

1. trackingLST (all plots)

2. singleIterPatatrack,trackingLST (all plots)

3. trackingLST,seedingLST (all plots)

I am not sure I fully understand the small differences, given that both tries were on CPU, but I would be OK to take them, since the overall picture remains unchanged.

[VourMa]

/run all
/run gpu-all

[github-actions]

The PR was built and ran successfully in standalone mode on GPU. Here are some of the comparison plots.

The full set of validation and comparison plots can be found here.

Here is a timing comparison:

   Evt    Hits       MD       LS      T3       T5       pLS       pT5      pT3      TC       Reset    Event     Short             Rate
[target branch]
   avg     15.1      0.4      0.4      0.5      0.6      0.3      0.6      0.3      0.9      0.0      19.2       3.8+/-  0.8      19.2   explicit[s=1]
   avg      0.9      0.6      0.6      0.7      0.8      0.3      1.0      0.4      1.2      0.0       6.6       5.4+/-  1.1       3.3   explicit[s=2]
   avg      1.4      0.9      1.0      1.2      1.3      0.4      1.5      0.7      1.9      0.0      10.3       8.5+/-  1.8       2.6   explicit[s=4]
   avg      2.1      1.3      1.5      1.7      1.8      0.6      2.1      0.9      2.6      0.0      14.5      11.9+/-  2.4       2.5   explicit[s=6]
   avg      2.8      1.7      2.0      2.3      2.5      0.8      2.8      1.2      3.2      0.0      19.3      15.8+/-  3.8       5.0   explicit[s=8]
[this PR]
   avg     15.1      0.4      0.4      0.5      0.6      0.3      0.6      0.3      0.9      0.0      19.2       3.8+/-  0.8      19.3   explicit[s=1]
   avg      0.8      0.5      0.6      0.7      0.8      0.3      1.0      0.5      1.2      0.0       6.5       5.3+/-  1.1       3.3   explicit[s=2]
   avg      1.4      0.8      1.0      1.2      1.3      0.4      1.6      0.7      2.0      0.0      10.4       8.5+/-  1.9       2.6   explicit[s=4]
   avg      2.2      1.3      1.5      1.7      1.8      0.6      2.1      0.9      2.6      0.0      14.7      11.9+/-  2.7       2.5   explicit[s=6]
   avg      2.7      1.6      1.9      2.3      2.5      0.7      2.8      1.2      3.3      0.0      19.2      15.7+/-  3.9       2.5   explicit[s=8]

[github-actions]

The PR was built and ran successfully in standalone mode. Here are some of the comparison plots.

The full set of validation and comparison plots can be found here.

Here is a timing comparison:

   Evt    Hits       MD       LS      T3       T5       pLS       pT5      pT3      TC       Reset    Event     Short             Rate
   avg     29.3    371.5    273.6    124.0     47.0    686.9    124.0    129.1    168.4      1.5    1955.2    1239.0+/- 288.4     605.3   explicit[s=4] (target branch)
   avg     28.6    367.8    272.0    122.1     46.4    687.7    122.2    128.1    167.2      1.4    1943.4    1227.1+/- 290.6     606.5   explicit[s=4] (this PR)

[github-actions]

The PR was built and ran successfully with CMSSW on GPU. Here are some plots.

OOTB All Tracks

The full set of validation and comparison plots can be found here.

[github-actions]

The PR was built and ran successfully with CMSSW. Here are some plots.

OOTB All Tracks

The full set of validation and comparison plots can be found here.

[slava77]

should this be closed as superseded by #208 ?

[VourMa]

should this be closed as superseded by #208 ?

I am waiting to see when/how #208 converges, so I am keeping this one open for now. But yes, it can be ignored for now.

[VourMa]

Superseded by #208