Skip to content

Conversation

@ivanhercaz
Copy link
Contributor

@kghbln, after read some posts in StackOverflow I have two theories:

  1. Maybe something in the cascade-hierarchy is overlapping the media query, but this is strange because the priority is always the last specification, as we have in the code: first the default and then the media query.
  2. Maybe is necessary to use another rule to specify the min-width.

I made the change based on the second theory. Could you use this code to check if it works fine without !important? Note that you have to remove the left and right from .dropdown-content, to be just in media queries.

For the user manual, if tomorrow I have a bit of time to dedicate to it, I will make it.

@kghbln
Copy link
Member

kghbln commented Mar 13, 2018

@ivanhercaz Thanks for your pulls! I am currently sick so I will not be able to deal with them immediately. Hope to do this on Saturday.

@ivanhercaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

ivanhercaz commented Mar 13, 2018

You're welcome, Karsten! I hope you recover soon, but please, make a backup of you, because we need you!

What you need is to stay some time in the Canary Islands, there is many cold in Germany ☔ ❄️

Enviado desde mi Redmi 4X usando FastHub-Libre

right: 0;
}
}

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ivanhercaz Here we have conflicting code for the same media definition. I do not think this will work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants