Skip to content

Conversation

@jordanverasamy
Copy link
Contributor

WHY are these changes introduced?

Fixes #0000

WHAT is this pull request doing?

How to test your changes?

Post-release steps

Measuring impact

How do we know this change was effective? Please choose one:

  • n/a - this doesn't need measurement, e.g. a linting rule or a bug-fix
  • Existing analytics will cater for this addition
  • PR includes analytics changes to measure impact

Checklist

  • I've considered possible cross-platform impacts (Mac, Linux, Windows)
  • I've considered possible documentation changes

@jordanverasamy jordanverasamy requested review from a team as code owners November 3, 2025 23:49
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 3, 2025

We detected some changes at packages/*/src and there are no updates in the .changeset.
If the changes are user-facing, run pnpm changeset add to track your changes and include them in the next release CHANGELOG.

Caution

DO NOT create changesets for features which you do not wish to be included in the public changelog of the next CLI release.

@jordanverasamy jordanverasamy marked this pull request as draft November 3, 2025 23:50
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 3, 2025

Coverage report

St.
Category Percentage Covered / Total
🟡 Statements
79.1% (-0.17% 🔻)
13598/17190
🟡 Branches
72.99% (-0.16% 🔻)
6638/9095
🟡 Functions
79.27% (-0.09% 🔻)
3496/4410
🟡 Lines
79.45% (-0.18% 🔻)
12846/16168
Show new covered files 🐣
St.
File Statements Branches Functions Lines
🔴
... / flags.ts
0% 100% 100% 0%
🔴
... / index.ts
0% 100% 100% 0%
🔴
... / execute.ts
0% 0% 0% 0%
🟢
... / bulk-operations.ts
100% 95% 100% 100%
🟢
... / graphql-parser.ts
100% 100% 100% 100%
Show files with reduced coverage 🔻
St.
File Statements Branches Functions Lines
🟢
... / loader.ts
93.12% (-0.74% 🔻)
85.64% (-1.06% 🔻)
97.09% (+0.03% 🔼)
94.13% (-0.53% 🔻)
🟢
... / app_config_branding.ts
80% (-20% 🔻)
0% (-100% 🔻)
0% (-100% 🔻)
80% (-20% 🔻)
🟢
... / app-event-watcher.ts
98.04% (-0.16% 🔻)
90.24% (+1.36% 🔼)
96.3% (-0.37% 🔻)
100%
🟢
... / archiver.ts
89.47% (+2.38% 🔼)
66.67%
75% (-1.47% 🔻)
92.31% (+1.08% 🔼)
🟢
... / base-command.ts
89.58% (-1.33% 🔻)
88.57% (-0.32% 🔻)
87.5% (-2.5% 🔻)
90.36% (-1.04% 🔻)
🔴
... / custom-oclif-loader.ts
28.13% (-4.23% 🔻)
11.9% (-3.31% 🔻)
33.33%
28.13% (-4.23% 🔻)
🟢
... / liquid.ts
94.29%
81.25% (-6.25% 🔻)
100% 94.12%
🟢
... / output.ts
88.89%
64.29% (-7.14% 🔻)
88.89% 88.89%
🟡
... / api.ts
67.02%
50.62% (-1.19% 🔻)
65.71% 68.68%
🟢
... / push.ts
95.06% (-0.06% 🔻)
77.63% 100%
95% (-0.06% 🔻)
🟢
... / theme-fs.ts
81.14% (-0.38% 🔻)
63.27% (-1.83% 🔻)
71.43%
83.54% (-0.28% 🔻)
🟢
... / theme-uploader.ts
91.71% (-0.12% 🔻)
79.03% (+0.83% 🔼)
87.5% (+1.14% 🔼)
92.59% (-0.59% 🔻)

Test suite run success

3363 tests passing in 1375 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 33ed3e0

@jordanverasamy jordanverasamy force-pushed the jtv/implement-cli-bulk-ops-tool branch from 4ca8e9a to 55d7fed Compare November 4, 2025 17:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants