Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added Firework Launch Effect Section and removed Firework Launch effect. #4793

Closed
wants to merge 23 commits into from

Conversation

TFSMads
Copy link
Contributor

@TFSMads TFSMads commented Jun 9, 2022

Description

I have added a section to the firework launch effect, and removed the old firework launch effect.


Target Minecraft Versions: 1.11 and newer.
Requirements: No additional requirements.
Related Issues: No related issue.

@TPGamesNL TPGamesNL added the feature Pull request adding a new feature. label Jun 9, 2022
Copy link
Member

@AyhamAl-Ali AyhamAl-Ali left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice PR, just little formatting stuff

Copy link
Member

@APickledWalrus APickledWalrus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some additional formatting changes

@TheLimeGlass TheLimeGlass added enhancement Feature request, an issue about something that could be improved, or a PR improving something. and removed feature Pull request adding a new feature. labels Jun 30, 2022
Co-authored-by: APickledWalrus <apickledwalrus@gmail.com>
@TFSMads TFSMads requested a review from APickledWalrus July 15, 2022 09:20
 - Change power variable to Integer instead of Number so Number#intValue only has to be called once.
 - Changed Consumer type to Firework instead of ? extends Firework to remove Consumer cast.
 - Added parentheses in toString message
 - added NotNull annotation to getHandlers method
 - Removed SuppressWarnings from walk since it's no longer needed
@APickledWalrus
Copy link
Member

Once #4911 is merged you can adopt changes from there

Copy link
Member

@AyhamAl-Ali AyhamAl-Ali left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi :D

Co-authored-by: Ayham Al Ali <alali_ayham@yahoo.com>
@TheLimeGlass
Copy link
Contributor

@TFSMads Conflicts need to be resolved

@TheLimeGlass
Copy link
Contributor

Closing as stale, refactored at #5542

@TheLimeGlass TheLimeGlass removed their request for review April 28, 2023 09:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Feature request, an issue about something that could be improved, or a PR improving something.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants