[Gateway] New Contract Propposal #191
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* main: [Mailer] New Component and Contract (SonsOfPHP#190) [Mailer] New Component and Contract (SonsOfPHP#189) House Keeping (SonsOfPHP#188) [HttpHandler] Component (SonsOfPHP#187) [Container] New Component (SonsOfPHP#182) [Cookie] New Component & Contract (SonsOfPHP#181) [Pager] Doctrine Bridge (SonsOfPHP#175) fuckery (SonsOfPHP#174) [Money] Add Twig Bridge (SonsOfPHP#173) docs
github-actions
bot
added
documentation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #191 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 74.03% 74.03%
Complexity 1309 1309
=========================================
Files 207 207
Lines 3247 3247
=========================================
Hits 2404 2404
Misses 843 843 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
The idea behind this is to allow developers a single interface manage payments. This way, it reduces vendor lock-in because you can just swap payment processors (ie Stripe) with another. Can also have special processors like a round robin or one that routes visa to one processor and discover to another.
Checklist