Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat: Enhance vitest setup #49

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 13, 2024
Merged

Feat: Enhance vitest setup #49

merged 4 commits into from
Dec 13, 2024

Conversation

vfshera
Copy link
Collaborator

@vfshera vfshera commented Dec 12, 2024

This PR adds

@vfshera vfshera requested a review from tigawanna December 12, 2024 21:53
Copy link
Collaborator

@tigawanna tigawanna left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the PR. To maintain consistency and avoid test duplication, we should prefer using Playwright for testing entire pages. Playwright offers better tooling for component testing and runs tests across multiple browsers. Vitest should be reserved for simpler unit tests and used sparingly for component testing, as these tests can be time-consuming and consume our GitHub Action minutes.

@tigawanna tigawanna merged commit 31b7e9c into main Dec 13, 2024
1 check passed
@tigawanna tigawanna deleted the feat/enhance-vitest-setup branch December 13, 2024 08:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants