Consistent support for the "ver" action

[dune73]

Many rules have support for the ver action, but far from all. Namely the 949 rules are lacking.

We should add consistent support.

[fzipi]

@dune73 Do you want to add the same version for all?

In that case, we may want to use a var and just reference it everywhere.

@airween Should be capable of changing everything in no time using the parser :)

[airween]

Sure! :)

I assigned this issue for myself, let's discuss about the details.

[dune73]

Let's discuss it at the meeting.

[annawinkler]

I'd like to help out with this one!

[fgsch]

Meeting outcome: @airween with make sure this issue is solved together with Anna.

[airween]

There is a table about occurrence of ver actions (and with values). The point is that all rule must have a ver action? And what would be the correct value now? OWASP_CRS/3.2.0?

[dune73]

Decision during the CRS project chat on March 2, 2020: @airween will bring some consistency to this.

#1683 (comment)