-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 607
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
consider state-dependent leakage during sizing #6791
consider state-dependent leakage during sizing #6791
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Cho Moon <cmoon@precisioninno.com>
Signed-off-by: Cho Moon <cmoon@precisioninno.com>
Signed-off-by: Cho Moon <cmoon@precisioninno.com>
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
Signed-off-by: Cho Moon <cmoon@precisioninno.com>
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
Signed-off-by: Cho Moon <cmoon@precisioninno.com>
What's the point of taking the average state-based leakage? For all PDKs I can remember, the non-state-based leakage is already calculated as the average of the state-based leakages. This would only help if the average is weighted by state probability. |
Correct, if a liberty has "cell_leakage_power" line, it is the average of the state-based leakages. Most public PDKs have the average leakage. However, many private PDK liberty files don't have this line. They only have multiple leakage values for different when conditions. |
No description provided.