Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Added time for data dump + fix 500 error! #87

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

amindadgar
Copy link
Member

@amindadgar amindadgar commented Nov 1, 2024

  • createdAt and updatedAt for hivemind data dump
  • fixed the 500 error while the question is being answered
  • removed the old unused codes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced task status handling to ensure data is only persisted when tasks are successful.
    • Added timestamp fields (createdAt, updatedAt) to payloads for better tracking of data changes.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling in the ask_question_auto_search task to prevent silent failures and log errors appropriately.
  • Chores

    • Removed unused task related to Discord interaction, streamlining the codebase.

+ createdAt and updatedAt for hivemind data dump
+ fixed the 500 error while the question is being answered
+ removed the old unused codes.
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 1, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to three main files: routers/http.py, utils/persist_payload.py, and worker/tasks.py. The status endpoint in http.py now includes a conditional check for task success before persisting data. The persist_payload.py file has been updated to include timestamp fields in payloads for database persistence. Lastly, the tasks.py file sees the removal of an unused task and enhancements to error handling in an existing task.

Changes

File Change Summary
routers/http.py Added conditional check for task status in status endpoint; persists data only if task is "SUCCESS".
utils/persist_payload.py Added createdAt and updatedAt fields to payloads in persist_amqp and persist_http methods.
worker/tasks.py Removed ask_question_auto_search_discord_interaction task; enhanced error handling in ask_question_auto_search. Cleaned up unused imports.

Poem

In the code where rabbits play,
Changes hop in bright array.
Timestamps now in every byte,
Success leads the way, so bright!
Tasks refined, no more to stray,
Hooray for code, hip-hip-hooray! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cdc8938 and b2c84c7.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • routers/http.py (2 hunks)
  • utils/persist_payload.py (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • routers/http.py
  • utils/persist_payload.py

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
routers/http.py (1)

40-56: Improved error handling, but consider enhancing error details.

The changes correctly prevent 500 errors by checking task status before accessing the result, and ensure data consistency by only persisting successful tasks.

Consider enhancing error handling by including more detailed error information in the response when the task is not successful. Here's a suggested improvement:

     if task.status == "SUCCESS":
         # persisting the data updates in db
         persister = PersistPayload()

         http_payload = HTTPPayload(
             communityId=task.result["community_id"],
             question=QuestionModel(message=task.result["question"]),
             response=ResponseModel(message=task.result["response"]),
             taskId=task.id,
         )
         persister.persist_http(http_payload, update=True)

         results = {"id": task.id, "status": task.status, "result": task.result}
     else:
-        results = {"id": task.id, "status": task.status}
+        results = {
+            "id": task.id,
+            "status": task.status,
+            "error": str(task.result) if task.result else None
+        }

     return results
worker/tasks.py (1)

9-24: Consider adding task resilience mechanisms.

The task could benefit from additional reliability features:

  1. Retry mechanism for transient failures
  2. Timeout handling for LLM queries
  3. Task performance monitoring

Consider these enhancements:

 @app.task
+@app.task(
+    bind=True,
+    max_retries=3,
+    retry_backoff=True,
+    soft_time_limit=30,
+    time_limit=60
+)
-def ask_question_auto_search(
+def ask_question_auto_search(
+    self,
     community_id: str,
     query: str,
 ) -> dict[str, str]:
     try:
         response = query_data_sources(community_id=community_id, query=query)
+    except SoftTimeLimitExceeded:
+        logging.error("Task timed out for community %s", community_id)
+        raise self.retry(countdown=60)
     except Exception:
         response = "Sorry, We cannot process your question at the moment."
         logging.error(
             f"Errors raised while processing the question for community: {community_id}!"
         )

Also consider adding Prometheus metrics for monitoring task performance:

from prometheus_client import Counter, Histogram

TASK_LATENCY = Histogram('task_latency_seconds', 'Task latency in seconds')
TASK_ERRORS = Counter('task_errors_total', 'Total number of task errors')
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5cc5aee and 6cb7d41.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • routers/http.py (1 hunks)
  • utils/persist_payload.py (3 hunks)
  • worker/tasks.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
routers/http.py (1)

44-49: ⚠️ Potential issue

Verify error handling for missing result fields.

The code assumes the task.result dictionary will always contain the required keys. Consider adding validation to prevent potential KeyError exceptions.

Add validation before accessing dictionary keys:

         http_payload = HTTPPayload(
-            communityId=task.result["community_id"],
-            question=QuestionModel(message=task.result["question"]),
-            response=ResponseModel(message=task.result["response"]),
+            communityId=task.result.get("community_id"),
+            question=QuestionModel(message=task.result.get("question", "")),
+            response=ResponseModel(message=task.result.get("response", "")),
             taskId=task.id,
         )
worker/tasks.py (1)

1-1: Verify removal of discord interaction function.

Let's ensure there are no remaining references to the removed ask_question_auto_search_discord_interaction function.

✅ Verification successful

Since there were no matches found for the removed function ask_question_auto_search_discord_interaction, this indicates that there are no remaining references to it in the codebase. I can now generate the final response:

Function removal verified - no remaining references found

The removed function ask_question_auto_search_discord_interaction has no remaining references in the codebase, confirming it's safe to remove.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the removed function
rg "ask_question_auto_search_discord_interaction"

Length of output: 49

utils/persist_payload.py (2)

2-2: LGTM: Clean datetime import addition

The datetime import is correctly placed and properly utilized for timestamp fields.


Line range hint 1-85: Enhance error handling and input validation

Consider these security and robustness improvements:

  1. Add specific exception handling for MongoDB operations.
  2. Validate payload content before persistence.
  3. Sanitize sensitive data in logs.
  4. Add database operation timeouts.

Let's verify the current error handling patterns:

routers/http.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
worker/tasks.py Show resolved Hide resolved
utils/persist_payload.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
utils/persist_payload.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
and persisting the time of data dumps in utc timezone.
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
routers/http.py (2)

58-62: Consider standardizing the response structure.

The response structure differs between success and failure cases. Consider standardizing it to always include the same fields:

-        results = {"id": task.id, "status": task.status, "result": task.result}
-    else:
-        results = {"id": task.id, "status": task.status}
+        results = {
+            "id": task.id,
+            "status": task.status,
+            "result": task.result if task.status == "SUCCESS" else None,
+            "error": None
+        }
+    else:
+        results = {
+            "id": task.id,
+            "status": task.status,
+            "result": None,
+            "error": task.info if task.status == "FAILURE" else None
+        }

42-42: Add type hints to improve code clarity.

Consider adding return type hints to the async function for better code maintainability:

-async def status(task_id: str):
+async def status(task_id: str) -> dict:
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6cb7d41 and cdc8938.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • routers/http.py (2 hunks)
  • utils/persist_payload.py (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • utils/persist_payload.py
🔇 Additional comments (2)
routers/http.py (2)

1-2: LGTM: Appropriate logging import added.

The addition of the logging module aligns well with the new error handling implementation.


51-57: LGTM: Proper error handling implemented.

The implementation follows the suggested error handling pattern from previous reviews, with appropriate logging of exceptions.

@amindadgar amindadgar merged commit db72e35 into main Nov 4, 2024
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant