-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Added time for data dump + fix 500 error! #87
Conversation
+ createdAt and updatedAt for hivemind data dump + fixed the 500 error while the question is being answered + removed the old unused codes.
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to three main files: Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
routers/http.py (1)
40-56
: Improved error handling, but consider enhancing error details.The changes correctly prevent 500 errors by checking task status before accessing the result, and ensure data consistency by only persisting successful tasks.
Consider enhancing error handling by including more detailed error information in the response when the task is not successful. Here's a suggested improvement:
if task.status == "SUCCESS": # persisting the data updates in db persister = PersistPayload() http_payload = HTTPPayload( communityId=task.result["community_id"], question=QuestionModel(message=task.result["question"]), response=ResponseModel(message=task.result["response"]), taskId=task.id, ) persister.persist_http(http_payload, update=True) results = {"id": task.id, "status": task.status, "result": task.result} else: - results = {"id": task.id, "status": task.status} + results = { + "id": task.id, + "status": task.status, + "error": str(task.result) if task.result else None + } return resultsworker/tasks.py (1)
9-24
: Consider adding task resilience mechanisms.The task could benefit from additional reliability features:
- Retry mechanism for transient failures
- Timeout handling for LLM queries
- Task performance monitoring
Consider these enhancements:
@app.task +@app.task( + bind=True, + max_retries=3, + retry_backoff=True, + soft_time_limit=30, + time_limit=60 +) -def ask_question_auto_search( +def ask_question_auto_search( + self, community_id: str, query: str, ) -> dict[str, str]: try: response = query_data_sources(community_id=community_id, query=query) + except SoftTimeLimitExceeded: + logging.error("Task timed out for community %s", community_id) + raise self.retry(countdown=60) except Exception: response = "Sorry, We cannot process your question at the moment." logging.error( f"Errors raised while processing the question for community: {community_id}!" )Also consider adding Prometheus metrics for monitoring task performance:
from prometheus_client import Counter, Histogram TASK_LATENCY = Histogram('task_latency_seconds', 'Task latency in seconds') TASK_ERRORS = Counter('task_errors_total', 'Total number of task errors')
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
routers/http.py
(1 hunks)utils/persist_payload.py
(3 hunks)worker/tasks.py
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
routers/http.py (1)
44-49
:
Verify error handling for missing result fields.
The code assumes the task.result dictionary will always contain the required keys. Consider adding validation to prevent potential KeyError exceptions.
Add validation before accessing dictionary keys:
http_payload = HTTPPayload(
- communityId=task.result["community_id"],
- question=QuestionModel(message=task.result["question"]),
- response=ResponseModel(message=task.result["response"]),
+ communityId=task.result.get("community_id"),
+ question=QuestionModel(message=task.result.get("question", "")),
+ response=ResponseModel(message=task.result.get("response", "")),
taskId=task.id,
)
worker/tasks.py (1)
1-1
: Verify removal of discord interaction function.
Let's ensure there are no remaining references to the removed ask_question_auto_search_discord_interaction
function.
✅ Verification successful
Since there were no matches found for the removed function ask_question_auto_search_discord_interaction
, this indicates that there are no remaining references to it in the codebase. I can now generate the final response:
Function removal verified - no remaining references found
The removed function ask_question_auto_search_discord_interaction
has no remaining references in the codebase, confirming it's safe to remove.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the removed function
rg "ask_question_auto_search_discord_interaction"
Length of output: 49
utils/persist_payload.py (2)
2-2
: LGTM: Clean datetime import addition
The datetime import is correctly placed and properly utilized for timestamp fields.
Line range hint 1-85
: Enhance error handling and input validation
Consider these security and robustness improvements:
- Add specific exception handling for MongoDB operations.
- Validate payload content before persistence.
- Sanitize sensitive data in logs.
- Add database operation timeouts.
Let's verify the current error handling patterns:
and persisting the time of data dumps in utc timezone.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
routers/http.py (2)
58-62
: Consider standardizing the response structure.The response structure differs between success and failure cases. Consider standardizing it to always include the same fields:
- results = {"id": task.id, "status": task.status, "result": task.result} - else: - results = {"id": task.id, "status": task.status} + results = { + "id": task.id, + "status": task.status, + "result": task.result if task.status == "SUCCESS" else None, + "error": None + } + else: + results = { + "id": task.id, + "status": task.status, + "result": None, + "error": task.info if task.status == "FAILURE" else None + }
42-42
: Add type hints to improve code clarity.Consider adding return type hints to the async function for better code maintainability:
-async def status(task_id: str): +async def status(task_id: str) -> dict:
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
routers/http.py
(2 hunks)utils/persist_payload.py
(3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- utils/persist_payload.py
🔇 Additional comments (2)
routers/http.py (2)
1-2
: LGTM: Appropriate logging import added.
The addition of the logging module aligns well with the new error handling implementation.
51-57
: LGTM: Proper error handling implemented.
The implementation follows the suggested error handling pattern from previous reviews, with appropriate logging of exceptions.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
createdAt
,updatedAt
) to payloads for better tracking of data changes.Bug Fixes
ask_question_auto_search
task to prevent silent failures and log errors appropriately.Chores