Linking service #7
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Behzad-rabiei has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 43 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThis update introduces a GitHub Actions workflow for building and pushing Docker images while refining the CI pipeline for better readability. Additionally, it adds a comprehensive test suite for the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant CI/CD
participant Docker Registry
User->>CI/CD: Trigger workflow
CI/CD->>CI/CD: Checkout code
CI/CD->>CI/CD: Setup Buildx
CI/CD->>Docker Registry: Login
CI/CD->>CI/CD: Generate metadata
CI/CD->>Docker Registry: Build and push image
CI/CD-->>User: Workflow completed
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- .github/workflows/build-push.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ci.yml (1 hunks)
- src/lit/lit.service.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .github/workflows/ci.yml
- src/main.ts
Additional comments not posted (10)
.github/workflows/build-push.yml (3)
1-7: LGTM! Theonandenvsections are well-configured.The use of
workflow_callis appropriate for reusable workflows, and the environment variables are correctly set for Docker operations.
8-15: LGTM! Thejobssection is correctly configured.The permissions are appropriately set for accessing repository contents and pushing Docker images.
16-34: LGTM! Thestepssection is well-structured.The steps are logically ordered and use appropriate actions for Docker operations. The use of
${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}for authentication is secure.src/lit/lit.service.spec.ts (7)
20-53: LGTM! ThebeforeEachsetup is comprehensive and well-structured.The testing module is correctly initialized, and dependencies are mocked appropriately.
79-85: LGTM! Thedisconnecttest case is well-implemented.The test case effectively verifies the expected behavior of the
disconnectmethod.
88-103: LGTM! ThegetNetworkConfigtest cases are comprehensive.The test cases cover both successful retrieval and error scenarios for unsupported networks.
106-125: LGTM! ThegetContractAddresstest cases are well-structured.The test cases effectively cover both supported and unsupported chain ID scenarios.
128-167: LGTM! ThegenerateEvmContractConditionstest cases are comprehensive.The test cases ensure correct generation of conditions and handle errors for unsupported chain IDs.
170-194: LGTM! Theencrypttest case is well-implemented.The test case effectively verifies successful encryption and the correct invocation of
encryptToJson.
59-77: Consider re-enabling or removing commented-out test cases.The commented-out test cases for
connectand error handling inencryptshould be reviewed to determine their necessity. If they are still relevant, consider re-enabling them with any needed updates.Also applies to: 195-210
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/build-push.yml (1 hunks)
- jest.config.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .github/workflows/build-push.yml
Additional comments not posted (1)
jest.config.json (1)
9-9: Approved: Coverage collection scope refined.The change to
"collectCoverageFrom": ["src/**/*.ts*"]narrows the coverage collection to TypeScript files within thesrcdirectory, which is appropriate for focusing on source files. Ensure that all relevant files are included in this directory structure.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- docker-compose.dev.yml (1 hunks)
- docker-compose.prod.yml (1 hunks)
- docker-compose.test.yml (1 hunks)
- src/auth-discord/config/auth-discord.config.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Gitleaks
docker-compose.prod.yml
20-21: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
docker-compose.test.yml
20-21: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
docker-compose.dev.yml
20-21: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
Additional comments not posted (9)
Dockerfile (1)
19-23: Enhancement: Improved security with--ignore-scripts.The addition of
--ignore-scriptsto thenpm installcommand in the production stage is a good practice to enhance security by preventing potentially harmful scripts from running during installation.src/auth-discord/config/auth-discord.config.ts (1)
20-20: Improvement: Added URI validation forDISCORD_REDIRECT_URI.The addition of
.uri()to the Joi schema forDISCORD_REDIRECT_URIensures that the value is a valid URI, improving configuration robustness and reducing potential errors.docker-compose.prod.yml (1)
1-24: Approval: Configuration enhancements and log level adjustment.The renaming of
DISCORD_CALLBACK_URItoDISCORD_REDIRECT_URIaligns with other changes, and the log level adjustment toinfois suitable for production. The addition of new environment variables enhances the application's configurability.Tools
Gitleaks
20-21: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
docker-compose.test.yml (3)
12-14: Verify the correctness of environment variable values.Ensure that the
DISCORD_CLIENT_ID,DISCORD_CLIENT_SECRET,GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID, andGOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRETvalues are correctly configured for the test environment. These values should be placeholders or test credentials to avoid exposing sensitive information.Also applies to: 15-17
18-19: Ensure secure handling of secrets.The
SESSION_SECRETandJWT_SECRETshould be securely managed and not hardcoded. Consider using environment-specific secret management solutions.
22-22: Review logging level configuration.The logging level has been set to
info. Ensure this level is appropriate for the test environment, balancing verbosity and performance.docker-compose.dev.yml (3)
12-14: Verify the correctness of environment variable values.Ensure that the
DISCORD_CLIENT_ID,DISCORD_CLIENT_SECRET,GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID, andGOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRETvalues are correctly configured for the development environment. These values should be placeholders or development credentials to avoid exposing sensitive information.Also applies to: 15-17
18-19: Ensure secure handling of secrets.The
SESSION_SECRETandJWT_SECRETshould be securely managed and not hardcoded. Consider using environment-specific secret management solutions.
22-22: Review logging level configuration.The logging level has been set to
info. Ensure this level is appropriate for the development environment, balancing verbosity and performance.
docker-compose.prod.yml
Outdated
| - WALLET_PRIVATE_KEY=0x85167e00aeed1db6a59945f1f78f997856e2e312cf4e55cde90b740b71f9808c | ||
| - WALLET_PUBLIC_KEY=x |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security Warning: Potential API Key Exposure.
The WALLET_PRIVATE_KEY appears to be a sensitive value. Ensure that sensitive information is not hardcoded and is securely managed, such as through environment variables or secret management tools.
Tools
Gitleaks
20-21: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
docker-compose.test.yml
Outdated
| - WALLET_PRIVATE_KEY=0x85167e00aeed1db6a59945f1f78f997856e2e312cf4e55cde90b740b71f9808c | ||
| - WALLET_PUBLIC_KEY=x |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Address potential security risk with WALLET keys.
The WALLET_PRIVATE_KEY and WALLET_PUBLIC_KEY are detected as generic API keys. Ensure these are not hardcoded in production configurations and are securely managed.
- WALLET_PRIVATE_KEY=0x85167e00aeed1db6a59945f1f78f997856e2e312cf4e55cde90b740b71f9808c
- WALLET_PUBLIC_KEY=x
+ WALLET_PRIVATE_KEY=${WALLET_PRIVATE_KEY}
+ WALLET_PUBLIC_KEY=${WALLET_PUBLIC_KEY}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - WALLET_PRIVATE_KEY=0x85167e00aeed1db6a59945f1f78f997856e2e312cf4e55cde90b740b71f9808c | |
| - WALLET_PUBLIC_KEY=x | |
| - WALLET_PRIVATE_KEY=${WALLET_PRIVATE_KEY} | |
| - WALLET_PUBLIC_KEY=${WALLET_PUBLIC_KEY} |
Tools
Gitleaks
20-21: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
docker-compose.dev.yml
Outdated
| - WALLET_PUBLIC_KEY=x |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Address potential security risk with WALLET keys.
The WALLET_PRIVATE_KEY and WALLET_PUBLIC_KEY are detected as generic API keys. Ensure these are not hardcoded in production configurations and are securely managed.
- WALLET_PRIVATE_KEY=0x85167e00aeed1db6a59945f1f78f997856e2e312cf4e55cde90b740b71f9808c
- WALLET_PUBLIC_KEY=x
+ WALLET_PRIVATE_KEY=${WALLET_PRIVATE_KEY}
+ WALLET_PUBLIC_KEY=${WALLET_PUBLIC_KEY}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - WALLET_PRIVATE_KEY=0x85167e00aeed1db6a59945f1f78f997856e2e312cf4e55cde90b740b71f9808c | |
| - WALLET_PUBLIC_KEY=x | |
| - WALLET_PRIVATE_KEY=${WALLET_PRIVATE_KEY} | |
| - WALLET_PUBLIC_KEY=${WALLET_PUBLIC_KEY} |
Tools
Gitleaks
20-21: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores