1 create project boilerplate #2
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Behzad-rabiei has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 25 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes introduced in this pull request encompass the addition of multiple configuration files and workflows for a NestJS application, including ESLint, Prettier, and Jest configurations. New GitHub Actions workflows for CI/CD processes, such as linting, testing, and building Docker images, have also been established. The project structure has been enhanced with Docker Compose files for different environments and a comprehensive README file. Additionally, several service and controller classes have been implemented, along with their corresponding tests, to establish a foundational application structure. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 37
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
src/app.service.ts (1)
4-8: Consider adding JSDoc documentation and configuration flexibility.
While the implementation is correct, consider these improvements to set better practices for the project:
- Add JSDoc documentation to describe the service and method
- Make the greeting message configurable via environment variables
Here's a suggested improvement:
@Injectable()
export class AppService {
+ constructor(
+ @Inject('CONFIG')
+ private readonly config: { greeting?: string } = { greeting: 'Hello World!' },
+ ) {}
+
+ /**
+ * Returns a greeting message
+ * @returns A string containing the configured greeting message
+ */
getHello(): string {
- return 'Hello World!';
+ return this.config.greeting;
}
}.github/workflows/test.yml (1)
1-10: Consider adding test result artifacts
The workflow could benefit from storing test results and coverage reports as artifacts.
Consider adding these steps after the test execution:
- name: Upload test results
if: always()
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
with:
name: test-results
path: |
coverage/
test-results/
retention-days: 30src/app.controller.ts (2)
4-6: Consider specifying a route path prefix.
The empty @Controller() decorator means this controller handles routes at the root path '/'. For better API organization, consider adding a path prefix (e.g., @Controller('api')), especially as the application grows.
-@Controller()
+@Controller('api')The dependency injection setup is well-implemented with proper use of the readonly modifier.
1-12: Consider adding a health check endpoint.
Since this is a project boilerplate, consider adding a health check endpoint using @nestjs/terminus. This is crucial for container orchestration and monitoring.
Example implementation:
import { HealthCheck, HealthCheckService } from '@nestjs/terminus';
@Get('health')
@HealthCheck()
checkHealth() {
return this.health.check([]);
}docker-compose.prod.yml (1)
3-12: Add production-grade configurations
The current configuration lacks several important production-ready features.
Consider adding:
- Health check for container monitoring:
healthcheck:
test: ["CMD", "curl", "-f", "http://localhost:3000/health"]
interval: 30s
timeout: 10s
retries: 3- Resource limits to prevent resource exhaustion:
deploy:
resources:
limits:
cpus: '1'
memory: 1G
reservations:
cpus: '0.5'
memory: 512M- Restart policy for automatic recovery:
restart: unless-stopped- Explicit port mapping for better control:
ports:
- "3000:3000"src/app.controller.spec.ts (2)
17-22: Enhance test coverage with additional scenarios.
The current test suite only covers the happy path. Consider adding:
- Documentation explaining the test's purpose
- Tests for error scenarios
- Validation of response type
describe('root', () => {
+ // Verifies that the root endpoint returns the expected greeting message
it('should return "Hello World!"', () => {
expect(appController.getHello()).toBe('Hello World!');
});
+
+ it('should return a string type', () => {
+ expect(typeof appController.getHello()).toBe('string');
+ });
});1-22: Consider establishing test documentation standards.
As this is a project boilerplate, this test file will serve as a template for future tests. Consider:
- Adding a test documentation template in comments
- Including examples of different types of assertions
- Setting up test coverage thresholds
Example test documentation template to add at the top of the file:
/**
* Test suite for AppController
*
* Purpose:
* - Validates the basic functionality of the application's root controller
* - Serves as an example for writing controller tests
*
* Coverage Expectations:
* - All public methods should have basic functionality tests
* - Error scenarios should be covered
* - Type checking should be included
*/test/app.e2e-spec.ts (1)
1-24: Consider adding more comprehensive test cases.
As this is a boilerplate setup, consider adding:
- Error handling test cases (404, 500)
- Request timeout scenarios
- Input validation tests if using DTOs
- Authentication/Authorization tests if applicable
This will provide a good foundation for future development.
.github/workflows/lint.yml (1)
1-8: Consider using a more conventional workflow name
The workflow name "lint Workflow" is redundant with "Workflow" and inconsistent with conventional GitHub Actions naming. Consider renaming it to just "Lint" or "Code Linting".
-name: lint Workflow
+name: Lintpackage.json (1)
1-7: Complete the project metadata fields.
The description and author fields are empty. Consider adding:
- A clear project description explaining the purpose of this OCI backend
- Author information for maintenance contact
README.md (2)
31-33: Consider removing $ prefix from command examples.
The $ prefix before commands is redundant when not showing command output. Consider removing them for cleaner documentation.
Example fix for the install section:
```bash
-$ npm install
+npm install
Also applies to: 50-59
<details>
<summary>🧰 Tools</summary>
<details>
<summary>🪛 Markdownlint</summary>
32-32: null
Dollar signs used before commands without showing output
(MD014, commands-show-output)
</details>
</details>
---
`63-63`: **Consider language improvements in the Support section.**
Minor language improvements suggested:
- Use "open-source" instead of "open source" when used as a compound adjective
- Consider using more specific language instead of "amazing" (e.g., "dedicated", "valued")
```diff
-Nest is an MIT-licensed open source project. It can grow thanks to the sponsors and support by the amazing backers.
+Nest is an MIT-licensed open-source project. It can grow thanks to the sponsors and support by the dedicated backers.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~63-~63: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...`` ## Support Nest is an MIT-licensed open source project. It can grow thanks to the spon...
(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)
[style] ~63-~63: Consider using a more formal and expressive alternative to ‘amazing’.
Context: ...anks to the sponsors and support by the amazing backers. If you'd like to join them, pl...
(AWESOME)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (32)
- .eslintrc.js (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/build-push.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ci.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/lint.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- .husky/commit-msg (1 hunks)
- .husky/post-commit (1 hunks)
- .husky/pre-commit (1 hunks)
- .husky/pre-push (1 hunks)
- .lintstagedrc.json (1 hunks)
- .prettierrc (1 hunks)
- Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- commitlint.config.js (1 hunks)
- docker-compose.dev.yml (1 hunks)
- docker-compose.prod.yml (1 hunks)
- docker-compose.test.yml (1 hunks)
- docker-compose.yml (1 hunks)
- jest.config.json (1 hunks)
- nest-cli.json (1 hunks)
- nginx/templates/default.conf.template (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- src/app.controller.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/app.controller.ts (1 hunks)
- src/app.module.ts (1 hunks)
- src/app.service.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main.ts (1 hunks)
- test/app.e2e-spec.ts (1 hunks)
- test/jest-e2e.json (1 hunks)
- tsconfig.build.json (1 hunks)
- tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (14)
- .eslintrc.js
- .gitignore
- .husky/post-commit
- .husky/pre-commit
- .lintstagedrc.json
- .prettierrc
- commitlint.config.js
- jest.config.json
- nest-cli.json
- src/app.module.ts
- src/main.ts
- test/jest-e2e.json
- tsconfig.build.json
- tsconfig.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[uncategorized] ~63-~63: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...`` ## Support Nest is an MIT-licensed open source project. It can grow thanks to the spon...
(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)
[style] ~63-~63: Consider using a more formal and expressive alternative to ‘amazing’.
Context: ...anks to the sponsors and support by the amazing backers. If you'd like to join them, pl...
(AWESOME)
🪛 Markdownlint
README.md
32-32: null
Dollar signs used before commands without showing output
(MD014, commands-show-output)
18-18: null
Images should have alternate text (alt text)
(MD045, no-alt-text)
20-20: null
Images should have alternate text (alt text)
(MD045, no-alt-text)
5-5: Unused link or image reference definition: "circleci-image"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
6-6: Unused link or image reference definition: "circleci-url"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
🪛 Gitleaks
README.md
5-5: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🔇 Additional comments (22)
.husky/commit-msg (1)
1-1: Verify the commit-msg hook setup.
Ensure that:
- The commit-msg hook has executable permissions
- The required dependencies are installed
Run these commands to verify the setup:
✅ Verification successful
Commit message hook setup is properly configured
The verification shows that:
- The commit-msg hook has correct executable permissions (-rwxr-xr-x)
- Required dependencies are installed:
- @commitlint/cli (^19.5.0)
- @commitlint/config-conventional (^19.5.0)
- husky (^9.1.6)
- Commitlint is properly configured with conventional commits in commitlint.config.js
- Husky is correctly set up with the prepare script in package.json
While .husky/_ directory is not present, this is not required for newer versions of husky (v9+) which use a different installation method.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify husky commit-msg hook setup
# Test 1: Check if the commit-msg hook is executable
ls -l .husky/commit-msg
# Test 2: Verify commitlint configuration
cat package.json | grep -A 5 "devDependencies" | grep "commitlint"
cat commitlint.config.js 2>/dev/null || echo "commitlint.config.js not found"
# Test 3: Check if husky is properly configured in package.json
cat package.json | grep -A 5 "scripts" | grep "prepare"
Length of output: 390
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the husky prepare script and installation
cat package.json | jq -r '.scripts | select(.prepare != null)'
# Check if husky is installed as a dependency
cat package.json | jq -r '.devDependencies | select(."husky" != null)'
# Check if husky directory is properly set up
ls -la .husky/_
Length of output: 1717
src/app.service.ts (1)
1-3: LGTM! Proper use of NestJS decorators and imports.
The import statement is clean and the @Injectable() decorator is correctly applied.
.github/workflows/test.yml (2)
1-4: Add explicit permissions to the workflow
For security best practices, explicitly define the required permissions for this workflow.
[security]
Add the following permissions block:
name: test Workflow
on:
workflow_call:
+ permissions:
+ contents: read1-10: Verify docker-compose.test.yml configuration
Ensure that the test environment is properly configured.
Let's check the docker-compose.test.yml file:
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the Dockerfile configuration to ensure the test target is properly defined.
Docker test configuration is properly set up
The test environment is correctly configured:
- Dockerfile has a dedicated
testtarget that runs Jest with coverage - docker-compose.test.yml properly references the test target and sets required environment variables
- Test scripts are properly defined in package.json
- Volume mapping for coverage reports is correctly configured
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the docker-compose.test.yml configuration
# Test: Check if docker-compose.test.yml exists and contains necessary configurations
if [ -f "docker-compose.test.yml" ]; then
echo "Found docker-compose.test.yml"
cat docker-compose.test.yml
else
echo "Error: docker-compose.test.yml not found"
exit 1
fi
# Test: Check for test-specific environment variables
rg -l '\.env\.test' || echo "Warning: No .env.test file reference found"
Length of output: 519
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Dockerfile for test target configuration
if [ -f "Dockerfile" ]; then
echo "Found Dockerfile"
cat Dockerfile
else
echo "Error: Dockerfile not found"
exit 1
fi
# Check for test-related scripts in package.json
if [ -f "package.json" ]; then
echo -e "\nChecking package.json for test scripts:"
cat package.json | jq '.scripts | select(.test != null)'
fi
Length of output: 1325
.github/workflows/ci.yml (2)
6-14: Verify referenced workflow files exist.
The pipeline references three workflow files that need to be present:
.github/workflows/lint.yml.github/workflows/test.yml.github/workflows/build-push.yml
#!/bin/bash
# Check if all referenced workflow files exist
for workflow in lint.yml test.yml build-push.yml; do
if [ ! -f ".github/workflows/$workflow" ]; then
echo "Missing workflow file: $workflow"
fi
done2-4: Consider adding branch filters for security.
The current configuration runs on all pushes and pull requests, which could lead to unnecessary workflow runs and potential security risks. Consider adding branch filters:
on:
push:
+ branches:
+ - main
+ - 'releases/**'
pull_request:
+ branches:
+ - mainAlso, ensure branch protection rules are in place to prevent direct pushes to protected branches.
src/app.controller.ts (1)
1-2: LGTM! Clean and minimal imports.
The imports are well-organized and follow NestJS best practices.
docker-compose.test.yml (2)
1-7: LGTM: Docker configuration setup looks good.
The Docker Compose version and build configuration are properly structured. Using a multi-stage build with the test target is a good practice for separating test environment concerns.
13-14: Consider adding .coverage to .gitignore.
The coverage volume mount is correctly configured, but ensure that the coverage directory is added to .gitignore to prevent committing test coverage reports.
Let's verify if .gitignore is properly configured:
docker-compose.dev.yml (2)
1-7: LGTM: Docker Compose configuration setup is appropriate.
The service configuration with multi-stage build targeting development environment is well structured.
1-16: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Verify Docker health check configuration.
The service configuration lacks health checks which are important for container orchestration and dependency management.
Let's check if health checks are defined in other services:
Consider adding health check:
volumes:
- ./coverage:/project/coverage
+ healthcheck:
+ test: ["CMD", "curl", "-f", "http://localhost:3000/health"]
+ interval: 30s
+ timeout: 10s
+ retries: 3docker-compose.yml (2)
1-2: LGTM! Version and structure are well-defined.
The use of version 3.9 provides access to modern Docker Compose features.
18-24: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance app service configuration for production readiness.
Consider adding the following production-grade configurations:
- Restart policy
- Health check
- Resource limits
- Container name (for consistency)
app:
+ container_name: app
build:
context: .
target: production
dockerfile: Dockerfile
+ restart: unless-stopped
+ healthcheck:
+ test: ["CMD", "curl", "-f", "http://localhost:3000/health"]
+ interval: 30s
+ timeout: 10s
+ retries: 3
+ deploy:
+ resources:
+ limits:
+ cpus: '1'
+ memory: 1G
+ reservations:
+ cpus: '0.5'
+ memory: 512M
env_file:
- .envVerify the existence of required environment files.
The configuration references environment files that are crucial for proper operation.
#!/bin/bash
# Check if required env files exist
if [[ ! -f .env || ! -f .env.nginx ]]; then
echo "Missing required environment files"
ls -la .env* 2>/dev/null
fisrc/app.controller.spec.ts (1)
1-3: LGTM! Imports are properly structured.
All necessary testing utilities and components are correctly imported.
test/app.e2e-spec.ts (1)
6-8: LGTM!
The test suite setup follows NestJS testing best practices with proper typing.
.github/workflows/lint.yml (1)
9-10: LGTM!
Using the latest stable version (v4) of actions/checkout is appropriate.
package.json (3)
41-66: LGTM! Comprehensive development tooling setup.
The development dependencies include all necessary tools for a robust development workflow:
- TypeScript and testing utilities
- Linting and formatting tools
- Commit message linting with commitlint
- Source maps for debugging
24-24: Verify Husky git hooks configuration.
The prepare script indicates Husky is being used for git hooks, but we should verify its configuration.
#!/bin/bash
# Check for Husky configuration
if [ -d ".husky" ]; then
echo "Husky directory exists"
ls -la .husky/
else
echo "Missing Husky configuration directory"
fi
# Check for commitlint configuration
if [ -f "commitlint.config.js" ] || [ -f ".commitlintrc.json" ]; then
echo "Found commitlint configuration"
else
echo "Missing commitlint configuration"
fi21-23: Verify Docker Compose files existence and configuration.
The scripts reference three Docker Compose files:
- docker-compose.prod.yml
- docker-compose.dev.yml
- docker-compose.test.yml
Let's verify these files are properly set up.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the Docker Compose files with a different command since the previous output seems to be related to Husky configuration instead.
Docker Compose files are properly configured
All required Docker Compose files exist and are properly configured:
docker-compose.dev.yml: Development environment setup with hot-reload volumesdocker-compose.prod.yml: Production environment configurationdocker-compose.test.yml: Test environment setup- Additional
docker-compose.ymlwith Nginx configuration for production deployment
Each environment-specific compose file correctly sets:
- Appropriate NODE_ENV
- Consistent port mapping (3000)
- Volume mounting for coverage reports
- Correct build target (development/production/test)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if all required Docker Compose files exist
for env in prod dev test; do
if [ -f "docker-compose.${env}.yml" ]; then
echo "Found docker-compose.${env}.yml"
# Show the first few lines to verify basic structure
head -n 5 "docker-compose.${env}.yml"
else
echo "Missing docker-compose.${env}.yml"
fi
done
Length of output: 540
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# List all docker-compose files in the repository
fd "docker-compose" --type f
# If any files are found, show their contents
for file in $(fd "docker-compose" --type f); do
echo "=== Contents of $file ==="
cat "$file"
echo -e "\n"
done
Length of output: 2176
nginx/templates/default.conf.template (3)
11-11: Review and update the ssl_ciphers directive to include only strong ciphers
Ensure that the ciphers listed in ssl_ciphers meet current security standards. Over time, some ciphers become outdated or vulnerable. Regularly updating this list helps maintain strong encryption.
14-15: Confirm the DNS resolver is correctly configured
Using resolver 127.0.0.11 is typical within Docker containers to utilize the embedded DNS server. Ensure this resolver address is appropriate for your deployment environment to prevent DNS resolution issues.
30-31: Verify IPv6 support in your environment
Your server is set to listen on IPv6 addresses. Confirm that your network and infrastructure fully support IPv6 to avoid potential connectivity problems.
| npm test | ||
| npx lint - staged |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add shebang and fix the lint-staged command.
The pre-push hook has a few issues that need to be addressed:
- Missing shebang line for shell script execution
- Incorrect spacing in the
lint-stagedcommand - Missing error handling
Apply this diff to fix the issues:
+#!/bin/sh
+. "$(dirname "$0")/_/husky.sh"
+
-npm test
-npx lint - staged
+npm test || exit 1
+npx lint-staged || exit 1📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| npm test | |
| npx lint - staged | |
| #!/bin/sh | |
| . "$(dirname "$0")/_/husky.sh" | |
| npm test || exit 1 | |
| npx lint-staged || exit 1 |
💡 Codebase verification
Pre-push hook requires executable permissions
The pre-push hook file currently has read-write permissions (644) but lacks executable permissions required for Git hooks to function properly.
- Change permissions to make the file executable:
chmod +x .husky/pre-push
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify file permissions.
Ensure the pre-push hook is executable.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the pre-push hook has executable permissions
# Expected: File should have executable permissions (755 or similar)
ls -l .husky/pre-push
Length of output: 86
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
| npx --no-install commitlint --edit $1 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add shell interpreter and error handling.
The script should include a shell interpreter declaration and basic error handling to ensure proper execution.
Apply this diff to improve the script:
+#!/usr/bin/env sh
+. "$(dirname -- "$0")/_/husky.sh"
+
+# Ensure commitlint is available
+if ! command -v npx &> /dev/null; then
+ echo "Error: npx is not installed"
+ exit 1
+fi
+
npx --no-install commitlint --edit $1📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| npx --no-install commitlint --edit $1 | |
| #!/usr/bin/env sh | |
| . "$(dirname -- "$0")/_/husky.sh" | |
| # Ensure commitlint is available | |
| if ! command -v npx &> /dev/null; then | |
| echo "Error: npx is not installed" | |
| exit 1 | |
| fi | |
| npx --no-install commitlint --edit $1 |
| import { Injectable } from '@nestjs/common'; | ||
|
|
||
| @Injectable() | ||
| export class AppService { | ||
| getHello(): string { | ||
| return 'Hello World!'; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Missing dedicated test coverage for AppService
The service is only indirectly tested through the AppController tests. While the getHello() functionality is covered, it's recommended to have dedicated unit tests for the service layer:
- Create
src/app.service.spec.tswith direct unit tests for AppService - Test cases should verify the
getHello()method in isolation
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify test coverage for the service.
The AI summary mentions that tests exist for this service. Let's verify the test coverage.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for the existence and content of test files for AppService
# Look for test files related to AppService
echo "Searching for AppService test files..."
rg -l "AppService" --glob "**/*.spec.ts"
# Check test content
echo -e "\nChecking test implementation..."
rg "describe.*AppService" -A 10
Length of output: 267
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the test file we found
echo "Checking app.controller.spec.ts content..."
cat src/app.controller.spec.ts
# Also check if there's a dedicated app.service.spec.ts
echo -e "\nChecking for app.service.spec.ts..."
fd "app.service.spec.ts"
Length of output: 856
| test: | ||
| name: Test | ||
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
| steps: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add timeout and concurrency limits
To prevent hanging jobs and resource contention, add timeout and concurrency controls.
[security]
Add the following configurations:
jobs:
test:
name: Test
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+ timeout-minutes: 15
+ concurrency:
+ group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref }}
+ cancel-in-progress: true📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| test: | |
| name: Test | |
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | |
| steps: | |
| test: | |
| name: Test | |
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | |
| timeout-minutes: 15 | |
| concurrency: | |
| group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref }} | |
| cancel-in-progress: true | |
| steps: |
| - uses: actions/checkout@v4 | ||
| - run: docker compose -f docker-compose.test.yml up --exit-code-from app |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance the test execution step
The current implementation could be improved with better error handling, caching, and test result collection.
Consider these improvements:
- - uses: actions/checkout@v4
- - run: docker compose -f docker-compose.test.yml up --exit-code-from app
+ - name: Checkout repository
+ uses: actions/checkout@v4
+
+ - name: Set up Docker Buildx
+ uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v3
+
+ - name: Cache Docker layers
+ uses: actions/cache@v3
+ with:
+ path: /tmp/.buildx-cache
+ key: ${{ runner.os }}-buildx-${{ github.sha }}
+ restore-keys: |
+ ${{ runner.os }}-buildx-
+
+ - name: Run tests
+ run: |
+ docker compose -f docker-compose.test.yml up --exit-code-from app --build
+ env:
+ COMPOSE_DOCKER_CLI_BUILD: 1
+ DOCKER_BUILDKIT: 1
+
+ - name: Cleanup
+ if: always()
+ run: docker compose -f docker-compose.test.yml down --volumes --remove-orphans📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - uses: actions/checkout@v4 | |
| - run: docker compose -f docker-compose.test.yml up --exit-code-from app | |
| - name: Checkout repository | |
| uses: actions/checkout@v4 | |
| - name: Set up Docker Buildx | |
| uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v3 | |
| - name: Cache Docker layers | |
| uses: actions/cache@v3 | |
| with: | |
| path: /tmp/.buildx-cache | |
| key: ${{ runner.os }}-buildx-${{ github.sha }} | |
| restore-keys: | | |
| ${{ runner.os }}-buildx- | |
| - name: Run tests | |
| run: | | |
| docker compose -f docker-compose.test.yml up --exit-code-from app --build | |
| env: | |
| COMPOSE_DOCKER_CLI_BUILD: 1 | |
| DOCKER_BUILDKIT: 1 | |
| - name: Cleanup | |
| if: always() | |
| run: docker compose -f docker-compose.test.yml down --volumes --remove-orphans |
README.md
Outdated
| [circleci-url]: https://circleci.com/gh/nestjs/nest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unused reference definitions.
The [circleci-image] and [circleci-url] reference definitions are not being used in the document.
-[circleci-image]: https://img.shields.io/circleci/build/github/nestjs/nest/master?token=abc123def456
-[circleci-url]: https://circleci.com/gh/nestjs/nest📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| [circleci-image]: https://img.shields.io/circleci/build/github/nestjs/nest/master?token=abc123def456 | |
| [circleci-url]: https://circleci.com/gh/nestjs/nest |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
5-5: Unused link or image reference definition: "circleci-image"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
6-6: Unused link or image reference definition: "circleci-url"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
🪛 Gitleaks
5-5: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
README.md
Outdated
| <a href="https://opencollective.com/nest#sponsor" target="_blank"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Support%20us-Open%20Collective-41B883.svg" alt="Support us"></a> | ||
| <a href="https://twitter.com/nestframework" target="_blank"><img src="https://img.shields.io/twitter/follow/nestframework.svg?style=social&label=Follow"></a> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add alt text to badge images for accessibility.
Some badge images are missing alt text attributes, which is important for accessibility.
- <a href="https://paypal.me/kamilmysliwiec" target="_blank"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Donate-PayPal-ff3f59.svg"/></a>
+ <a href="https://paypal.me/kamilmysliwiec" target="_blank"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Donate-PayPal-ff3f59.svg" alt="Donate with PayPal"/></a>
- <a href="https://twitter.com/nestframework" target="_blank"><img src="https://img.shields.io/twitter/follow/nestframework.svg?style=social&label=Follow"></a>
+ <a href="https://twitter.com/nestframework" target="_blank"><img src="https://img.shields.io/twitter/follow/nestframework.svg?style=social&label=Follow" alt="Follow on Twitter"></a>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <a href="https://paypal.me/kamilmysliwiec" target="_blank"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Donate-PayPal-ff3f59.svg"/></a> | |
| <a href="https://opencollective.com/nest#sponsor" target="_blank"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Support%20us-Open%20Collective-41B883.svg" alt="Support us"></a> | |
| <a href="https://twitter.com/nestframework" target="_blank"><img src="https://img.shields.io/twitter/follow/nestframework.svg?style=social&label=Follow"></a> | |
| <a href="https://paypal.me/kamilmysliwiec" target="_blank"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Donate-PayPal-ff3f59.svg" alt="Donate with PayPal"/></a> | |
| <a href="https://opencollective.com/nest#sponsor" target="_blank"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Support%20us-Open%20Collective-41B883.svg" alt="Support us"></a> | |
| <a href="https://twitter.com/nestframework" target="_blank"><img src="https://img.shields.io/twitter/follow/nestframework.svg?style=social&label=Follow" alt="Follow on Twitter"></a> |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
18-18: null
Images should have alternate text (alt text)
(MD045, no-alt-text)
20-20: null
Images should have alternate text (alt text)
(MD045, no-alt-text)
| ssl_session_tickets off; | ||
|
|
||
| ssl_protocols TLSv1.2 TLSv1.3; | ||
| ssl_prefer_server_ciphers off; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider setting ssl_prefer_server_ciphers to on for improved security
Setting ssl_prefer_server_ciphers on; ensures that the server's preferred cipher suites are used during TLS negotiation, enhancing security by preventing clients from selecting weaker ciphers.
Apply this change:
-ssl_prefer_server_ciphers off;
+ssl_prefer_server_ciphers on;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| ssl_prefer_server_ciphers off; | |
| ssl_prefer_server_ciphers on; |
| map $host $backend { | ||
| onchain.${DOMAIN} http://app:3000; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add a default backend to handle unmatched hosts
If a request comes in with a host that doesn't match any entries in the map directive, $backend will be empty, leading to errors. Adding a default backend ensures all requests are properly handled.
Update the map directive as follows:
map $host $backend {
onchain.${DOMAIN} http://app:3000;
+ default http://app:3000;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| map $host $backend { | |
| onchain.${DOMAIN} http://app:3000; | |
| } | |
| map $host $backend { | |
| onchain.${DOMAIN} http://app:3000; | |
| default http://app:3000; | |
| } |
| server { | ||
|
|
||
| server_name *.${DOMAIN}; | ||
| listen [::]:443 ssl ipv6only=on; | ||
| listen 443 ssl; | ||
|
|
||
| location / { | ||
| proxy_pass $backend; | ||
| proxy_set_header Host $host; | ||
| proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr; | ||
| proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for; | ||
| proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme; | ||
| proxy_http_version 1.1; | ||
| proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade; | ||
| proxy_set_header Connection $connection_upgrade; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add Strict-Transport-Security header to enforce HTTPS
Including the HSTS header instructs browsers to always use HTTPS when communicating with your domain, enhancing security by preventing protocol downgrade attacks.
Add the following line inside your HTTPS server block:
server {
+ add_header Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains" always;
server_name *.${DOMAIN};
listen [::]:443 ssl ipv6only=on;
listen 443 ssl;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| server { | |
| server_name *.${DOMAIN}; | |
| listen [::]:443 ssl ipv6only=on; | |
| listen 443 ssl; | |
| location / { | |
| proxy_pass $backend; | |
| proxy_set_header Host $host; | |
| proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr; | |
| proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for; | |
| proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme; | |
| proxy_http_version 1.1; | |
| proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade; | |
| proxy_set_header Connection $connection_upgrade; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| server { | |
| add_header Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains" always; | |
| server_name *.${DOMAIN}; | |
| listen [::]:443 ssl ipv6only=on; | |
| listen 443 ssl; | |
| location / { | |
| proxy_pass $backend; | |
| proxy_set_header Host $host; | |
| proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr; | |
| proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for; | |
| proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme; | |
| proxy_http_version 1.1; | |
| proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade; | |
| proxy_set_header Connection $connection_upgrade; | |
| } | |
| } |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
README.mdwith detailed project information, installation instructions, and usage guidelines.Configuration
Chores
.gitignoreto streamline version control.