Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: computing neo4j analytics for just the only latest date! #34
feat: computing neo4j analytics for just the only latest date! #34
Changes from 3 commits
e8c5c01
fddc885
e19a54c
7952525
44d33ad
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove commented-out code
The code for handling
recompute_dates
has been commented out. If this functionality is no longer needed, it's better to remove the code entirely rather than leaving it commented out. This helps maintain code cleanliness and readability.If you think this functionality might be needed in the future, remember that version control systems can be used to retrieve old code if necessary.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Update return type and variable name to reflect single date return
The method now returns only the latest date, but the return type is still
set[float]
and the variable name suggests multiple dates. This inconsistency could lead to confusion or errors in code that uses this method.Consider the following changes:
float
instead of aset[float]
.Also applies to: 130-132
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Centrality Computation Not Restricted to Latest Date
The
compute_network_decentrality
function does not appear to be called withfrom_start=False
, which means it may still be processing historical data contrary to the PR's objective of focusing solely on the latest date.compute_network_decentrality
usefrom_start=False
to ensure only the latest date is considered.Analysis chain
Verify alignment with PR objective and consider test improvements
The commented-out assertion aligns with the PR objective of "computing neo4j analytics for just the only latest date". However, this change raises some concerns:
Test coverage: By removing the assertion for the 'yesterday' date, we're no longer verifying the behavior for historical data. This might lead to undetected regressions in processing older data.
Test setup: The test still creates data for both 'today' and 'yesterday', but only asserts on 'today'. This might be unnecessary and could be simplified.
To ensure that the implementation correctly focuses on the latest date, please run the following script:
Consider the following improvements:
Example refactor:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 103
Script:
Length of output: 99
Script:
Length of output: 5724
Script:
Length of output: 90
Script:
Length of output: 94
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Inconsistent Test Expectations for user2_id Identified
The test references two dates with different coefficients:
coeffs
are1.0
(user2_id should have expected results)coeffs
are0.0
(user2_id is expected to have no results)However,
expected_results_user2
is set to an empty list, which only aligns with Date 167. This discrepancy suggests that the expected results for Date 166 are not being properly validated.Please review and ensure that the test accurately reflects the expected behavior for both dates.
Analysis chain
Clarify the expected behavior for user2_id and overall test strategy.
The change to an empty list for user2_id's expected results is a significant modification. Please clarify:
Consider adding comments explaining the expected behavior for each user, especially for user2_id, to improve test clarity.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 108
Script:
Length of output: 170