Question service #28
Question service #28
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@cyri113 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 17 minutes and 6 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces substantial updates across various services in a NestJS application. Key modifications include the addition of a Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
apps/question-service/src/dto/QuestionText.ts (1)
1-3: LGTM!The
QuestionTextclass is a simple and clear DTO for encapsulating question text data. The class name and property name are descriptive, and the class is exported appropriately.Consider explicitly marking the
textproperty as public for clarity and consistency with TypeScript best practices:export class QuestionText { - text: string; + public text: string; }apps/question-service/test/app.e2e-spec.ts (1)
18-23: Update the expected response message to match the actual functionality.The test case is structured correctly and ensures that the root endpoint is accessible and responds with a 200 status code. However, the asserted response message "Hello World!" seems to be a placeholder.
Please update the expected response message to align with the actual functionality of the endpoint. This will provide more meaningful validation of the endpoint's behavior.
apps/question-service/src/question-service.controller.spec.ts (1)
5-24: LGTM! Consider enabling the commented-out test case.The testing module setup for the
QuestionServiceControllerlooks good and follows NestJS best practices.However, there is a commented-out test case for the
getHellomethod. Consider enabling this test case to ensure the method is properly tested and to prevent potential bugs or regressions.Tools
GitHub Check: lint
[failure] 6-6:
'questionServiceController' is assigned a value but never used
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
Files selected for processing (29)
- Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- apps/bot/src/bot.controller.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/bot/src/bot.module.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/bot/src/bot.service.ts (4 hunks)
- apps/event-store/src/event-store.controller.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/graph-store/src/chat_member/chat_member.controller.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/graph-store/src/edited_message/edited_message.controller.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/graph-store/src/graph-store.module.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/graph-store/src/interceptors/rmq.interceptor.spec.ts (0 hunks)
- apps/graph-store/src/interceptors/rmq.interceptor.ts (0 hunks)
- apps/graph-store/src/message/message.controller.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/graph-store/src/message_reaction/message_reaction.controller.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/question-service/src/dto/QuestionResult.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/question-service/src/dto/QuestionText.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/question-service/src/main.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/question-service/src/question-service.controller.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/question-service/src/question-service.controller.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/question-service/src/question-service.module.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/question-service/src/question-service.service.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/question-service/test/app.e2e-spec.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/question-service/test/jest-e2e.json (1 hunks)
- apps/question-service/tsconfig.app.json (1 hunks)
- docker-compose.yml (3 hunks)
- libs/common/src/config/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/common/src/config/question.config.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/common/src/constants/events.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/common/src/constants/services.ts (1 hunks)
- nest-cli.json (1 hunks)
- package.json (3 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (2)
- apps/graph-store/src/interceptors/rmq.interceptor.spec.ts
- apps/graph-store/src/interceptors/rmq.interceptor.ts
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- apps/event-store/src/event-store.controller.ts
- apps/graph-store/src/graph-store.module.ts
- apps/question-service/test/jest-e2e.json
- apps/question-service/tsconfig.app.json
Additional context used
GitHub Check: lint
apps/question-service/src/question-service.controller.spec.ts
[failure] 6-6:
'questionServiceController' is assigned a value but never used
Biome
apps/question-service/src/question-service.controller.ts
[error] 26-26: Unsafe usage of optional chaining.
If it short-circuits with 'undefined' the evaluation will throw TypeError here:
(lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining)
Additional comments not posted (46)
apps/question-service/src/dto/QuestionResult.ts (1)
1-4: LGTM!The
QuestionResultclass is well-structured and follows TypeScript best practices:
- The class properties are appropriately typed using string literal types and number types.
- The use of string literal types for the
labelproperty ensures type safety and reduces the chances of runtime errors.- The class is exported, allowing it to be imported and used in other parts of the codebase.
Overall, the class provides a clear and structured way to represent the outcome of a question evaluation, facilitating better data handling and type safety within the application.
libs/common/src/config/question.config.ts (1)
1-5: LGTM!The
questionConfigfunction provides a clean and flexible way to configure the question service URI. Using environment variables for configuration is a good practice as it allows for flexibility and security. The function signature usesRecord<string, unknown>as the return type, which is a good way to represent a generic object type.The code changes look good to me.
libs/common/src/config/index.ts (1)
6-6: LGTM! Verify thequestion.configmodule.The new export statement looks good and enhances the module's functionality by integrating the configurations from
question.config.Please ensure that:
- The
question.configmodule exists at the correct path.- It exports the expected configurations without any issues.
You can use the following script to verify:
Verification successful
Verification successful:
question.config.tsexists and exports the expected configuration.The
libs/common/src/config/question.config.tsfile has been verified:
- The file exists in the correct location.
- It contains one export statement as expected.
- The exported
questionConfigfunction returns an object with thequestion.uriconfiguration, which uses an environment variable for flexibility.These changes enhance the module's functionality by integrating the question configuration, allowing for dynamic configuration of the question service URI.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and correctness of the `question.config` module. # Test 1: Check if the `question.config` file exists. Expect: File found. if [ -f "libs/common/src/config/question.config.ts" ] || [ -f "libs/common/src/config/question.config.js" ]; then echo "File libs/common/src/config/question.config exists." else echo "File libs/common/src/config/question.config does not exist." fi # Test 2: Check if the `question.config` module has any export statements. Expect: At least one export statement. exports_count=$(rg --type typescript --type javascript -c $'export' libs/common/src/config/question.config) if [ "$exports_count" -gt 0 ]; then echo "File libs/common/src/config/question.config contains $exports_count export statements." else echo "File libs/common/src/config/question.config does not contain any export statements." fiLength of output: 588
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and correctness of the `question.config` module using alternative methods. # Test 1: Confirm the existence of the question.config.ts file echo "Test 1: Checking file existence" if [ -f "libs/common/src/config/question.config.ts" ]; then echo "File libs/common/src/config/question.config.ts exists." else echo "File libs/common/src/config/question.config.ts does not exist." fi # Test 2: Check for export statements using grep instead of rg echo "Test 2: Checking for export statements" export_count=$(grep -c "export" libs/common/src/config/question.config.ts) if [ "$export_count" -gt 0 ]; then echo "File libs/common/src/config/question.config.ts contains $export_count export statement(s)." else echo "File libs/common/src/config/question.config.ts does not contain any export statements." fi # Test 3: Display the content of the file for manual verification echo "Test 3: Displaying file content for manual verification" echo "Content of libs/common/src/config/question.config.ts:" cat libs/common/src/config/question.config.tsLength of output: 1011
libs/common/src/constants/services.ts (1)
14-17: LGTM!The addition of the
TGQuestionServiceconfiguration to theServicesconstant is consistent with the existing service definitions and follows the established naming convention.This change sets the stage for integrating the
TGQuestionServiceinto the application. The actual implementation and usage of the service should be reviewed separately to ensure it aligns with the application architecture and requirements.apps/question-service/src/main.ts (1)
5-12: LGTM!The
bootstrapfunction correctly sets up a NestJS microservice for the Question Service. It follows the standard pattern, uses theRmqServiceto connect to RabbitMQ, targets the correct queue, and starts all microservices. This setup is crucial for the functionality of the Question Service within the broader system architecture.Dockerfile (1)
17-17: LGTM!The addition of the build command for the
question-serviceis consistent with the existing build commands and follows the same pattern. This change ensures that thequestion-serviceis built and included in the production image, which is necessary for the application to function correctly in its deployed environment.libs/common/src/constants/events.ts (1)
19-21: LGTM!The new constant
TelegramActionwith the propertySEND_MESSAGEis a good addition. It provides a clear and centralized way to reference the action of sending messages, which can improve code readability and maintainability.Exporting the constant is also a good practice for reusability.
apps/question-service/src/question-service.service.ts (3)
1-5: LGTM!The imports are correctly used to bring in the required dependencies.
7-8: LGTM!The class declaration and the
@Injectable()decorator are correctly used to define a service that can be managed by the NestJS dependency injection system.
9-16: LGTM!The constructor correctly uses dependency injection to get instances of
HttpServiceandConfigService, and sets theuriproperty using thequestion.uriconfiguration value.apps/question-service/test/app.e2e-spec.ts (2)
1-4: LGTM!The imports are correct and necessary for setting up the testing module using NestJS and Supertest.
6-16: LGTM!The testing module is set up correctly by importing the
QuestionServiceModule, and the Nest application instance is created and initialized properly for testing purposes.apps/bot/src/bot.module.ts (4)
12-12: LGTM!The import statement for
BotControlleris correctly written and follows the naming convention.
23-23: Registering the question service aligns with the PR objective.The registration of
TGQuestionServicewith theRmqModulealigns with the PR objective of adding a question service. This will make the service available for injection in the controllers and providers of this module.
25-25: Adding the controller to the module is correct.Including
BotControllerin thecontrollersarray of the@Moduledecorator is the correct way to make the controller part of the module. This allows the controller to handle incoming requests related to the bot functionality.
28-28: Adding an empty line after the class definition is a good practice.Although not functionally necessary, adding an empty line after the class definition of
BotModuleimproves the readability of the code and aligns with many style guide recommendations.apps/question-service/src/question-service.module.ts (4)
1-12: LGTM!The module imports are well-organized and provide the necessary functionality for the
QuestionServiceModule. The use of a shared library@app/commonfor custom modules and configurations promotes code reuse and maintainability.
16-20: LGTM!The
ConfigModuleis correctly configured to load and validate the necessary configurations. Setting the configurations as global ensures they are accessible throughout the application. The use ofschemaConfigfor validation and loadingrmqConfigandquestionConfigseparately allows for a modular and maintainable configuration setup.
23-23: LGTM!Registering
RmqModulewithServices.TelegramBotservice enables theQuestionServiceModuleto communicate with the Telegram bot service using RabbitMQ. This setup allows for loose coupling between services and enables asynchronous communication, which is a good architectural practice.
14-28: LGTM!The
QuestionServiceModuleis declared correctly as a NestJS module. It imports the necessary modules and declares the related controller and service, encapsulating the question service functionality within a logical boundary. The module structure follows the NestJS best practices and promotes a modular and maintainable architecture.apps/bot/src/bot.controller.ts (2)
7-11: LGTM!The
MessagePayloadinterface accurately represents the structure of the payload for thesendMessagemethod. The property types are appropriate for their intended use.
13-25: LGTM!The
BotControllerclass is well-structured and follows best practices for a NestJS controller. It correctly uses decorators, dependency injection, and message patterns to handle incoming messages and delegate the sending logic to the service layer. ThesendMessagemethod is implemented correctly, accepting a payload of typeMessagePayloadand destructuring it to extract the required properties before calling thesendMessagemethod of theBotService.nest-cli.json (1)
49-56: LGTM!The addition of the "question-service" configuration follows the established conventions and mirrors the structure of existing service configurations. This change enables the proper integration of the "question-service" into the application architecture, facilitating its development and deployment within the NestJS framework.
apps/question-service/src/question-service.controller.ts (1)
12-47: LGTM! The class is well-structured and follows the NestJS controller pattern.The
QuestionServiceControllerclass is designed to handle incoming messages from a Telegram bot using the@MessagePatterndecorator. It processes the message text using theQuestionServiceServiceand sends a formatted response back to the Telegram chat. The use of decorators and the overall structure of the class adhere to the NestJS best practices for building microservices.Tools
Biome
[error] 26-26: Unsafe usage of optional chaining.
If it short-circuits with 'undefined' the evaluation will throw TypeError here:
(lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining)
apps/bot/src/bot.service.ts (4)
5-7: LGTM!The new imports from the
grammylibrary are correctly specified and follow the proper syntax. The imported entities are used in the code changes below.
17-18: LGTM!The new dependency
tgQuestionClientis correctly injected into theBotServiceconstructor using the@Injectdecorator and theServices.TGQuestionService.nametoken. The dependency is declared as a private readonly property of typeClientProxyand is used in the code changes below to emit events to theTGQuestionService.
34-37: LGTM!The new condition correctly checks if the message sender is not a bot using the
is_botproperty of thefromobject. ThetgQuestionClientis used to emit the event to theTGQuestionServiceonly if the condition is true. Thereturnstatement is added to exit the event handler after emitting the event.
47-56: LGTM!The new method
sendMessageis correctly defined with the appropriate parameters and return type. The method uses thebot.api.sendMessagemethod to send the message, which is the correct way to send messages using thegrammylibrary. The method logs the sent message details using thelogger.logmethod, which is a good practice for tracking and debugging purposes.apps/graph-store/src/message_reaction/message_reaction.controller.ts (2)
13-13: LGTM!The import statement for
EventsInterceptoris syntactically correct and aligns with the change in interception strategy mentioned in the summary.
16-16: LGTM!The
@UseInterceptors(EventsInterceptor)decorator is correctly applied to theMessageReactionControllerclass, reflecting the change in interception strategy mentioned in the summary.apps/graph-store/src/edited_message/edited_message.controller.ts (3)
16-16: LGTM!The import statement for
EventsInterceptoris syntactically correct and the import path is valid.
31-31: LGTM!The formatting change in the constructor improves the readability of the code and does not impact the functionality.
19-19: Verify the behavior of the new interceptor.The change from
RmqInterceptortoEventsInterceptoris significant and may impact how events are processed or logged within the application.Please ensure that the new interceptor handles the events as expected and doesn't introduce any bugs or performance issues. Consider running the following verification steps:
- Review the implementation of
EventsInterceptorto understand how it differs fromRmqInterceptor.- Test the edited message functionality thoroughly to ensure that the events are intercepted and handled correctly.
- Monitor the application logs to verify that the events are being logged as expected.
- Perform load testing to ensure that the new interceptor doesn't introduce any performance issues.
Verification successful
Verified: EventsInterceptor is correctly implemented and used.
The change from
RmqInterceptortoEventsInterceptoris consistent with the codebase. TheEventsInterceptoris properly implemented inlibs/common/src/rmq/interceptors/events.interceptor.tsand is used consistently across multiple controllers in different services. It utilizes theRmqServicefor message acknowledgment, which is the expected behavior for RabbitMQ message processing.Key observations:
- The interceptor is located in the common module, making it reusable across the application.
- It's applied to various controllers, including
EditedMessageController, ensuring consistent message handling.- The implementation uses
RmqServicefor acknowledging messages, maintaining the required RabbitMQ functionality.This change appears to be a refactoring or renaming that maintains the same functionality as the previous
RmqInterceptor. The extensive use of RabbitMQ configurations and services throughout the codebase further supports this conclusion.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and usage of EventsInterceptor. # Test 1: Search for the EventsInterceptor class definition. # Expect: The class should be defined in the @app/common module. fd EventsInterceptor.ts @app/common --exec cat | less # Test 2: Search for the usage of EventsInterceptor in the codebase. # Expect: The interceptor should be used consistently across the application. rg --type typescript -C 5 $'@UseInterceptors\(EventsInterceptor\)' # Test 3: Search for the RMQ_EVENTS constant in the codebase. # Expect: The constant should be used in the EventsInterceptor class. rg --type typescript -C 5 RMQ_EVENTSLength of output: 331
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and usage of EventsInterceptor and RMQ_EVENTS # Search for the EventsInterceptor file echo "Searching for EventsInterceptor file:" fd EventsInterceptor.ts # Display the content of the EventsInterceptor file echo -e "\nContent of EventsInterceptor file:" fd EventsInterceptor.ts -x cat {} # Search for usage of EventsInterceptor in the codebase echo -e "\nUsage of EventsInterceptor:" rg -C 3 "@UseInterceptors\(EventsInterceptor\)" # Search for RMQ_EVENTS constant in the codebase echo -e "\nUsage of RMQ_EVENTS constant:" rg -C 3 "RMQ_EVENTS"Length of output: 4737
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Further investigate EventsInterceptor and RabbitMQ configurations # Search for the events.interceptor.ts file echo "Searching for events.interceptor.ts file:" fd events.interceptor.ts # Display the content of the events.interceptor.ts file echo -e "\nContent of events.interceptor.ts file:" fd events.interceptor.ts -x cat {} # Search for RabbitMQ-related constants and configurations echo -e "\nRabbitMQ-related constants and configurations:" rg -C 3 -e "RabbitMQ" -e "RABBITMQ" -e "rmq" -e "amqp" # Search for any Interceptor-related imports in the common module echo -e "\nInterceptor-related imports in common module:" rg -C 3 "import.*Interceptor" apps/commonLength of output: 25579
package.json (3)
23-23: LGTM!The addition of
@nestjs/axiosdependency is a good choice for enhancing the HTTP request handling capabilities within the NestJS framework. The version^3.0.3is a stable release and should not cause any compatibility issues.
32-32: LGTM!The addition of
axiosdependency is a good choice for making HTTP requests outside of the NestJS context. This change provides flexibility to make HTTP requests independently of the NestJS framework. The version^1.7.7is a stable release and should not cause any compatibility issues.
33-33: LGTM!The update of
grammydependency from version^1.22.4to^1.30.0is a good choice for potentially improving functionality and performance of the Telegram bot framework. This change reflects an enhancement in the application's dependency management. The version^1.30.0is a stable release and should not cause any compatibility issues.docker-compose.yml (5)
Line range hint
1-17: LGTM!The changes to the
telegram-commonservice configuration, including the build target update and volume addition, align with the PR objective of transitioning to a more development-focused setup. These modifications will facilitate easier access to local files during development.
71-71: Improved healthcheck for theneo4jservice.The updated healthcheck test command using
wgetto check the availability of the Neo4j web interface is a more reliable method compared to the previous command. This change enhances the robustness of the healthcheck mechanism for theneo4jservice.
78-92: Updated command format and added new service.The changes to the command format for the
telegram-bot,telegram-events, andtelegram-graphservices, along with the introduction of the newtelegram-questionservice using the development command format, align with the PR objectives of transitioning to a more development-focused setup and enhancing functionality.
104-104: Added volume for Neo4j plugins.The addition of the
neo4j_pluginsvolume provides a dedicated storage space for Neo4j plugins, aligning with the Neo4j service configuration that specifies the use of "apoc" and "graph-data-science" plugins. This change promotes modularity and easier management of Neo4j extensions.
94-98: Verify the integration and security of the external question service.The addition of the
question-service-extservice, which uses an image from a GitHub container registry and exposes port 80, suggests an integration of an external question service into the existing architecture.Please ensure that:
- The integration of this external service aligns with the overall system design and requirements.
- The image sourced from the GitHub container registry is trusted and secure.
- Proper security measures are in place to protect the exposed endpoint of this service.
Run the following script to verify the integration and security aspects:
apps/graph-store/src/message/message.controller.ts (3)
16-16: LGTM!The import statement for
EventsInterceptoris syntactically correct and follows the project's conventions.
31-31: LGTM!The reformatting of the constructor improves readability without impacting functionality.
19-19: Verify the impact of the interceptor change.The usage of the
@UseInterceptors(EventsInterceptor)decorator is syntactically correct and follows the NestJS framework conventions.However, please ensure that the switch from
RmqInterceptortoEventsInterceptordoes not introduce any unintended side effects or break existing functionality related to message handling.Consider running the following script to analyze the usage of the
EventsInterceptoracross the codebase:Verification successful
Interceptor change verified and consistently implemented
The switch from
RmqInterceptortoEventsInterceptorhas been successfully verified across the codebase. Key findings:
EventsInterceptoris consistently used in multiple services (bot, event-store, graph-store, question-service) with the@UseInterceptorsdecorator on controller classes.- Message handling logic using
@MessagePattern(UpdateEvent.MESSAGE)remains intact in relevant services.- No traces of
RmqInterceptorwere found, confirming its complete replacement.This change appears to be an intentional, system-wide update to the event handling mechanism. The consistent implementation across different services suggests that the impact has been carefully considered and applied uniformly.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage and impact of the EventsInterceptor. # Test 1: Search for the EventsInterceptor usage. # Expect: Usage in relevant message handling contexts. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'EventsInterceptor' # Test 2: Search for message handling logic. # Expect: No breaking changes or unintended side effects. rg --type typescript -A 10 $'@MessagePattern\(UpdateEvent\.MESSAGE\)'Length of output: 186
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage and impact of the EventsInterceptor using grep. # Test 1: Search for the EventsInterceptor usage. # Expect: Usage in relevant message handling contexts. grep -r -n -A 5 "EventsInterceptor" . # Test 2: Search for message handling logic. # Expect: No breaking changes or unintended side effects. grep -r -n -A 10 "@MessagePattern(UpdateEvent.MESSAGE)" . # Test 3: Search for RmqInterceptor usage to compare with EventsInterceptor. # Expect: Possible remnants of previous implementation or complete replacement. grep -r -n -A 5 "RmqInterceptor" .Length of output: 12662
apps/graph-store/src/chat_member/chat_member.controller.ts (2)
28-28: LGTM!The decorator change aligns with the import change. As mentioned in the previous comment, ensure that the replacement of
RmqInterceptorwithEventsInterceptordoes not introduce any unintended side effects or break existing functionality.
5-5: Verify the impact of replacingRmqInterceptorwithEventsInterceptor.The import statement is correct. However, ensure that the replacement of
RmqInterceptorwithEventsInterceptordoes not introduce any unintended side effects or break existing functionality.Run the following script to verify the usage of
RmqInterceptorandEventsInterceptor:Verification successful
Verified:
EventsInterceptorreplacement is correct and consistentThe replacement of
RmqInterceptorwithEventsInterceptorin theChatMemberControlleris verified to be correct and consistent with the rest of the codebase. Key findings:
RmqInterceptoris no longer used anywhere in the codebase.EventsInterceptoris widely used across multiple controllers in different services.- The import statement and usage in
chat_member.controller.tsmatch other controllers' implementations.This change aligns with the overall architecture and doesn't introduce any inconsistencies or unintended side effects.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `RmqInterceptor` and `EventsInterceptor`. # Test 1: Search for the usage of `RmqInterceptor`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'RmqInterceptor' # Test 2: Search for the usage of `EventsInterceptor`. Expect: Only occurrences in the `ChatMemberController` class. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'EventsInterceptor'Length of output: 158
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage and definitions of `RmqInterceptor` and `EventsInterceptor`. # Test 1: Search for the usage of `RmqInterceptor`. echo "Searching for RmqInterceptor usage:" rg --glob '*.ts' -A 5 'RmqInterceptor' # Test 2: Search for the definition of `RmqInterceptor`. echo "Searching for RmqInterceptor definition:" rg --glob '*.ts' -A 5 'class RmqInterceptor' # Test 3: Search for the usage of `EventsInterceptor`. echo "Searching for EventsInterceptor usage:" rg --glob '*.ts' -A 5 'EventsInterceptor' # Test 4: Search for the definition of `EventsInterceptor`. echo "Searching for EventsInterceptor definition:" rg --glob '*.ts' -A 5 'class EventsInterceptor' # Test 5: Search for the import of `EventsInterceptor` in chat_member.controller.ts echo "Searching for EventsInterceptor import in chat_member.controller.ts:" rg --glob 'chat_member.controller.ts' 'import.*EventsInterceptor'Length of output: 10755
| test(text: string): Promise<AxiosResponse<QuestionResult>> { | ||
| return this.httpService.axiosRef.post(this.uri, { | ||
| text, | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling and logging.
The test method correctly sends a POST request to the uri with the text parameter in the request body, and returns a promise that resolves to an AxiosResponse containing a QuestionResult.
However, consider adding error handling and logging to improve the robustness and observability of the service.
Here's an example of how you can add error handling and logging:
import { Logger } from '@nestjs/common';
// ...
@Injectable()
export class QuestionServiceService {
private readonly logger = new Logger(QuestionServiceService.name);
// ...
async test(text: string): Promise<AxiosResponse<QuestionResult>> {
try {
const response = await this.httpService.axiosRef.post(this.uri, {
text,
});
this.logger.log(`Received response from ${this.uri}: ${JSON.stringify(response.data)}`);
return response;
} catch (error) {
this.logger.error(`Error sending request to ${this.uri}: ${error.message}`, error.stack);
throw error;
}
}
}| import { QuestionServiceService } from './question-service.service'; | ||
|
|
||
| describe('QuestionServiceController', () => { | ||
| let questionServiceController: QuestionServiceController; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Address the unused variable.
The questionServiceController variable is assigned a value but never used, as indicated by the static analysis hint. This is likely due to the commented-out test case.
Consider one of the following solutions:
- Enable the commented-out test case to utilize the
questionServiceControllervariable. - If the test case is not needed, remove the variable declaration to keep the code clean.
-let questionServiceController: QuestionServiceController;Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| let questionServiceController: QuestionServiceController; |
Tools
GitHub Check: lint
[failure] 6-6:
'questionServiceController' is assigned a value but never used
| message_id, | ||
| text: msg, | ||
| chat: { id: chat_id }, | ||
| } = ctx.update?.message; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the unsafe usage of optional chaining.
The static analysis tool has correctly identified an unsafe usage of optional chaining on line 26. If ctx.update or ctx.update.message is undefined, accessing properties on it will throw a TypeError.
To fix this, you can use optional chaining and nullish coalescing together to provide a default value when the property is undefined:
- } = ctx.update?.message;
+ } = ctx.update?.message ?? {};This way, if ctx.update or ctx.update.message is undefined, an empty object will be used as a default value, preventing the TypeError.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| } = ctx.update?.message; | |
| } = ctx.update?.message ?? {}; |
Tools
Biome
[error] 26-26: Unsafe usage of optional chaining.
If it short-circuits with 'undefined' the evaluation will throw TypeError here:
(lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
apps/question/src/dto/QuestionText.ts (1)
1-3: LGTM!The
QuestionTextclass follows a simple and clear DTO pattern, encapsulating the text content of a question. The structure and syntax are correct.Consider marking the
textproperty asreadonlyif immutability is desired:export class QuestionText { - text: string; + readonly text: string; }This ensures that the
textproperty can only be assigned during initialization and cannot be modified afterwards, promoting immutability and reducing the risk of unintended mutations.apps/question/test/app.e2e-spec.ts (1)
6-24: Add more test cases to cover the actual functionality.The test suite is set up correctly and ensures that the basic routing and response functionality of the
QuestionControlleris working as expected. However, it only tests a single endpoint with a hardcoded response.Consider adding more test cases to cover the actual functionality of the
QuestionControllerand test other endpoints as well. This will ensure that theQuestionControlleris thoroughly tested and working as expected.apps/question/src/question.controller.spec.ts (1)
19-24: Add more meaningful test cases and fix the typo in the commented-out expectation.The current test case is a placeholder that only checks if the
questionControllerinstance is truthy. Consider adding more meaningful test cases that cover the functionality of theQuestionController.Also, the commented-out expectation has a typo in the class name. It should be
questionControllerinstead ofquestionServiceController.Apply this diff to fix the typo in the commented-out expectation:
-// expect(questionServiceController.message ()).toBe('Hello World!'); +// expect(questionController.message()).toBe('Hello World!');apps/question/src/question.controller.ts (1)
21-49: Consider adding error handling.The
messagemethod could benefit from error handling to catch and log any potential errors during processing. This will help diagnose issues and prevent unhandled exceptions.Wrap the core logic inside a try-catch block:
@MessagePattern(UpdateEvent.MESSAGE) async message(@Payload() ctx: Context): Promise<void> { try { // existing logic } catch (error) { this.logger.error(`Error processing message ${message_id} from ${chat_id}: ${error.message}`); // optionally, send an error response back to the user } }Tools
Biome
[error] 26-26: Unsafe usage of optional chaining.
If it short-circuits with 'undefined' the evaluation will throw TypeError here:
(lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining)
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (13)
- apps/bot/src/main.ts (0 hunks)
- apps/question/src/dto/QuestionResult.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/question/src/dto/QuestionText.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/question/src/main.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/question/src/question.controller.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/question/src/question.controller.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/question/src/question.module.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/question/src/question.service.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/question/test/app.e2e-spec.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/question/test/jest-e2e.json (1 hunks)
- apps/question/tsconfig.app.json (1 hunks)
- docker-compose.yml (3 hunks)
- nest-cli.json (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)
- apps/bot/src/main.ts
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- docker-compose.yml
Additional context used
Biome
apps/question/src/question.controller.ts
[error] 26-26: Unsafe usage of optional chaining.
If it short-circuits with 'undefined' the evaluation will throw TypeError here:
(lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining)
Additional comments not posted (14)
apps/question/src/dto/QuestionResult.ts (1)
1-4: LGTM!The
QuestionResultclass is well-structured and provides a clear representation of a question result. The use of a union type forlabelensures type safety and restricts the possible values to 'QUESTION' or 'STATEMENT'. Thescoreproperty being of typenumberis appropriate for representing a numeric score value.Exporting the class makes it accessible for use in other parts of the application, promoting code reuse and maintainability.
apps/question/test/jest-e2e.json (1)
1-9: LGTM!The Jest configuration settings are appropriate for E2E testing in a TypeScript environment. The settings ensure that only relevant test files are executed during testing and that TypeScript and JavaScript files are compiled before running the tests.
apps/question/tsconfig.app.json (1)
1-16: LGTM!The TypeScript configuration for the
apps/questionapplication looks good:
- Extending the base configuration at
../../tsconfig.jsonallows for sharing common settings across projects.- Disabling declaration generation with
"declaration": falseis appropriate for an application project.- Setting the output directory to
../../dist/apps/questionkeeps the build output organized.- Including all TypeScript files in the
srcdirectory ensures all relevant files are compiled.- Excluding
node_modules,dist,test, and**/*spec.tsprevents unnecessary files from being compiled.The configuration follows best practices and is consistent with a standard TypeScript application setup.
apps/question/src/main.ts (1)
5-12: LGTM!The
bootstrapfunction follows the recommended practices for setting up a NestJS application with microservices:
- It creates an instance of the NestJS application using the
QuestionModule.- It retrieves an instance of
RmqServiceand uses it to configure a microservice connection based on a specified queue for theTGQuestionService.- The application then starts all microservices, allowing it to handle incoming messages through the configured RabbitMQ service.
This setup is crucial for enabling microservice communication within the application architecture.
apps/question/src/question.service.ts (2)
7-23: LGTM!The
QuestionServiceclass has a clear purpose and follows best practices:
- It adheres to the single responsibility principle by focusing on handling HTTP requests related to questions.
- It leverages dependency injection for configuration and HTTP handling, promoting loose coupling and testability.
- It is properly annotated with
@Injectable(), making it available for dependency injection.
18-22: LGTM!The
testmethod is implemented correctly:
- It has a clear purpose of making a POST request with the provided text.
- It uses the
HttpServicefrom NestJS to make the request, which is a good practice.- The return type is properly annotated, providing clarity on the expected response.
apps/question/test/app.e2e-spec.ts (1)
1-4: LGTM!The necessary modules are imported correctly for setting up the testing module and making HTTP requests to the application.
apps/question/src/question.module.ts (4)
1-12: LGTM!The imports are relevant and necessary for the module. The code segment looks good.
14-24: LGTM!The
QuestionModuledefinition looks good. The imports, configurations, and module registrations are set up correctly.
25-26: LGTM!The
QuestionControllerandQuestionServicedeclarations are correct. They will handle the incoming requests and business logic related to questions.
27-28: LGTM!The
QuestionModuleclass is exported correctly. The code segment looks good.apps/question/src/question.controller.spec.ts (1)
1-3: LGTM!The imports are correct and necessary for setting up the testing module.
nest-cli.json (1)
48-56: LGTM!The addition of the "question" service configuration in the
nest-cli.jsonfile follows the established structure and pattern of other service configurations. This change enables the proper integration and utilization of the "question" service within the NestJS framework, facilitating its development and deployment as part of the application architecture.The configuration specifies the necessary details, such as the service type, root directory, entry file, source root, and TypeScript configuration path, ensuring consistency and compatibility with the existing setup.
Overall, this is a well-structured and beneficial addition to the project configuration.
apps/question/src/question.controller.ts (1)
21-49: The method implementation looks good overall.The
messagemethod follows a clear flow of receiving a message, processing it, constructing a response, and sending it back. The use of theQuestionServiceto process the message text and theClientProxyto send the response back to the Telegram bot is a good approach.Tools
Biome
[error] 26-26: Unsafe usage of optional chaining.
If it short-circuits with 'undefined' the evaluation will throw TypeError here:
(lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining)
| questionController = app.get<QuestionServiceController>( | ||
| QuestionServiceController, | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the typo in the class name.
There is a typo in the class name used to retrieve the questionController instance. It should be QuestionController instead of QuestionServiceController.
Apply this diff to fix the typo:
-questionController = app.get<QuestionServiceController>(
- QuestionServiceController,
-);
+questionController = app.get<QuestionController>(
+ QuestionController,
+);Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| questionController = app.get<QuestionServiceController>( | |
| QuestionServiceController, | |
| ); | |
| questionController = app.get<QuestionController>( | |
| QuestionController, | |
| ); |
| message_id, | ||
| text: msg, | ||
| chat: { id: chat_id }, | ||
| } = ctx.update?.message; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the unsafe usage of optional chaining.
The static analysis tool has flagged the use of optional chaining at line 26 as potentially unsafe. If ctx.update is undefined, it will lead to a runtime error.
To fix this, add a null check before accessing ctx.update.message:
- } = ctx.update?.message;
+ } = ctx.update?.message || {};Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| } = ctx.update?.message; | |
| } = ctx.update?.message || {}; |
Tools
Biome
[error] 26-26: Unsafe usage of optional chaining.
If it short-circuits with 'undefined' the evaluation will throw TypeError here:
(lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/question/src/question.controller.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/common/src/rmq/interceptors/events.interceptor.spec.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/question/src/question.controller.spec.ts
Additional comments not posted (1)
libs/common/src/rmq/interceptors/events.interceptor.spec.ts (1)
29-31: LGTM!This is a good sanity check to ensure the interceptor is properly instantiated and defined.
| // it('should call ack method of RmqService when intercepting', () => { | ||
| // const mockContext = { | ||
| // switchToRpc: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(), | ||
| // getContext: jest.fn().mockReturnValue({ | ||
| // getChannelRef: jest.fn(), | ||
| // getMessage: jest.fn(), | ||
| // }), | ||
| // } as unknown as ExecutionContext; | ||
| // const mockCallHandler = { | ||
| // handle: jest.fn().mockReturnValue(of(null)), // Mock returning an observable | ||
| // } as CallHandler; | ||
|
|
||
| // // Intercept the call | ||
| // interceptor.intercept(mockContext, mockCallHandler); | ||
|
|
||
| // // You can assert that the ack method is called synchronously | ||
|
|
||
| // // If you want to assert behavior from the observable, you can subscribe to it | ||
| // // and add your assertions inside the subscribe block | ||
| // mockCallHandler.handle().subscribe({ | ||
| // next: () => { | ||
| // // Assert behavior here | ||
| // }, | ||
| // error: () => { | ||
| // // Handle error if needed | ||
| // }, | ||
| // complete: () => { | ||
| // // Handle completion if needed | ||
| // expect(rmqService.ack).toHaveBeenCalled(); | ||
| // }, | ||
| // }); | ||
| // }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Complete and enable the commented-out test case.
This test case provides a good structure for validating the interceptor's behavior when processing messages. However, it is currently incomplete and commented out.
Please complete the test case by:
- Uncomment the test case.
- Add the necessary assertions to validate the
ackmethod is called on theRmqService. - Handle any errors or completions appropriately.
Enabling this test case will help ensure the interceptor's interaction with the message queue service is thoroughly validated.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
QuestionServicefor handling Telegram bot interactions.BotControllerto manage messaging events.telegram-questionservice for improved bot capabilities.TGQuestionServicefor dedicated handling of TG questions.Bug Fixes
Chores
Documentation