Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix broken doi/zenodo link #32

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2024
Merged

Conversation

freddie-freeloader
Copy link
Contributor

Hey!

I found a broken link in the README and replaced it with the DOI/zenodo link from the badge.

Not sure whether this is the proper replacement -- this PR is mainly about reporting the broken link 😉 .

Kind regards from Berlin,
Jonas

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 72.02%. Comparing base (6b79d76) to head (c14e124).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #32   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   72.02%   72.02%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines         579      579           
=======================================
  Hits          417      417           
  Misses        162      162           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 72.02% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Trybnetic
Copy link
Owner

Thanks Jonas for spotting and correcting that. Not sure how this (not even existing) DOI ended up there..

Greetings from Tromsø!

@Trybnetic Trybnetic merged commit 79b8384 into Trybnetic:main Oct 23, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants