Conversation
[Terraform Plan Summary]
Plan OutputTerraform used the selected providers to generate the following execution
plan. Resource actions are indicated with the following symbols:
+ create
Terraform will perform the following actions:
# aws_inspector2_delegated_admin_account.prod_account will be created
+ resource "aws_inspector2_delegated_admin_account" "prod_account" {
+ account_id = "502676416967"
+ id = (known after apply)
+ relationship_status = (known after apply)
}
Plan: 1 to add, 0 to change, 0 to destroy.Plan Error (if any) |
[Terraform Plan Summary]
Plan OutputTerraform used the selected providers to generate the following execution
plan. Resource actions are indicated with the following symbols:
+ create
Terraform will perform the following actions:
# aws_inspector2_delegated_admin_account.this will be created
+ resource "aws_inspector2_delegated_admin_account" "this" {
+ account_id = "433331841346"
+ id = (known after apply)
+ relationship_status = (known after apply)
}
Plan: 1 to add, 0 to change, 0 to destroy.Plan Error (if any) |
[Terraform Plan Summary]
Plan Output(no changes or output empty)Plan Error (if any) |
[Terraform Plan Summary]
Plan OutputNo changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.Plan Error (if any) |
💰 Infracost reportMonthly estimate generatedThis comment will be updated when code changes. |
[Terraform Plan Summary]
Plan Output(no changes or output empty)Plan Error (if any) |
[Terraform Plan Summary]
Plan OutputTerraform used the selected providers to generate the following execution
plan. Resource actions are indicated with the following symbols:
+ create
Terraform will perform the following actions:
# aws_inspector2_delegated_admin_account.this will be created
+ resource "aws_inspector2_delegated_admin_account" "this" {
+ account_id = "433331841346"
+ id = (known after apply)
+ relationship_status = (known after apply)
}
Plan: 1 to add, 0 to change, 0 to destroy.Plan Error (if any) |
[Terraform Plan Summary]
Plan OutputTerraform used the selected providers to generate the following execution
plan. Resource actions are indicated with the following symbols:
+ create
Terraform will perform the following actions:
# aws_inspector2_delegated_admin_account.prod_account will be created
+ resource "aws_inspector2_delegated_admin_account" "prod_account" {
+ account_id = "502676416967"
+ id = (known after apply)
+ relationship_status = (known after apply)
}
Plan: 1 to add, 0 to change, 0 to destroy.Plan Error (if any) |
[Terraform Plan Summary]
Plan OutputTerraform used the selected providers to generate the following execution
plan. Resource actions are indicated with the following symbols:
~ update in-place
Terraform will perform the following actions:
# aws_lambda_function.inspector_slack_notification will be updated in-place
~ resource "aws_lambda_function" "inspector_slack_notification" {
id = "inspector_slack_notification"
~ last_modified = "2025-07-24T04:35:03.737+0000" -> (known after apply)
~ source_code_hash = "BnYLp/FUDSn+4mXnIsz47/0aAZJFUTrZ2sf78C8ZMGQ=" -> "BTE6zEU/p6MoZIzCBAMrvPZ7KuoETdkUlIAnrXUX4JU="
tags = {}
# (21 unchanged attributes hidden)
~ environment {
~ variables = {
# Warning: this attribute value will be marked as sensitive and will not
# display in UI output after applying this change.
~ "SLACK_WEBHOOK_URL" = (sensitive value)
}
}
# (3 unchanged blocks hidden)
}
Plan: 0 to add, 1 to change, 0 to destroy.Plan Error (if any) |
[Terraform Plan Summary]
Plan OutputNo changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.Plan Error (if any) |
imyourhopeee
approved these changes
Jul 29, 2025
Contributor
imyourhopeee
left a comment
imyourhopeee
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
inspector 스캔을 위해 inspectori, iam, lambda 등 설정 확인했습니다.
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#️⃣ Related Issues
#55
📝 Work Summary
AMI로 만들어진 서버의 runtime 환경의 보안 문제를 해결하기 위해 Inspector 스캔을 통해 로그 수집
수집된 로그를 통해 취약점이 발견된 경우 최신 보안 패치가 적용된 AMI를 빌드하여 후속 조치가 이루어질 수 있도록 파이프라인 구축
EC2 서버를 스캔하여 취약점이 감지되면 EventBridge를 통해 Lambda가 slack에 취약점 경고를 보내 담당자가 조치할 수 있는 환경 구성