Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🚨 [security] Update activestorage 6.1.7.4 → 6.1.7.7 (patch) #218

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

depfu[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@depfu depfu bot commented Feb 25, 2024

👉 This PR is queued up to get rebased by Depfu


🚨 Your current dependencies have known security vulnerabilities 🚨

This dependency update fixes known security vulnerabilities. Please see the details below and assess their impact carefully. We recommend to merge and deploy this as soon as possible!


Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

↗️ activestorage (indirect, 6.1.7.4 → 6.1.7.7) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Possible Sensitive Session Information Leak in Active Storage

There is a possible sensitive session information leak in Active Storage.
By default, Active Storage sends a Set-Cookie header along with the user’s
session cookie when serving blobs. It also sets Cache-Control to public.
Certain proxies may cache the Set-Cookie, leading to an information leak.

This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-26144.

Versions Affected: >= 5.2.0, < 7.1.0 Not affected: < 5.2.0, >= 7.1.0 Fixed Versions: 7.0.8.1, 6.1.7.7

Impact

A proxy which chooses to caches this request can cause users to share
sessions. This may include a user receiving an attacker’s session or vice
versa.

This was patched in 7.1.0 but not previously identified as a security
vulnerability.

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the
workarounds immediately.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Upgrade to Rails 7.1.X, or configure caching proxies not to cache the
Set-Cookie headers.

Release Notes

6.1.7.7 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

6.1.7.6 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

6.1.7.5 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

✳️ actionpack (6.1.7.4 → 6.1.7.7) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Possible Sensitive Session Information Leak in Active Storage

There is a possible sensitive session information leak in Active Storage.
By default, Active Storage sends a Set-Cookie header along with the user’s
session cookie when serving blobs. It also sets Cache-Control to public.
Certain proxies may cache the Set-Cookie, leading to an information leak.

This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-26144.

Versions Affected: >= 5.2.0, < 7.1.0 Not affected: < 5.2.0, >= 7.1.0 Fixed Versions: 7.0.8.1, 6.1.7.7

Impact

A proxy which chooses to caches this request can cause users to share
sessions. This may include a user receiving an attacker’s session or vice
versa.

This was patched in 7.1.0 but not previously identified as a security
vulnerability.

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the
workarounds immediately.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Upgrade to Rails 7.1.X, or configure caching proxies not to cache the
Set-Cookie headers.

Release Notes

6.1.7.7 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

6.1.7.6 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

6.1.7.5 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

✳️ activesupport (6.1.7.4 → 6.1.7.7) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Possible File Disclosure of Locally Encrypted Files

There is a possible file disclosure of locally encrypted files in Active Support. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2023-38037.

Versions Affected: >= 5.2.0 Not affected: < 5.2.0 Fixed Versions: 7.0.7.1, 6.1.7.5

Impact

ActiveSupport::EncryptedFile writes contents that will be encrypted to a temporary file. The temporary file’s permissions are defaulted to the user’s current umask settings, meaning that it’s possible for other users on the same system to read the contents of the temporary file.

Attackers that have access to the file system could possibly read the contents of this temporary file while a user is editing it.

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

To work around this issue, you can set your umask to be more restrictive like this:

$ umask 0077
Release Notes

6.1.7.7 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

6.1.7.6 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

6.1.7.5 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

✳️ minitest (5.19.0 → 5.22.2) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

5.22.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

5.22.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

5.22.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

5.21.2 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

5.21.1 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

5.21.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

5.20.0 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

✳️ rails (6.1.7.4 → 6.1.7.7) · Repo

Release Notes

6.1.7.7

More info than we can show here.

6.1.7.6

More info than we can show here.

6.1.7.5

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

✳️ rake (13.0.6 → 13.1.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

13.1.0

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ actioncable (indirect, 6.1.7.4 → 6.1.7.7) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.1.7.7 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

6.1.7.6 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

6.1.7.5 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ actionmailbox (indirect, 6.1.7.4 → 6.1.7.7) · Repo · Changelog

↗️ actionmailer (indirect, 6.1.7.4 → 6.1.7.7) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.1.7.7 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

6.1.7.6 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

6.1.7.5 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ actiontext (indirect, 6.1.7.4 → 6.1.7.7) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.1.7.7 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

6.1.7.6 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

6.1.7.5 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ actionview (indirect, 6.1.7.4 → 6.1.7.7) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.1.7.7 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

6.1.7.6 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

6.1.7.5 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ activejob (indirect, 6.1.7.4 → 6.1.7.7) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.1.7.7 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

6.1.7.6 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

6.1.7.5 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ activemodel (indirect, 6.1.7.4 → 6.1.7.7) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.1.7.7 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

6.1.7.6 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

6.1.7.5 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ activerecord (indirect, 6.1.7.4 → 6.1.7.7) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.1.7.7 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

6.1.7.6 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

6.1.7.5 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ concurrent-ruby (indirect, 1.2.2 → 1.2.3) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

1.2.3

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ date (indirect, 3.3.3 → 3.3.4) · Repo

Release Notes

3.3.4

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ globalid (indirect, 1.1.0 → 1.2.1) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

1.2.0

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ loofah (indirect, 2.21.3 → 2.22.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

2.22.0

More info than we can show here.

2.21.4

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ net-imap (indirect, 0.3.7 → 0.4.10) · Repo

Release Notes

0.4.10

More info than we can show here.

0.4.9.1

More info than we can show here.

0.4.9

More info than we can show here.

0.4.8

More info than we can show here.

0.4.7

More info than we can show here.

0.4.6

More info than we can show here.

0.4.5

More info than we can show here.

0.4.4

More info than we can show here.

0.4.3

More info than we can show here.

0.4.2

More info than we can show here.

0.4.1

More info than we can show here.

0.4.0

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ net-protocol (indirect, 0.2.1 → 0.2.2) · Repo

Release Notes

0.2.2

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ net-smtp (indirect, 0.3.3 → 0.4.0.1) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

0.4.0.1

More info than we can show here.

0.4.0

More info than we can show here.

0.3.4

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ nio4r (indirect, 2.5.9 → 2.7.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

2.7.0

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ nokogiri (indirect, 1.15.4 → 1.16.2) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Improper Handling of Unexpected Data Type in Nokogiri

Summary

Nokogiri v1.16.2 upgrades the version of its dependency libxml2 to v2.12.5.

libxml2 v2.12.5 addresses the following vulnerability:

CVE-2024-25062 / https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-25062
described at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/issues/604
patched by https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/commit/92721970

Please note that this advisory only applies to the CRuby implementation of
Nokogiri < 1.16.2, and only if the packaged libraries are being used. If
you've overridden defaults at installation time to use system libraries
instead of packaged libraries, you should instead pay attention to your
distro's libxml2 release announcements.

Severity

The Nokogiri maintainers have evaluated this as Moderate.

Mitigation

Upgrade to Nokogiri >= 1.16.2.

Users who are unable to upgrade Nokogiri may also choose a more complicated
mitigation: compile and link Nokogiri against external libraries libxml2 >=
2.12.5 which will also address these same issues.

JRuby users are not affected.

Workarounds

Release Notes

1.16.2

More info than we can show here.

1.16.1

More info than we can show here.

1.16.0

More info than we can show here.

1.15.5

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ racc (indirect, 1.7.1 → 1.7.3) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

1.7.3

More info than we can show here.

1.7.2

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ rack (indirect, 2.2.8 → 2.2.8.1) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Possible Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Header Parsing

There is a possible denial of service vulnerability in the header parsing
routines in Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier
CVE-2024-26146.

Versions Affected: All. Not affected: None Fixed Versions: 2.0.9.4, 2.1.4.4, 2.2.8.1, 3.0.9.1

Impact

Carefully crafted headers can cause header parsing in Rack to take longer than
expected resulting in a possible denial of service issue. Accept and
Forwarded headers are impacted.

Ruby 3.2 has mitigations for this problem, so Rack applications using
Ruby 3.2 or newer are unaffected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.

🚨 Possible DoS Vulnerability with Range Header in Rack

There is a possible DoS vulnerability relating to the Range request header in
Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-26141.

Versions Affected: >= 1.3.0. Not affected: < 1.3.0 Fixed Versions: 3.0.9.1, 2.2.8.1

Impact

Carefully crafted Range headers can cause a server to respond with an
unexpectedly large response. Responding with such large responses could lead
to a denial of service issue.

Vulnerable applications will use the Rack::File middleware or the
Rack::Utils.byte_ranges methods (this includes Rails applications).

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.

🚨 Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Content-Type Parsing

There is a possible denial of service vulnerability in the content type
parsing component of Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE
identifier CVE-2024-25126.

Versions Affected: >= 0.4 Not affected: < 0.4 Fixed Versions: 3.0.9.1, 2.2.8.1

Impact

Carefully crafted content type headers can cause Rack’s media type parser to
take much longer than expected, leading to a possible denial of service
vulnerability.

Impacted code will use Rack’s media type parser to parse content type headers.
This code will look like below:

request.media_type

OR

request.media_type_params

OR

Rack::MediaType.type(content_type)

Some frameworks (including Rails) call this code internally, so upgrading is
recommended!

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the
workarounds immediately.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.

Release Notes

2.2.8.1

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ railties (indirect, 6.1.7.4 → 6.1.7.7) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.1.7.7 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

6.1.7.6 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

6.1.7.5 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ sprockets (indirect, 4.2.0 → 4.2.1) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

4.2.1

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ thor (indirect, 1.2.2 → 1.3.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

1.3.0

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ timeout (indirect, 0.4.0 → 0.4.1) · Repo

Release Notes

0.4.1

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ zeitwerk (indirect, 2.6.11 → 2.6.13) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

2.6.13 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

2.6.12 (from changelog)

More info than we can show here.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.


Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu cancel merge
Cancels automatic merging of this PR
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu bot added the depfu label Feb 25, 2024
Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Feb 25, 2024

Code Climate has analyzed commit aa55d7d and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

Copy link
Contributor Author

depfu bot commented Aug 13, 2024

Closing because this update has already been applied

@depfu depfu bot closed this Aug 13, 2024
@depfu depfu bot deleted the depfu/update/activestorage-6.1.7.7 branch August 13, 2024 14:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants