Add PermissionedDomain support for MPTs.

[Tapanito]

No description provided.

[Tapanito]

cc: @sappenin @shawnxie999

[sappenin]

LGTM, nice work @Tapanito !

[shawnxie999]

DomainID would considered to be a change for another amendment, and not for XLS-33. I'm not opposing making this change (it makes things easier to find when everything is in one place). But I’m curious if there’s a formal process for updating a previous spec based on a later spec. @sappenin

[mDuo13]

I think it's important to be careful/explicit about dependencies among multiple amendments like this. What happens if MPT support is enabled on a given network and Permissioned Domains aren't?

[mDuo13]

Actually, let me take this a step further and say:

THIS SHOULD NOT BE MERGED AS-IS.

The MPTokensV1 amendment is already open for voting in a released stable version of the rippled server. We cannot implement transaction processing changes such as this without having a separate amendment for it. Otherwise, servers with the v2.3.0 version of the MPTokensV1 amendment would diverge from servers with the hypothetical future version of the amendment.

So any change to this spec should make it clear which amendment gates the addition/change to the spec.