"In the world of system programming, elegance is not about what you add, but what you consciously leave out."
I'm a system programmer who believes that the best systems are like well-crafted mechanical watches: precise, reliable, and free from unnecessary complications. Just as a master horologist carefully selects each component, I choose my tools with purpose:
typedef struct SystemPhilosophy {
const char *init_system;
const char *privilege_escalation;
const char *package_manager;
bool has_systemd;
} SystemPhilosophy;
static const SystemPhilosophy my_setup = {
.init_system = "runit", // Because simplicity is the ultimate sophistication
.privilege_escalation = "doas", // sudo? We don't do that here
.package_manager = "xbps", // apt? Never heard of her
.has_systemd = false // And that's the way we like it
};
tech_stack = {
'systems': ['Void Linux', 'runit', 'opendoas'],
'languages': {
'primary': ['C23', 'C2x'],
'scripting': ['Bash', 'Python', 'Shell'],
},
'specialties': [
'System Programming',
'Security Optimization',
'Portable Software Design',
'Performance Tuning'
]
}
Just as a well-designed circuit minimizes noise, my code follows strict principles:
- 4 spaces indentation (tabs are like systemd: unnecessary complexity)
- Security-first approach (because the best exploits are the ones that can't happen)
- Bleeding-edge C23/C2x features (staying current like runit stays reliable)
- Clean, documented, and maintainable code (because future-you will thank present-you)
- Minimalist but powerful (like runit: does one thing, does it perfectly)
- Security-focused (opendoas: because root access should be explicit)
- No bloat policy (if it's not needed, it's not included)
- Performance-oriented (every CPU cycle counts)
[[nodiscard]] static inline const char* get_current_focus(void) {
return "Building efficient, secure, and portable systems "
"that make complexity an implementation detail, "
"not a user experience.";
}
- System Programming: Crafting efficient, secure, and portable programs in C/C2x
- Init Systems: Specializing in runit-based solutions (because init should be simple)
- Security Optimization: Implementing robust security measures without compromising performance
- Shell Scripting: Automation with Bash/Shell (because repetitive tasks are for computers)
- Python: For when C is like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
#!/bin/sh
# The UNIX Philosophy, updated for modern times
do_one_thing() {
echo "Do one thing and do it well"
}
keep_it_simple() {
echo "Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication"
}
main() {
do_one_thing
keep_it_simple
}
main "$@"
"If you think good architecture is expensive, try bad architecture."